Surface viscosity surfactants

The effective surface viscosity is best found by experiment with the system in question, followed by back calculation through Eq. (22-55). From the precursors to Eq. (22-55), such experiments have yielded values of [L, on the order of (dyn-s)/cm for common surfactants in water at room temperature, which agrees with independent measurements [Lemhch, Chem. Eng. ScL, 23, 932 (1968) and Shih and Lem-lich. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 13, 751 (1967)]. However, the expected high [L, for aqueous solutions of such sldn-forming substances as saponin and albumin was not attained, perhaps because of their non-newtonian surface behavior [Shih and Lemhch, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fun-dam., 10, 254 (1971) andjashnani and Lemlich, y. Colloid Inteiface ScL, 46, 13(1974)]. 

Performance Indices Quality Factors Optimum E1LB Critical micelle concentration (CMC) Soil solubilization capacity Krafft point (ionic surfactants only) Cloud point (nonionic surfactants only) Viscosity Calcium binding capacity Surface tension reduction at CMC Dissolution time Material and/or structural attributes... 

As is known, if one blows air bubbles in pure water, no foam is formed. On the other hand, if a detergent or protein (amphiphile) is present in the system, adsorbed surfactant molecules at the interface produce foam or soap bubble. Foam can be characterized as a coarse dispersion of a gas in a liquid, where the gas is the major phase volume. The foam, or the lamina of liquid, will tend to contract due to its surface tension, and a low surface tension would thus be expected to be a necessary requirement for good foam-forming property. Furthermore, in order to be able to stabilize the lamina, it should be able to maintain slight differences of tension in its different regions. Therefore, it is also clear that a pure liquid, which has constant surface tension, cannot meet this requirement. The stability of such foams or bubbles has been related to monomolecular film structures and stability. For instance, foam stability has been shown to be related to surface elasticity or surface viscosity, qs, besides other interfacial forces. 

The surface viscosity effect on terminal velocity results in a calculated drag curve that is closer to the one for rigid spheres (K5). The deep dip exhibited by the drag curve for drops in pure liquid fields is replaced by a smooth transition without a deep valley. The damping of internal circulation reduces the rate of mass transfer. Even a few parts per million of the surfactant are sometimes sufficient to cause a very radical change. 

Bendure indicates 10 ways to increase foam stability (1) increase bulk liquid viscosity, (2) increase surface viscosity, (3) maintain thick walls (higher liquid-to-gas ratio), (4) reduce liquid surface tension, (5) increase surface elasticity, (6) increase surface concentration, (7) reduce surfactant-adsorption rate, (8) prevent liquid evaporation, (9) avoid mechanical stresses, and (10) eliminate foam inhibitors. Obviously, the reverse of each of these actions, when possible, is a way to control and break foam. 

High surface viscosity and/or mechanically strong interfacial film - this acts as a barrier to coalescence and may be enhanced by adsorption of fine solids, or of dose-packed surfactant molecules. 

Naire, S., Braun, R.J. andSnow, S.A. (2001) An insoluble surfactant model for a vertical draining free film with variable surface viscosity. Phys. Fluids, 13(9), 2492-502. 

Microfiltration is a unit operation for the separation of small particles. The separation limits are between 0.02 and 10 (jum particle dimensions. Microfiltration can be carried out in a dead-end mode and a cross-flow mode. In downstream processing, the cross-flow filtration is carried out continuously or discontinuously. The most important parameters that determine the productivity of cross-flow microfiltration are transmembrane pressure, velocity, particle size and surface, viscosity of the liquid and additives such as surfactants, and changing the surface and surface tension. 

Numerous investigators have elaborated the theory by including bulk transport and surface diffusion of the surfactant molecules [45], or the effect of shear and dilatation surface viscosity [49], The general conclusion is that the rate of thinning predicted by Reynolds equation is too low (the reader may find the details in ref. [237]). Hopefully our case is different and we do not have to enter into these considerations (see Section 3.2). 

In conclusion we will note that the main difference between aqueous emulsion films and foam films involves the dependences of the various parameters of these films (potential of the diffuse double electric layer, surfactant adsorption, surface viscosity, etc.) on the polarity of the organic phase, the distribution of the emulsifier between water and organic phase and the relatively low, as compared to the water/air interface, interfacial tension. 

A quantitative dependence of the foam expansion ratio on the surfactant concentration, solution viscosity, surface viscosity and height of the foam column in a continuously generated foam has been reported in [83], Lowering the rate of gas supply led to an increase in... 

The surfactant and electrolyte nature as well as the nature of various stabilising additives affects the expansion ratio through surface tension, film type, and solution and surface viscosities, determining the degree of the tangential mobility of the border surfaces. 

Schick and Fowkes (11) studied the effect of alkyl chain length of surfactants on critical micelle concentration (CMC). The maximum lowering of CMC occurred when both the anionic and nonionic surfactants had the same chain length. It was also reported that the coefficient of friction between polymeric surfaces reaches a minimum as the chain length of paraffinic oils approached that of stearic acid (12). In order to delineate the effect of chain length of fatty acids on lubrication, the scuff load was measured by Cameron and Crouch (13). The maximum scuff load was observed when both hydrocarbon oil and fatty acid had the same chain length. Similar results of the effect of chain length compatibility on dielectric absorption, surface viscosity and rust prevention have been reported in the literature (14-16). 

Table I shows various surface and microscopic properties such as surface tension, surface viscosity, foaminess (i.e. foam volume generated in a given time) and bubble size in foams of the surfactant solutions as a function of chain length compatibility. The results indicate that a minimum in surface tension, a maximum in surface viscosity, a maximum in foaminess and a minimum in bubble size were observed when both the components of the mixed surfactant system have the same chain length. These results clearly show that the molecular packing at air-water interface influences surface properties of the surfactant solutions, which can influence microscopic characteristics of foams. The effect of chain length compatibility on microscopic and surface properties of surfactant solutions can be explained as reported in the previous section.

Use of mixed surfactant films In many cases the used of mixed surfactants (e.g., anionic and nonionic or long chain alcohols) can reduce coalescence as a result of several effects a high Gibbs elasticity high surface viscosity and hindered diffusion of surfactant molecules from the film. 

---