Surface Tension Domain

For droplets of high surface tension, the droplet flattening process may be governed by the transformation of impact kinetic energy to surface energy. In case that this mechanism dominates, the flattening ratio becomes only dependent on the Weber number, as derived by Madej ski by fitting the numerical results of the full analytical model  

The values of the Weber number pertinent to this correlation were suggested to be sufficiently small so that viscous and solidification effects can be neglected. Another analytical expression, derived from Madej ski s full model after simplification under the conditions 

The correlations derived by Chandra and Avedisian, 41 and Collings et aid514 are similar to Madejski s equation 401 except that the 

---

Surface Tension Domain The kinetic energy of an impacting droplet is converted to surface energy during spreading. 

If the dominating domain is selected correctly, the error induced by the simplification will be no more than about 20%. However, even well into the viscous dissipation domain, the effects of the surface tension are still significant, while in the surface tension domain, the effects of viscous dissipation disappear far more rapidly as one moves away from the borderline. In other words, the viscous energy dissipation contribution to the spread factor rapidly declines within the surface tension-dominated domain, while significant residual surface tension effects extend well into the viscous energy dissipation domain. 

In figure A3.3.9 the early-time results of the interface fonnation are shown for = 0.48. The classical spinodal corresponds to 0.58. Interface motion can be simply monitored by defining the domain boundary as the location where i = 0. Surface tension smooths the domain boundaries as time increases. Large interconnected clusters begin to break apart into small circular droplets around t = 160. This is because the quadratic nonlinearity eventually outpaces the cubic one when off-criticality is large, as is the case here. 

The temperature distribution has a characteristic maximum within the liquid domain, which is located in the vicinity of the evaporation front. Such a maximum results from two opposite factors (1) heat transfer from the hot wall to the liquid, and (2) heat removal due to the liquid evaporation at the evaporation front. The pressure drops monotonically in both domains and there is a pressure jump at the evaporation front due to the surface tension and phase change effect on the liquid-vapor interface. 

Figure 16 shows the experimental arrangement for the measurement of the surface pressure. The trough (200 mm long, 50 mm wide and 10 mm deep) was coated with Teflon. The subphase temperature was controlled within 0.1 C by means of a jacket connected to a thermostated water circulator, and the environmental air temperature was kept at 18 °C. The surface tension was measured with a Wilhelmy plate of platinum(24.5 x 10.0 x 0.15 mm). The surface pressure monitored by an electronic balance was successively stored in a micro- computer, and then Fourier transformed to a frequency domain. The surface area was changed successively in a sinusoidal manner, between 37.5 A2/molecule and 62.5 A2/molecule. We have chosen an unsaturated phospholipid(l,2-dioleoyl-3-sn-phosphatidyI-choline DOPC) as a curious sample to measure the dynamic surface tension with this novel instrument, as the unsaturated lipids play an important role in biomembranes and, moreover, such a "fluid" lipid was expected to exhibit marked dynamic, nonlinear characteristics. The spreading solution was 0.133 mM chloroform solution of DOPC. The chloroform was purified with three consecutive distillations. 

Pratt and co-workers have proposed a quasichemical theory [118-122] in which the solvent is partitioned into inner-shell and outer-shell domains with the outer shell treated by a continuum electrostatic method. The cluster-continuum model, mixed discrete-continuum models, and the quasichemical theory are essentially three different names for the same approach to the problem [123], The quasichemical theory, the cluster-continuum model, other mixed discrete-continuum approaches, and the use of geometry-dependent atomic surface tensions provide different ways to account for the fact that the solvent does not retain its bulk properties right up to the solute-solvent boundary. Experience has shown that deviations from bulk behavior are mainly localized in the first solvation shell. Although these first-solvation-shell effects are sometimes classified into cavitation energy, dispersion, hydrophobic effects, hydrogen bonding, repulsion, and so forth, they clearly must also include the fact that the local dielectric constant (to the extent that such a quantity may even be defined) of the solvent is different near the solute than in the bulk (or near a different kind of solute or near a different part of the same solute). Furthermore... 

In summary, information about the interactions between layers allowed one to identify the domains where the lamellar phase is unstable. A positive derivative off with respect to di or d2 implies that the region is inaccessible to a lamellar phase. In this case, a water or oil phase will separate until the allowed values for dj and 82 will be reached. In addition, a negative surface tension indicates that another phase (cubic,hexagonal, microemulsion, etc.) is stable. It should be, however, emphasized that when y > 0, a phase other than the lamellar one may be the thermodynamically stable one. 

---