Surface precipitates

Sorption and Desorption Processes. Sorption is a generalized term that refers to surface-induced removal of the pesticide from solution it is the attraction and accumulation of pesticide at the sod—water or sod—air interface, resulting in molecular layers on the surface of sod particles. Experimentally, sorption is characterized by the loss of pesticide from the sod solution, making it almost impossible to distinguish between sorption in which molecular layers form on sod particle surfaces, precipitation in which either a separate soHd phase forms on soHd surfaces, covalent bonding with the sod particle surface, or absorption into sod particles or organisms. Sorption is generally considered a reversible equdibrium process. 

Precipitating (cathodic) inhibitors are simply chemicals that form insoluble precipitates that can coat and protect the surface precipitated films are not as tenacious as passive films and take longer to repair after a system upset. 

The sacrificial core approach entails depositing a coating on the surface of particles by either the controlled surface precipitation of inorganic molecular precursors from solution or by direct surface reactions [2,3,5,6,8,9,33-35,38], followed by removal of the core by thermal or chemical means. Using this approach, micron-size hollow capsules of yttrium compounds [2], silica spheres [38], and monodisperse hollow silica nanoparticles [3,35] have been generated. 

Ivanovich M, Harmon RS (eds) Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 34-61 Giammar DE, Hering JG (2001) Time scales for sorption-desorption and surface precipitation of uranyl on goethite. Environ Sci Technol 35 3332-3337... 

Sposito, G. Distinguish adsorption from surface precipitation. In Geochemical Processes at Mineral Surfaces. J.A. Davis, K.F. Hayes, eds. Washington D.C. Americal Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 323,1986. 

Adsorption influences the reactivity of surfaces. It has been shown that the rates of processes such as precipitation (heterogeneous nucleation and surface precipitation), dissolution of minerals (of importance in the weathering of rocks, in the formation of soils and sediments, and in the corrosion of structures and metals), and in the catalysis and photocatalysis of redox processes, are critically dependent on the properties of the surfaces (surface species and their strucutral identity). 

In surface precipitation cations (or anions) which adsorb to the surface of a mineral may form at high surface coverage a precipitate of the cation (anion) with the constituent ions of the mineral. Fig. 6.9 shows schematically the surface precipitation of a cation M2+ to hydrous ferric oxide. This model, suggested by Farley et al. (1985), allows for a continuum between surface complex formation and bulk solution precipitation of the sorbing ion, i.e., as the cation is complexed at the surface, a new hydroxide surface is formed. In the model cations at the solid (oxide) water interface are treated as surface species, while those not in contact with the solution phase are treated as solid species forming a solid solution (see Appendix 6.2). The formation of a solid solution implies isomorphic substitution. At low sorbate cation concentrations, surface complexation is the dominant mechanism. As the sorbate concentration increases, the surface complex concentration and the mole fraction of the surface precipitate both increase until the surface sites become saturated. Surface precipitation then becomes the dominant "sorption" (= metal ion incorporation) mechanism. As bulk solution precipitation is approached, the mol fraction of the surface precipitate becomes large. 

Schematic representation of surface precipitation on hydrous ferric oxide (Fe(OH)3(s))...

Fig. 6.10 shows idealized isotherms (at constant pH) for cation binding to an oxide surface. In the case of cation binding, onto a solid hydrous oxide, a metal hydroxide may precipitate and may form at the surface prior to their formation in bulk solution and thus contribute to the total apparent "sorption". The contribution of surface precipitation to the overall sorption increases as the sorbate/sorbent ratio is increased. At very high ratios, surface precipitation may become the dominant "apparent" sorption mechanism. Isotherms showing reversals as shown by e have been observed in studies of phosphate sorption by calcite (Freeman and Rowell, 1981). 

Does Surface Precipitation occur at Concentrations lower than those calculated from the Solubility Product As the theory of solid solutions (see Appendix 6.2) explains, the solubility of a constituent is greatly reduced when it becomes a minor constituent of a solid solution phase (curve b in Fig. 6.10).Thus, a solid species, e.g., M(OH)2 can precipitate at lower pH values in the presence of a hydrous oxide (as a solid solvent), than in its absence. 

Adsorption and Precipitation vs heterogeneous Nucleation and Surface Precipitation. There is not only a continuum between surface complexation (adsorption) and precipitation, but there is also obiously a continuum from heterogeneous nucleation to surface precipitation. The two models are two limiting cases for the initiation of precipitation. In the heterogeneous nucleation model, the interface is fixed and no mixing of ions occurs across the interface. As a consequence precipi-... 

The uptake of a cation into a carbonate is thought to proceed via adsorption, eventually leading to surface precipitation and formation of a solid solution. Kinetics of cation adsorption occurs usually in subsequent steps the specific adsorption, i.e., the transfer at a carbonate surface from the solution phase into the adsorbed state must be assumed for most cations to be very fast. Most likely its rate is related to the rate of water exchange (cf. Chapter 4.4). Two examples of the rates of uptake or carbonate surfaces are given in Fig. 8.7. 

