Supercooled liquid water

The preceding observations stimulated Olander and Rice 4> to search for a substance that is simultaneously simpler" than water yet a "good model of it. They suggested that amorphous solid water [H O/as)], first reported by Burton and Oliver 5> in 1935, satisfied these two requirements. Unlike the liquid, amorphous solid water can be studied at low temperature where the effects of thermal excitation and positional and orientational disorder can be separated. Moreover, it is plausible to accept as a working hypothesis that the amorphous solid is, essentially, extensively supercooled liquid water if so, the properties of the amorphous solid should be directly related to those of the liquid. 

Most recently, Gallagher et al.21 measured the water uptake of Nafion membrane under subfreezing temperatures, which showed a significant reduction in the maximum water content corresponding to membrane full hydration. The Nafion membrane with 1,100 equivalent weight, for example, uptakes A 8 of water at -25°C when it equilibrates with vapor over ice because of the low vapor pressure of ice compared to supercooled liquid water. They also found the electro-osmotic drag coefficient to be 1 for Nafion membrane under sub freezing temperatures. 

LDA and HDA were interpreted to be similar to two limiting structural states of supercooled liquid water up to pressures of 0.6 GPa and down to 208 K. In this interpretation, the liquid structure at high pressure is nearly independent of temperature, and it is remarkably similar to the known structure of HDA. At a low pressure, the liquid structure approaches the structure of LDA as temperature decreases [180-182]. The hydrogen bond network in HDA is deformed strongly in a manner analogous to that found in water at high temperatures, whereas the pair correlation function of LDA is closer to that of supercooled water [183], At ambient conditions, water was suggested to be a mixture of HDA-like and LDA-like states in an approximate proportion 2 3 [184-186],... 

Very pure liquid water can be supercooled at atmospheric pressure to temperatures well below 0°C. Assume that 1 kg has been cooled as a liquid to -6 C. A small ice crystal (of negligible mass) is added to seed" the supercooled liquid. If the subsequent change occurs adiabatically at atmospheric pressure, what fraction of the system freezes and what is the final temperature What is 5,ou] for the process, and what is its irreversible feature The latent heat of fusion of water at 0°C = 333.4 J g l, and the specific heat of supercooled liquid water = 4.226 J g-1 °C I. 

Collection of supercooled liquid water in clouds is simple, using only a plate or screen exposed to RAM air the water is later melted and stored prior to analysis (6 ). Collection of frozen cloud particles is a little more problematical since the liquid water content can be low, and individual particles are more subject to bounce-off during impactive collection. Collection of snow particles aboard the aircraft is most difficult of all due to the low aerodynamic diameter exhibited by these particles in RAM air streams. Successful methods for the collection of snow and ice clouds are still in an active stage of development. 

TABLE 2-4 Vapor Pressure of Supercooled Liquid Water from 0 to 0 C ... 

Simulations essentially extend possibility to study supercooled liquid water, as crystallization may be suppressed. However, there is no water model, which adequately reproduces phase diagram of water and its properties even in the thermodynamic region, where experimental data are available. In such situation, only comparative analysis of the results, obtained for various water models, can give information, relevant for the behaviour of real water in supercooled region. Additional complication appears due to the necessity to use sophisticated simulation methods, appropriate for the studies of the phase transitions, such as Monte Carlo simulations in the grand canonical or in the Gibbs ensemble (see Refs.7,16 for more details). Note, that simulations in the simple constant-volume or constant-pressure ensembles, widely used in the studies of supercooled water (see, for example Refs. 17,18), are not appropriate for the location of the phase transitions. 

One mole of supercooled liquid water at -5°C freezes to ice in a well-insulated vessel containing kerosene at a temperature of -5°C ... 

B. Jana and B. Bagchi, Intermittent dynamics, stochastic resonance and dynamical heterogeneity in supercooled liquid water. J. Phys. Chem. B (Lett.), 113 (2009), 2221-2224. 

From these evidences, I believed the discontinuity of the LDA HDA transition (the arrow-1 of Fig. 12b) and the thermodynamic connection between HDA and liquid water (the arrow-2 of Fig. 12b). This was the reason why I believed the LLCP hypothesis shown by the broken line-3 of Fig. 12b. The hypothesis seemed the simplest explanation for these experimental results. However, these evidences did not offer decisive proofs and, therefore, confusion of explanations existed. Although we could not affirm the discontinuity between LDA and HDA, and although some researchers suspected that HDA, the collapsed ice Ij, might be microcrystalline, I began the experiments of the supercooled liquid water in order to search for the hypothetical LLCP (or paradoxically for a clear disproof of LLCP). Here, I always used the emulsified sample to hinder both the crystallization of the liquid and the crystal-crystal transition. The surfactant of the emulsion hardly dissolved in water, and the thermodynamic data of the emulsified water were practically the same as those of pure water in the region of overlap. 

Figure 1 also shows a P p isotherm for the liquid phase of WAG silica. Notably, this isotherm also exhibits an inflection, indicating the presence of a compressibility maximum in the liquid state [19]. In simulations of supercooled liquid water, the same thermodynamic feature occms, and as T decreases, the compressibility maximum in simulated water grows into a divergence at a critical point [20]. Below the temperatme of this critical point, two thermodynamically distinct liquid phases of simulated water occur, each with a distinct density, reflecting the occurrence of a first order LLPT. 

In Figure 11-1 the lines below and to the left of the hydrate/ice formation line represent a meta-stable equilibrium between water vapor in the gas phase and supercooled liquid water. The actual equilibrium with solid ice or hydrate is at a lower water content. The effect is depicted in Figure 11-3, which also extends the water content scale of Figure 11-1 down to 0.1 lb water/MMscf. The data on equilibrium water contents in the 0.1 to 1.0 lb water/MMscf range are necessary for the design of the recently developed superdehydration processes. Water content data down to as low as 0.001 Ib/MMscf are plotted by Buck-lin et al. (1985). Such extremely low values are of interest in the design of natural gas turboexpander plants. 

Temperature dependences of the fraction of water molecules with tetrahedral arrangement of the nearest four neighbors in liquid water calculated at the liquid-vapor coexistence curve for two water models are shown in Fig. 5. There are less than 10% of such water molecules at the liquid-vapor critical point. Upon cooling, more water molecules gain tetrahedral ordering and their fraction achieves 50% at ambient conditions. At some temperatures below the freezing temperature, fraction of tetrahedrally ordered water molecules in supercooled liquid water shows a rapid or even a stepwise increase. 

I. Brovchenko, A. Oleinikova, Phases of supercooled liquid water, in W. Kuhs (ed.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Physics and Chemistry of Ice, Cambridge, England Cambridge Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007, pp. 117-124. 

IAPWS-95 is now the state of the art and the international standard for representing water s thermodynamic properties at temperatures from its freezing point to 1000°C and at pressures up to 1000 MPa. It also extrapolates in a physically meaningful manner outside this range, including the supercooled liquid water region. The uncertainties in the properties produced by IAPWS-95 are comparable to those of the best available experimental data this is quite accurate in some cases (for example, relative uncertainty of 10 for liquid densities at atmospheric pressure and near-ambient temperatures) and less so where the data are less certain (for example, relative uncertainty of 2 x 10 for most vapor heat... 

---