Survey of simplified models

There is no unique way to construct coarse-grained models of polymer systems. In fact, the choice of model very much depends on the physical problems that one may wish to address, and also many details are fixed from the desire to construct computationally efficient simulation algo-rithms. Thus many variants of models for polymer chains exist, and there may still be the need to invent new ones This section is also not intended to be exhaustive, but rather restricts attention only to the most common models which are widely used in various contexts, as will become apparent in later chapters of this book. 

---

The fluid mosaic model conveniently describes how the constituent molecules are ordered, and it correctly describes, in first order, some of the membrane s properties. However, it does not give explicit insight into why the biological membrane has a particular structure, and how this depends on the properties of the constituent molecules and the physicochemical conditions surrounding it. For this reason, only qualitative and no quantitative use can be made of this model as it pertains to permeation properties, for example. It is instructive to review the physicochemical principles that are responsible for typical membrane characteristics. In such a survey, it is necessary to discuss simplified cases of self-assembly first, before the complexity of the biological system may be understood. The focus of this quest for principles will therefore be more on the level of the molecular nature of the membrane, rather than viewing a... 

This article deals with one of the above mentioned subjects already treated in the 1940 s branched polymers. We present a survey of a number of scattering functions for special branched polymer structures. Hie basis of these model calculations is still the Flory-Stockmayer (FS) theory1,14,15) but now endowed with the more powerful technique of cascade theory which greatly simplifies the calculations. 

One possible explanation is that the surface models (both for the fitting of SXRD and for FP calculations) are too simple. The range of data for vacuum-annealed and (lx 3)-reconstructed TiOi (10 0) highlights the difficulties of fitting SXRD patterns to a limited set of over-simplified structural models [59]. However, an FP survey of over 60 stoichiometric surfaces of rutile (110) confirmed that the unreconstructed (1x1) bulk-termination is the most stable, with a computed surface energy of Ysuif=0-80 0.04 Jm [23]. 

Chapter 12 by Materazzi is a survey of the thermal analysis literature on coordination compounds and inorganics published in the years 2000-2006 and is limited to the most recent representative publications. Coordination compounds and inorganics are extensively studied for a variety of reasons, including their use as simplified models for understanding the behaviour of the more complex molecules that are involved in biological reactions or that are of biomedical interest. 

Larson et air give a comprehensive survey of analytic solutions of the one-line model available in the literature. Most of them address the simplified geometries and wave climatic conditions. Therefore, they are not always able to reproduce realistic problems. 

A general conclusion that can be drawn from this short survey on the many attempts to develop analytical theories to describe the phase behavior of polymer melts, polymer solutions, and polymer blends is that this is a formidable problem, which is far from a fully satisfactory solution. To gauge the accuracy of any such approaches in a particular case one needs a comparison with computer simulations that can be based on exactly the same coarse-grained model on which the analytical theory is based. In fact, none of the approaches described above can fully take into account all details of chemical bonding and local chemical structure of such multicomponent polymer systems and, hence, when the theory based on a simplified model is directly compared to experiment, agreement between theory and experiment may be fortuitous (cancellation of errors made by use of both an inadequate model and an inaccurate theory). Similarly, if disagreement between theory and experiment occurs, one does not know whether this should be attributed to the inadequacy of the model, the lack of accuracy of the theoretical treatment of the model, or both. Only the simulation can yield numerically exact results (apart from statistical errors, which can be controlled, at least in principle) on exactly the same model, which forms the basis of the analytical theory. It is precisely this reason that has made computer simulation methods so popular in recent decades [58-64]. 

Models of the above have been presented by various researchers of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the academia. The above equation has been solved principally (a) numerically over a temporal and spatial discretized domain, via finite difference or finite element mathematical techniques (e.g., 11) (b) analytically, by seeking exact solutions for simplified environmental conditions (e.g., 12) or (c) probabilistically (e.g., 13). 

As this chapter aims at explaining the basics, operational principles, advantages and pitfalls of vibrational spectroscopic sensors, some topics have been simplified or omitted altogether, especially when involving abstract theoretical or complex mathematical models. The same applies to methods having no direct impact on sensor applications. For a deeper introduction into theory, instrumentation and related experimental methods, comprehensive surveys can be found in any good textbook on vibrational spectroscopy or instrumental analytical chemistry1"4. 

---