Surface isopotential

The best strategy to be followed in order to get accurate sets of A values has not been defined, so at present more or less complex statistical elaborations of some data are used. Among the numerical data that have been used we mention solvation and solvent transfer energies, intrinsic solute properties (electron isodensity surfaces, isopotential electronic surfaces, multipole expansions of local charge distribution), isoenergy surfaces for the interaction with selected probes (water, helium atoms), Monte Carlo simulations with solutes of various nature. All these sets of data deserve comments, that are here severely limited not to unduly extend this Section. 

Figure 2-125. Different isovalue-based surfaces of phenylalanine a) isoelectronic density b) molecular orbitals (HOMO-LUMO) c) isopotential surface and d) isosurface of the electron cryo-microscopic volume of the ribosome of Escherichia coii.

In the simplest case of one-dimensional steady flow in the x direction, there is a parallel between Eourier s law for heat flowrate and Ohm s law for charge flowrate (i.e., electrical current). Eor three-dimensional steady-state, potential and temperature distributions are both governed by Laplace s equation. The right-hand terms in Poisson s equation are (.Qy/e) = (volumetric charge density/permittivity) and (Qp // ) = (volumetric heat generation rate/thermal conductivity). The respective units of these terms are (V m ) and (K m ). Representations of isopotential and isothermal surfaces are known respectively as potential or temperature fields. Lines of constant potential gradient ( electric field lines ) normal to isopotential surfaces are similar to lines of constant temperature gradient ( lines of flow ) normal to... 

On the isopotential map three minima (III, IV, V) are separated by barriers. They can be reached by decreasing of the distance R between the educts (I) via an activated complex (II). A detailed discussion of this potential energy surface also under the influence of a solvent will be given in part 4.3.1. 

Figure 7. Top panels Schematic diagram of 3-D cylindrical battery arrays in parallel row (left) and alternating anode/cathode (right) configurations. Middle panels Isopotential lines between cathode (C) and anode (A) for unit battery cells. Bottom panel Current densities (in arbitrary units, a.u.) at the electrode surfaces as a function of the angle 9 (see middle panel for definition of 9). The area of the cathodes and anodes is equal throughout the diagram. (Reprinted with permission from ref 19. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.)...

An interesting alternative to van der Waals cavities is the use of isodensity or isopotential surfaces. Rivail et al. [70] demonstrated that for a given cavity volume, the electron isopotential surface is the one containing the largest electronic density, thus giving a physical meaning to this surface. Nevertheless, isodensity and isopotential cavities are computationally demanding, as they have to be recomputed at each SCF iteration, and are not quite used in practice. 

Current lines are perpendicular to isopotential lines otherwise known as equipotential lines, which are lines of constant potential in two dimensions or surfaces of constant potential in three dimensions. Current lines do not terminate at insulating surfaces. 

Isopotential lines or surfaces are perpendicular to insulator material surfaces because current cannot flow into the insulator. 

Isopotential lines are parallel to the electrode surfaces for what is known as the primary current distribution (no interfacial electrode polarization, or zero polarization resistance). Said another way, the solution adjacent to an electrode surface is an equipotential surface (1). This primary current distribution applies to the case of extremely fast electrochemical reactions (e.g., nonpolar-izable electrode reactions). This current distribution situation is only of interest to the corrosion engineer in cases where high current densities might be flowing (i.e., in relatively nonpolarizable cells). 

Anodes and cathodes need not be separate electrodes but can be areas on the same piece of metal. O Halloran et al. [4] have developed a technique in which isopotential contours on the corroding electrode may be mapped (see Fig. 1). As the technique involves gathering a large number of data points, a microprocessor is used. A small reference electrode is passed across a corroding specimen close to its surface and the potential differences relative to another fixed reference electrode are recorded. The potential profile reflects the ion current density in the vicinity of the corroding surface and... 

More recent attempts to interprete the cesium effects suggest models of differential geometry [99]. So-called periodic ro-potential surfaces ( POPS ) and isopotential surfaces ( TFS , tangential eM OTrface ) of the cesimn ions as templates for organic molecules are proposed. According to these model considerations, an orientation of nonpolar molecular substructures at the zero-potential surface ( POPS ) and an orientation of polar substructures at the isopotential surface ( TFS ), take place, which should favour an intramolecular... 

This observation of Parr and Berk provides the basis for a simple approach to molecular shape analysis and molecular similarity analysis, described below. Although the molecular shapes, as defined by the electronic density, differ somewhat from the shapes of the nuclear potentials, their similarity can be exploited the nuclear potential contour surfaces provide a simple approximation of the shape of molecules. We shall refer to the isopotential surfaces of the nuclear potential contours as NUPCO surfaces. These surfaces have a major advantage the computation of NUPCO s is a trivially simple task as compared to the calculation of electronic densities. Furthermore, nuclear potential is a useful molecular property in its own right, without any reference to electronic density a comparison of NUPCO s of various molecules can provide a valid tool for evaluating molecular similarity. The superposition of potentials of different sets of nuclei can result in similar composite potentials, consequently, the comparison of NUPCO s is better... 

