Supervisory process, defining

Defining the supervisory process would probably reduce empowerment without authority, because it would define both responsibility and authority to act. Mismatches should become apparent. A lack of clear organizational standards adds to fear, cynicism, and organizational chaos. Again, without standards, employees will view the actions of management as being based on favoritism or luck. 

In the diagram, an arrow points from a barrier that influences to a barrier that is influenced. In some cases, an arrow goes both ways. For example, the supervisory process is difficult to define without standards. At the same time, standards are difficult to establish without a defined supervisory process. Sometimes there is little or no relationship. For example, we saw no obvious relationship between lack of training and education and allowing cultural misfits to remain in the organization. 

The reward process does not appear to be a powerfiil driver here, in spite of being the first place that many organizations focus on attempting to create positive change. The logical implication to be drawn here is that changing the reward process in the absence of defining standards and a supervisory process to maintain them would be ineffective. The implication... 

We proposed to use the organization s established TQM process to define and implement a safety supervisory process. We would begin with an organizational unit that volunteered for the process. We would establish a team, including supervisors, hourly employees, and the plant manager. This team would develop, define, and document a process that could be rolled out across the organization. 

Carroll and Olson define a consistent design as one where a similar task or goal is associated with similar or identical actions [35]. Consistent behavior on the part of the automated controller makes it easier for the human providing supervisory control to learn how the automation works, to build an appropriate process model for it, and to anticipate its behavior. 

Modes define mutually exclusive sets of automation behaviors. Modes can be used to determine how to interpret inputs or to define required controller behavior. Four general types of modes are common controller operating modes, supervisory modes, display modes, and controlled process modes. 

The different tasks performed by the human operator and the constraints associated with their performance depend on the type of process being controlled. Thus, the designer must analyze the operation context in which the supervisory tasks take place, and this to define the operator s informational needs. So the first step of the methodology concerns the study of the process itself, and the analysis of the operator s supervisory tasks (Fig. 2). 

The second part of the work concerns task analysis. It aims first at recognizing the different variables observed by the operator in order to perform supervisory tasks. To carry out this analysis, it is necessary to study the operator s activities in the control room in order to identify his needs and the different problem solving strategies he can use [6]. This analysis must also emphasize the tetiqxnal constraints associated with performing supervisory task. So, the first step, which includes a study of the process and an analysis of the supervisory task constitutes a preliminary work meant to get the interface designer used in the different aspects of the process application, and lead him to defining the functionalities of the interface which needs to be developed. 

TT-106 and FT-106 transmitters report and record the state of target variables and instruct the system to define the desired flow of hot and cold water. Several variants of supervisory controls exist, but it is commonplace to look for a system that uses fuzzy logic to determine the changes in the set point of the process loops. An example of a fuzzy classification of the shower case is as follows ... 

There was a failure by leadership to hold employees at all levels accountable for executing defined processes/procedures. A workplace environment characterized by poor motivation, unclear expectations around supervisory/management behaviors, no clear system of reward and consequences, and high distrust between leadership and the workforce, had developed over a munber of years within the site. The working relationships between leadership and workers, and employees and contractors were poor. 

Training, especially in relation to safety responsibilities, is essential. The process outhned in Section 7.2.1 above provides a sound and systematic basis on which to define the (safety) training needs analysis for all those supervisory and first-line management roles allocated safety responsibihties. 

---