Lateral Density Distribution

Lateral density fluctuations are mostly confined to the adsorbed water layer. The lateral density distributions are conveniently characterized by scatter plots of oxygen coordinates in the surface plane. Fig. 6 shows such scatter plots of water molecules in the first (left) and second layer (right) near the Hg(l 11) surface. Here, a dot is plotted at the oxygen atom position at intervals of 0.1 ps. In the first layer, the oxygen distribution clearly shows the structure of the substrate lattice. In the second layer, the distribution is almost isotropic. In the first layer, the oxygen motion is predominantly oscillatory rather than diffusive. The self-diffusion coefficient in the adsorbate layer is strongly reduced compared to the second or third layer [127]. The data in Fig. 6 are qualitatively similar to those obtained in the group of Berkowitz and coworkers [62,128-130]. These authors compared the structure near Pt(lOO) and Pt(lll) in detail and also noted that the motion of water in the first layer is oscillatory about equilibrium positions and thus characteristic of a solid phase, while the motion in the second layer has more... 

FIG. 6 Lateral density distribution of oxygen atoms in the first (left) and second layer (right) on Hg(lll). A symbol is plotted at time intervals of 0.1 ps. 

Fig. 29. Lateral density distribution of I, F, and Li ions far from the electrode surface (left) and close to the electrode. A symbol is plotted every 0.1 ps for a total time of 60 ps during the simulations. The scale on the, x and y axes is in A. The ions are dissolved in a film consisting of 150 water molecules in contact with the mercury surface.

Numerical solution of Eq. (51) was carried out for a nonlocal effective Hamiltonian as well as for the approximated local Hamiltonian obtained by applying a gradient expansion. It was demonstrated that the nonlocal effective Hamiltonian represents quite well the lateral variation of the film density distribution. The results obtained showed also that the film behavior on the inhomogeneous substrate depends crucially on the temperature regime. Note that the film exhibits different wetting temperatures on both parts of the surface. For chemical potential below the bulk coexistence value the film thickness on both parts of the surface tends to appropriate assymptotic values at x cx) and obeys the power law x. Such a behavior of the film thickness is a consequence of van der Waals tails. The above result is valid when both parts of the surface exhibit either continuous (critical) or first-order wetting. 

Another common method of representing the electron density distribution is as a contour map, just as we can use a topographic contour map to represent the relief of a part of the earth s surface. Figure 7a shows a contour map of the electron density of the SCI2 molecule in the Oh (xy) plane. The lines in which the interatomic surfaces, that are discussed later, cut this plane are also shown. Figure 7b shows a corresponding map for the H20 molecule. 

A local variation in porosity can be produced by an inhomogeneous illumination intensity. However, any image projected on the backside of the wafer generates a smoothed-out current density distribution on the frontside, because of random diffusion of the charge carriers in the bulk. This problem can be reduced if thin wafers or illumination from the frontside is used. However, sharp lateral changes in porosity cannot be achieved. 

Using time-resolved crystallographic experiments, molecular structure is eventually linked to kinetics in an elegant fashion. The experiments are of the pump-probe type. Preferentially, the reaction is initiated by an intense laser flash impinging on the crystal and the structure is probed a time delay. At, later by the x-ray pulse. Time-dependent data sets need to be measured at increasing time delays to probe the entire reaction. A time series of structure factor amplitudes, IF, , is obtained, where the measured amplitudes correspond to a vectorial sum of structure factors of all intermediate states, with time-dependent fractional occupancies of these states as coefficients in the summation. Difference electron densities are typically obtained from the time series of structure factor amplitudes using the difference Fourier approximation (Henderson and Moffatt 1971). Difference maps are correct representations of the electron density distribution. The linear relation to concentration of states is restored in these maps. To calculate difference maps, a data set is also collected in the dark as a reference. Structure factor amplitudes from the dark data set, IFqI, are subtracted from those of the time-dependent data sets, IF,I, to get difference structure factor amplitudes, AF,. Using phases from the known, precise reference model (i.e., the structure in the absence of the photoreaction, which may be determined from... 

For bilayer membrane problems it may be a mistake to treat permeation through the membrane as a single diffusion process. In the first place it is extremely unlikely that the distribution of permeant molecules across the membrane is described by the diffusion equation. Second, the permeation may be related to lateral density fluctuations in the membrane, giving a quite nonuniform lateral distribution of the permeant molecules near the membrane surface at any instant. 

Typical values of R and D are 0.5 nm and 10-9 m2 s-1. The time dependence of the density distribution is shown in Fig. 1 for these parameters. As reaction proceeds, the density (or concentration) of reactant B in the immediate vicinity of A decreases. The time scale over which this reduction is most noticeable is R2/D 1 ns. This is the mean time it takes for a reactant to diffuse a distance R. Initially, the concentration of B around A is constant. As reaction begins, B diffuses towards A and reaction becomes rapid at times R2/D. Most depletion of the density at this time has occurred at short distances ( i2— 2R). At later times, more depletion of the density occurs at larger distances. Ultimately, after a time 100 R2/D little further change to the density distribution occurs. B now diffuses towards A at a rate which sustains a constant density distribution a steady-state is established and it has a distribution... 

With typical values for R and D as above, the Smoluchowski rate coefficient (19) is shown in Fig. 3 for a range of times. The time dependence of the rate coefficient is due to the transient concentration of B in excess of the steady-state concentration. As the density distribution of eqn. (16) relaxes to the steady-state distribution (17), so the rate coefficient decreases, because at longer times, B has to diffuse further to A on average. The magnitude of the rate coefficient ( 1010 dm3 mol-1 s-1) is large. In some reactions, the mutual diffusion coefficient of reactants may be nearer 5 x 1CT9 m2 s 1, and the rate coefficient is 3 x 1010 dm3 mol-1 s-1. Under such circumstances, diffusion-limited reactions proceed very rapidly. It is likely that the rates of most chemical reactions are slower than the diffusion-limited rate. Only the most rapid molecular chemical reactions are faster than diffusion-limited rates. Some typical reactions are discussed in Sect. 2 and will be reconsidered in Sect. 5 and later in the volume. 

Let us first collect a few simple properties of the moment free energy (37) which will be useful later. Recall that Eq. (37) faithfully represents the free energy density of any phase with density distribution in the family... 

---