Surface nanofiller

In order to support and meet this demand, an all-around development has taken place on the material front too, be it an elastomer new-generation nanofiller, surface-modified or plasma-treated filler reinforcing materials like aramid, polyethylene naphthenate (PEN), and carbonfiber nitrosoamine-free vulcanization and vulcanizing agents antioxidants and antiozonents series of post-vulcanization stabUizers environment-friendly process oil, etc. 

Interfacial behavior of different silicones was extensively studied, as indicated in Section 3.12.4.6. To add a few more examples, solution behavior of water-soluble polysiloxanes carrying different pendant hydrophilic groups, thus differing in hydrophobicity, was reported.584 A study of the aggregation phenomena of POSS in the presence of amphiphilic PDMS at the air/water interface was conducted in an attempt to elucidate nanofiller-aggregation mechanisms.585 An interesting phenomenon of the spontaneous formation of stable microtopographical surface domains, composed primarily of PDMS surrounded by polyurethane matrix, was observed in the synthesis of a cross-linked PDMS-polyurethane films.586... 

Interfacial structure is known to be different from bulk structure, and in polymers filled with nanofillers possessing extremely high specific surface areas, most of the polymers is present near the interface, in spite of the small weight fraction of filler. This is one of the reasons why the nature of the reinforcement is different in nanocomposites and is manifested even at very low filler loadings (<10 wt%). Crucial parameters in determining the effect of fillers on the properties of composites are filler size, shape, aspect ratio, and filler-matrix interactions [2-5]. In the case of nanocomposites, the properties of the material are more tied to the interface. Thus, the control and manipulation of microstructural evolution is essential for the growth of a strong polymer-filler interface in such nanocomposites. 

The lowering of die swell values has a direct consequence on the improvement of processability. It is apparent that the processability improves with the incorporation of the unmodified and the modified nanofillers. Figure lOa-c show the SEM micrographs of the surface of the extrudates at a particular shear rate of 61.2 s 1 for the unfilled and the nanoclay-filled 23SBR systems. The surface smoothness increases on addition of the unmodified filler, and further improves with the incorporation of the modified filler. This has been again attributed to the improved rubber-clay interaction in the exfoliated nanocomposites. 

Also, the loss in available surface area due to overlapping and aggregation is quite substantial in the case of nanofiller. As illustrated in Fig. 41, the loss is directly dependent on the interparticle distance between the fillers and, hence, also on the filler loading. Introduction of these two terms into the IAF in the form of the correlation length between the nanoparticles (J ) and the filler volume fraction ( ), respectively, mitigates the problem. 

Sun et al. (2006) examined the use of novel silica nanofillers in underfill for flip-chip applications, and showed that pre-cure rheology and post-cure values of Tg are effected by nanosilica surface treatment. 

At present a disperse material wide list is known, which is able to strengthen elastomeric polymer materials [5]. These materials are very diverse on their surface chemical constitution, but the small size of particles is a common feature for them. Based on the observation the hypothesis was offered that any solid material would strengthen the rubber at the condition, which it was in a very-dispersed state and could be dispersed in polymer matrix. Edwards [5] points out that filler particles small size is necessary and, probably, the main requirement for reinforcement effect realization in rubbers. Using modem terminology, the nanofiller particles, for which their aggregation process is suppressed as far as possible, would be the most effective ones for mbbers reinforcement [3, 12]. Therefore,... 

Let us fulfill the value theoretical estimation according to the two methods and compare these results with the ones obtained experimentally. The first method simulates interfacial layer in polymer composites as a result of interaction of two fractals— polymer matrix and nanofiller surface [19,20]. In this case, there is a sole linear scale /, which defines these fractals interpenetration distance [21]. As nanofiller elasticity modulus is essentially higher than the corresponding parameter for rubber (in the considered case—in 11 times, see Figure 6.1), then the indicated interaction... 

The fractal dimension of nanofiller surface d was determined with the help of the equation [3] ... 

As it has been noted earlier [45], the linearity of the plots, corresponding to Eqs. (6.23) and (6.25), and nonintegral value do not guarantee object self-similarity (and, hence, fractality). The nanofiller particle (aggregates of particles) structure low dimensions are due to the initial nanofiller particles surface high fractal dimension. 

From Eq. (6.37) it follows that nanofiller particle (aggregates of particles) surface dimension d s the parameter, controlling nanocomposites reinforcement degree [53]. This postulate corresponds to the known principle about the decisive role of numerous division surfaces in nanomateri-als as the basis of their properties change [54]. From Eqs. (6.4) to (6.6) it follows unequivocally that the value is defined by nanofiller particles... 

The interactions between the whiskers and the matrix are very significant The high form ratio of the nanoparticles (50-200) and the high specific surface area ( 170 m. g ) enable us to obtain major phenomena at the interphase. Indeed, in relation to traditional biocomposites based on cellulose fibers or microfibrils, the overall behavior of whisker-based materials is primarily linked to the interface/interphase between the matrix and the nanofiller, which controls the properties and overall performances of the material (mechanical properties, permeability, etc.). 

---