Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface layer, chemical potential thickness

Chemical Grafting. Polymer chains which are soluble in the suspending Hquid may be grafted to the particle surface to provide steric stabilization. The most common technique is the reaction of an organic silyl chloride or an organic titanate with surface hydroxyl groups in a nonaqueous solvent. For typical interparticle potentials and a particle diameter of 10 p.m, steric stabilization can be provided by a soluble polymer layer having a thickness of - 10 nm. This can be provided by a polymer tail with a molar mass of 10 kg/mol (25) (see Dispersants). [Pg.547]

Here, A is the depletion layer thickness (assumed equal to the radius of gyration of the polymer, RG). H = r - 2a is the surface-to-surface particle separation, V ° is the molar volume of the solvent, and ji and ji are the solvent chemical potentials for the polymer solution and the pure solvent. It appears that the assumption A = RG is generally acceptable providing that the polymer solution is in the dilute concentration regime. At higher polymer concentrations, however, the value of A is reduced according to the relationship (Vincent, 1990) ... [Pg.102]

The analytical proof assumes that the radius of curvature of the surface is small compared with the thickness of the transition layer between two phases, otherwise the position arbitrarily chosen for XY is of appreciable importance.3 Gibbs proves that the temperature and chemical potentials of the components are uniform throughout the system when equilibrium exists but we shall take this here as self-evident, as indeed it is from a physical standpoint, considering that temperature and potentials are measures of the escaping tendencies of heat and of each component from the different phases, and therefore equalize themselves automatically. The pressures in the different phases are not, however, equal unless the surfaces are strictly plane, as was pointed out in Chap. I, 15. [Pg.109]

An alternative (or just different) description of HPLC retention is based on consideration of the adsorption process instead of partitioning. Adsorption is a process of the analyte concentrational variation (positive or negative) at the interface as a result of the influence of the surface forces. Physical interface between contacting phases (solid adsorbent and liquid mobile phase) is not the same as its mathematical interpretation. The physical interface has certain thickness because the variation of the chemical potential can have very sharp change, but it could not have a break in its derivative at the transition point through the interface. The interface could be considered to have a thickness of one or two monomolecular layers, and in RPLC with chemically modified adsorbents the bonded layer is a monomolecular layer that is more correctly... [Pg.40]

Figure 15. Collapse of simulation data for the effective viscosity versus shear rate as a glass transition is approached by decreasing temperature (circles), increasing normal pressure at fixed number of fluid layers (triangles), or decreasing film thickness at fixed pressure with two different sets of interaction potentials (squares and crosses). The dashed fine has a slope of 0.69. With permission from Ref. 212. Microstructure and Microtribiology of Polymer Surfaces, American Chemical Society, 2000. Figure 15. Collapse of simulation data for the effective viscosity versus shear rate as a glass transition is approached by decreasing temperature (circles), increasing normal pressure at fixed number of fluid layers (triangles), or decreasing film thickness at fixed pressure with two different sets of interaction potentials (squares and crosses). The dashed fine has a slope of 0.69. With permission from Ref. 212. Microstructure and Microtribiology of Polymer Surfaces, American Chemical Society, 2000.
From Table 2 it appears that on passing from carbon black and aerosil to carbosil the thickness of the solvation shell of benzene increases and the hydration film decreases. The studies of changes of chemical potential of water molecules at the adsorbent/bonded wa-ter/ice interface depending on water layer thickness are presented in another paper [57]. For the initial silica the surface effect is confined to the adsorbent water monolayer. Poor carbonization of aerosil surface causes the increase of water layer thickness to 40-50 molecular diameters. With the increase of carbon constituent part on the complex adsorbent surface, the thickness of interfacial water layer decreases to 15 molecular diameters. [Pg.128]

In section 3 the contribution to the surface chemical potentials arising from the field of the potential drop Aif was derived from the combination of classical thermodynamics with the electrostatic theory of dielectrics. This contribution may be alternatively calculated as follows. Suppose that in general an adsorbed layer with M lattice sites, area A and thickness 1 consists of N neutral molecules of the i-th species, i 1, 2,. .., N. If... [Pg.752]

This expression relates the film thickness h (Eq. [18a]) as a function of the chemical potential u and the mean velocity, and is valid only when the liquid viscosity is constant throughout the film. Experimental and theoretical evidence shows a presence of a thin layer with modified viscosity close to the solid surface. Liquid viscosity is elevated relative to bulk liquid due to short- and long-range interfacial forces (Low, 1976,1979 Derjaguin et ah, 1987 McBride Baveye, 1995). Expressions derived by Low (1979) for viscosity profiles of water altered by interfacial forces were recently modified by Or and Wraith (1999) to represent viscosity r in terms of distance from the solid surface ... [Pg.32]

In the above expression Ac is the difference in substance concentration at the particle surface and in the bulk, Ac = c0 [exp(Ap(r)/R7) - 1] c0 = c(r) is the solubility of particles of radius r Ap>0 is the difference in chemical potential between the bulk of initial phase and the solution near the particle surface 8 is an effective diffusion layer thickness. [Pg.297]

Vn is the normal velocity of the surface caused by the atoms redistribution and ps is the surface density of atoms. The surface chemical potential is typically determined by the film elastic energy and surface energy, and as such it is a function of the him local thickness as well as its slope, curvature, and may be higher spahal derivahves (see below). For very thin hlms (a few atomic layers) wetting interactions between the him and the substrate can also become important. These interachons are somewhat similar to wetting interactions between a liquid him and a solid substrate. They are responsible for the presence of an ultra-thin wetting layer of the him material between the islands resulting from the him instabihty and depend on the him thickness and its slope. Naturally, this dependence decays rapidly with the increase of the him thickness. [Pg.127]

I is the double layer thickness and A is the work function difference between that of the actual surface and that of the surface at the potential of zero charge. Therefore, the contribution of the field-dipole interactions to the chemical potential is Pj E. In addition, if we take into account that the adsorbed layer has a regular structure where each adsorption site may be vacant or occupied by a gas molecule, we obtain the following expression for the electrochemical potential of Aj... [Pg.181]


See other pages where Surface layer, chemical potential thickness is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.571]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.86 , Pg.87 ]




SEARCH



Chemical surface

Layer thickness

Layered surfaces

Surface layer thickness

Surface layers

Surface, chemical potential

Thick layers

© 2024 chempedia.info