Flow nets consist of two types of lines streamlines and isopotentials. Streamlines are lines that follow the path of representative parcels of water water always flows parallel to streamlines. Isopotentials, drawn perpendicular to streamlines, are lines along which the hydraulic head, h, is constant. Therefore, water always flows perpendicular to isopotentials. Flow nets are often drawn to represent the horizontal movement of groundwater and associated chemicals in an aquifer the plane of the flow net then represents the horizontal aquifer surface, and it is assumed that underneath each point on the surface, flow is essentially the same at all depths in the aquifer. An example of such a flow net is shown in Fig. 3-8. 

Flow boundaries—impermeable surfaces across which flow cannot occur, such as the surfaces of clay lenses, concrete, or buried tanks—should be thought of as streamlines because water flows parallel to them. Like streamlines, flow boundaries are perpendicular to isopotentials. 

FIGURE 18.9 Electric field and concentration gradients for an electrochemical reaction at a catalyst surface the contours indicate the isopotential surfaces in the electrolyte and the arrow marks indicate the flux of the species generated at the catalyst surface (i.e., Y = 1). The scale indicates the conversion. Parameters correspond to the case shown in Figure 18.8b. 

In order to illustrate the above principles, with reference to Fig. 4.1, assume that E"M (anode) = -350 mV(SHE) and E"x (cathode) = -250 mV (SHE). Since (E"x - E"M) is a positive quantity (+100 mV), corrosion will occur. Furthermore, ())s a (anode) = +350 mV, and ())s c (cathode) = +250 mV. Under these conditions, with the use of a SHE reference electrode and assuming a semicircular current path in the solution, experimental measurements with an electrometer—with the positive (high, red) and negative (low, black, common) leads connected as shown—will indicate the potential values shown in Fig. 4.1. In the solution, the potential will vary from +350 mV at the anode to +250 mV at the cathode. In Fig. 4.1, cross sections of constant-potential (isopotential) surfaces are schematically represented as dotted lines at 20 mV increments. 

Figures 4.3(a) and (b) are sections in the zx-plane showing the distribution of potential (( )) in the solution as cross sections of imaginary surfaces in the solution of equal potential (isopotentials) and the distribution of current as current channels with cross sections defined by traces of the surfaces. ..(n - l),n, (n + 1)... perpendicular to the isopotentials. These traces are located such that each current channel carries the same total current. Figure 4.3(a) applies to an environment of higher resistivity (e.g., water with specific resistivity of 1000 ohm-cm) and Fig. 4.3(b) to an environment of lower resistivity (e.g., salt brine, 50ohm-cm). The figures are representative of anodic and cathodic reactions, which, if uncoupled, would have equilibrium half-cell potentials of E M = -1000 mV and E x = 0 mV and would, therefore, produce a thermodynamic driving force of Ecell = E x - E M = +1000 mV. This positive Ecell indicates that corrosion will occur when the reactions are coupled. For the example of Fig. 4.3(a), the high solution resistivity allows the potential E"m at the anode to approach its equilibrium value (E M = -1000 mV) and, therefore, allows the potential in the solution at the anode interface, < )s a, to approach +1000 mV (recall that (j)s = -E"M). The first isopotential above the anode, 900 mV, approaches this value. The solution isopotentials are observed to decrease progressively and approach 0 mV at the cathode reaction site.

Since a major variable governing corrosion is frequently the solution resistivity, emphasis is placed on analyzing qualitatively how this can be an important factor. The flux of current from anode to cathode will follow approximately semicircular channels, perpendicular to the isopotential surfaces, for the simple geometry shown in Fig. 4.3(a) and (b). The current-channel boundary surfaces have been drawn so as to define channels of fluid extending from the anode to the cathode with a... 

Cover picture The molecule depicted on the cover is (+)-milbemycin pa along with its electrostatic isopotential surface. Milbemycin was chosen because the spiroketal portion of the structure was synthesized from both malic and tartaric acids. 

The distribution of electrostatic potential o over molecular surfaces is a useful model for the analysis of chemical reactivity and steric effects. i The shape group method can be adapted to this model, by using values of the electrostatic potential to define the truncations on the molecular surface, The shape description obtained can be used in correlations with biochemical activity. [Note that the analysis of electrostatic isopotential surfaces, whenever closed, can be accomplished by the same method used with isodensity surfaces. The characterization of potential surfaces is relevant to interpreting molecular recognition processes. O i ]... 

FI G U RE 28.10 The electrostatic potential distribution for the model I of hydrated state of silica surface. The p distribution within the plane perpendicular to the water molecule plane is given in upper left part of the picture. Isopotential lines correspond to p values in kJ/mol. 

FIGURE 28.11 The distribution of electrostatic potential for the model II of silica surface hydrated state. Isopotential lines... 

---