The processes described and their kinetics is of importance in the accumulation of trace metals by calcite in sediments and lakes (Delaney and Boyle, 1987) but also of relevance in the transport and retention of trace metals in calcareous aquifers. Fuller and Davis (1987) investigated the sorption by calcareous aquifer sand they found that after 24 hours the rate of Cd2+ sorption was constant and controlled by the rate of surface precipitation. Clean grains of primary minerals, e.g., quartz and alumino silicates, sorbed less Cd2+ than grains which had surface patches of secondary minerals, e.g., carbonates, iron and manganese oxides. Fig. 6.11 gives data (time sequence) on electron spin resonance spectra of Mn2+ on FeC03(s). 

The phenomena of surface precipitation and isomorphic substitutions described above and in Chapters 3.5, 6.5 and 6.6 are hampered because equilibrium is seldom established. The initial surface reaction, e.g., the surface complex formation on the surface of an oxide or carbonate fulfills many criteria of a reversible equilibrium. If we form on the outer layer of the solid phase a coprecipitate (isomorphic substitutions) we may still ideally have a metastable equilibrium. The extent of incipient adsorption, e.g., of HPOjj on FeOOH(s) or of Cd2+ on caicite is certainly dependent on the surface charge of the sorbing solid, and thus on pH of the solution etc. even the kinetics of the reaction will be influenced by the surface charge but the final solid solution, if it were in equilibrium, would not depend on the surface charge and the solution variables which influence the adsorption process i.e., the extent of isomorphic substitution for the ideal solid solution is given by the equilibrium that describes the formation of the solid solution (and not by the rates by which these compositions are formed). Many surface phenomena that are encountered in laboratory studies and in field observations are characterized by partial, or metastable equilibrium or by non-equilibrium relations. Reversibility of the apparent equilibrium or congruence in dissolution or precipitation can often not be assumed. 

Relaxation studies have shown that the attachment of an ion to a surface is very fast, but the establishment of equilibrium in wel1-dispersed suspensions of colloidal particles is much slower. Adsorption of cations by hydrous oxides may approach equilibrium within a matter of minutes in some systems (39-40). However, cation and anion sorption processes often exhibit a rapid initial stage of adsorption that is followed by a much slower rate of uptake (24,41-43). Several studies of short-term isotopic exchange of phosphate ions between aqueous solutions and oxide surfaces have demonstrated that the kinetics of phosphate desorption are very slow (43-45). Numerous hypotheses have been suggested for this slow attainment of equilibrium including 1) the formation of binuclear complexes on the surface (44) 2) dynamic particle-particle interactions in which an adsorbing ion enhances contact adhesion between particles (43,45-46) 3) diffusion of ions into adsorbents (47) and 4) surface precipitation (48-50). 

Spectroscopic techniques may provide the least ambiguous methods for verification of actual sorption mechanisms. Zeltner et al. (Chapter 8) have applied FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) spectroscopy and microcalorimetric titrations in a study of the adsorption of salicylic acid by goethite these techniques provide new information on the structure of organic acid complexes formed at the goethite-water interface. Ambe et al. (Chapter 19) present the results of an emission Mossbauer spectroscopic study of sorbed Co(II) and Sb(V). Although Mossbauer spectroscopy can only be used for a few chemical elements, the technique provides detailed information about the molecular bonding of sorbed species and may be used to differentiate between adsorption and surface precipitation. 

Electrostatic vs. Chemical Interactions in Surface Phenomena. There are three phenomena to which these surface equilibrium models are applied regularly (i) adsorption reactions, (ii) electrokinetic phenomena (e.g., colloid stability, electrophoretic mobility), and (iii) chemical reactions at surfaces (precipitation, dissolution, heterogeneous catalysis). 

Measurements of the chemical composition of an aqueous solution phase are interpreted commonly to provide experimental evidence for either adsorption or surface precipitation mechanisms in sorption processes. The conceptual aspects of these measurements vis-a-vis their usefulness in distinguishing adsorption from precipitation phenomena are reviewed critically. It is concluded that the inherently macroscopic, indirect nature of the data produced by such measurements limit their applicability to determine sorption mechanisms in a fundamental way. Surface spectroscopy (optical or magnetic resonance), although not a fully developed experimental technique for aqueous colloidal systems, appears to offer the best hope for a truly molecular-level probe of the interfacial region that can discriminate among the structures that arise there from diverse chemical conditions. 

A central problem in the chemistry of natural water systems is the establishment of experimental methods with which to distinguish adsorption from surface precipitation (1-3). Corey ( 2) has written a comprehensive review of this problem which should be read as an introduction to the present essay, particularly for his set of six conclusions that set out general conditions likely to result in adsorption or precipitation. The discussion to follow is not a comprehensive review, but instead focuses on three popular approaches to the adsorption/surface precipitation dichotomy. The emphasis here is on the conceptual relationship of each approach to the defining statements made above To what extent is an approach capable of distinguishing adsorption from surface precipitation ... 

SPOSITO Distinguishing Adsorption from Surface Precipitation... 

---