Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature, control coefficient

The diffusion current Id depends upon several factors, such as temperature, the viscosity of the medium, the composition of the base electrolyte, the molecular or ionic state of the electro-active species, the dimensions of the capillary, and the pressure on the dropping mercury. The temperature coefficient is about 1.5-2 per cent °C 1 precise measurements of the diffusion current require temperature control to about 0.2 °C, which is generally achieved by immersing the cell in a water thermostat (preferably at 25 °C). A metal ion complex usually yields a different diffusion current from the simple (hydrated) metal ion. The drop time t depends largely upon the pressure on the dropping mercury and to a smaller extent upon the interfacial tension at the mercury-solution interface the latter is dependent upon the potential of the electrode. Fortunately t appears only as the sixth root in the Ilkovib equation, so that variation in this quantity will have a relatively small effect upon the diffusion current. The product m2/3 t1/6 is important because it permits results with different capillaries under otherwise identical conditions to be compared the ratio of the diffusion currents is simply the ratio of the m2/3 r1/6 values. [Pg.597]

Benson [499] and Livingstone [500] considered the influence of experimental accuracy on measured rate and temperature coefficients. To measure the rate coefficient to 0.1%, the relative errors in each ctj value must be <0.1% and the reaction interval should be at least 50%. Temperature control to achieve this level of precision must be 0.003% or 0.01 K at 300 K. For temperature control to 1 K, the minimum error in the rate coefficient is 5% and in the activation energy, measured over a 20 K interval, is 10%. No allowance is included in these calculations for additional factors such as self-heating or cooling. [Pg.83]

This research used mechanically agitated tank reactor system shown in Fig. 1. The reactor, 102 mm in diameter and 165 mm in height, was made of transparant pyrex glass and was equipped with four baffles, 120 mm in length and 8 mm in width, and six blades disc turbine impeller 45 mm in diameter and 12 mm in width. The impeller was rotated by electric motor with digital impeller rotation speed indicator. Waterbath thermostatic, equipped with temperature controller was used to stabilize reactor temperature. Gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient kia was determined using dynamic oxygenation method as has been used by Suprapto et al. [11]. [Pg.222]

The terms in Eq. (6) include the gravitational constant, g, the tube radius, R, the fluid viscosity, p, the solute concentration in the donor phase, C0, and the penetration depth, The density difference between the solution and solvent (ps - p0) is critical to the calculation of a. Thus, this method is dependent upon accurate measurement of density values and close temperature control, particularly when C0 represents a dilute solution. This method has been shown to be sensitive to different diffusion coefficients for various ionic species of citrate and phosphate [5], The variability of this method in terms of the coefficient of variation ranged from 19% for glycine to 2.9% for ortho-aminobenzoic acid. [Pg.107]

Offringa, J.C.A., de Kruif, C.G., Van Ekeren, P.J., Jacobs, M.H.G. (1983) Measurement of the evaporation coefficient and saturation vapor pressure of fraras -diphenylethene using a temperature-controlled vacuum quartz-crystal microbalance. J. Chem. Ther-modyn. 15, 681-690. [Pg.912]

For the calibration of most infrared ear thermometers the sensitivities S0 and R0 and the temperature coefficients Sj and a for both sensors have to be determined. Typically a two-step calibration is performed. In the first step the ambient sensor is calibrated by immersing it into two different temperature controlled baths. In the second step the thermopile sensor is calibrated by measuring the output signal while placing it before two different blackbody radiation sources. [Pg.78]

If a proportional feedback temperature controller is used, calculate the con> troller gain that yields a closedloop damping coefficient of 0.707 and calculate the closedloop time constant of the system when (u) Jacket water only is used. [Pg.372]

The temperature tuning coefficient of TeOa is 0.025 nm/°C, so it is clear that in order to combat the effects of thermal heating of the crystal due to incident optical and aconstic power, as well as environmental considerations, a good level of thermal control is needed. This can be in the form of a thermo-electrically cooled enclosure. This will deal to a certain extent with the need to achieve analyzer wavelength repeatability. However, it does not address the issue of wavelength reproducibility between AOTF modnles, which impacts the transportability of calibrations and datasets between analyzers. [Pg.126]

Much of the recent impetus for temperature control has focused on exploiting the effects of elevated temperature on viscosity and diffusion coefficients [2], These lead to faster separations and also allow smaller particle diameters to be employed with conventional HPLC hardware. As the viscosity of solvents decreases, the column pressure drops. This can be exploited by using faster flow rates and smaller particle diameters. All of this leads to faster separations. In one experiment in this laboratory, a separation which required 8 min at room temperature was reduced to 2 min at 50°C without changing the column. Speed enhancements of as much as 50-I00-fold have been reported [13] as shown in Figure 9.1. [Pg.258]

It has already been stated that the retention of a solute depends on the magnitude of the distribution coefficient of the solute between the mobile and stationary phases. Furthermore, according to Vant Hoff s Law, the distribution coefficient will vary according to the exponent of the reciprocal of the absolute temperature. In addition, the dispersion of a solute band in a column will be shown to depend on the dlffusivity of the solute In both phases, the viscosity of the mobile phase and also on the distribution coefficient of the solute, all of which vary with temperature. It follows that, for consistent results, the column must be carefully thermostated. The column and its contents have a significant heat capacity and, consequently, it is of little use trytng to thermostat the column in an air bath for satisfactory temperature control, the thermostating medium... [Pg.9]

The expansion coefficient of vitreous silica can be controlled by doping the glass with titania. At 7.4 wt °/o Ti02, the room temperature expansion coefficient is effectively zero (<10-8 /° C) (146). [Pg.505]

Telegina et al. 72> showed that the activation energy for the viscous flow of a polyester oligomer filled with glass microspheres is 46.9 kJ/mol, while that of an epoxy oligomer is 78.3 kJ/mol. They also established the important fact that the addition of microspheres to an oligomer composition does not change the temperature viscosity coefficient. This means that the viscosity of a mixture with microspheres can be controlled, if the temperature dependence of the viscosity of the binder is known. [Pg.77]

The ferric ion concentrations are determined by measuring the absorbance of the solutions, using a temperature-controlled (25°C.) spectro-phometer with the absorption peak around 304 m/z. It is necessary to measure the extinction coefficient at the absorption peak for each instrument used. The molar extinction coefficients for our instruments are 2200 for the Cary model 15 at 302.5 m/z and 2352 for the Beckman model DB at 304 m/z. [Pg.85]

Effect of Temperature during Reading. The molar extinction coefficient of Fe3+ was determined temperature-dependent in the temperature range 20°-55°C. to the extent of 0.59% per degree centigrade. It is, therefore, necessary to read the solutions in a temperature-controlled spectrophotometer or to correct for the temperature variation for 25°C. [Pg.90]

An often-used method for the limitation of the heat release rate is an interlock of the feed with the temperature of the reaction mass. This method consists of halting the feed when the temperature reaches a predefined limit. This feed control strategy keeps the reactor temperature under control even in the case of poor dynamic behavior of the reactor temperature control system, should the heat exchange coefficient be lowered (e.g. fouling crusts) or feed rate too high. [Pg.169]


See other pages where Temperature, control coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.384]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.393]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.369 ]




SEARCH



Controllability coefficient

Partition coefficient temperature control

Temperature coefficient

Temperature control

Temperature control controllers

Temperature controller

Temperature-controlled

© 2024 chempedia.info