Sulfur nucleophiles stereochemistry

An unexpected endo selectivity in addition of certain carbon and sulfur nucleophiles to the O, / -unsaturated (arene)ruthenium(II)cyclopentadienyl compound (154) has been reported. This stereochemistry has been compared with that of the 5 n2 reactions but a detailed theoretical approach is yet to be undertaken. ... 

This looks complicated but it s just a question of working through each reaction. The stereochemistry needs some thought. The first reaction is a conjugate addition of a sulfur nucleophile to a very electrophilic alkene. The base used, piperidine, is an ordinary secondary amine but that is basic enough (pKaH about 11) to produce reasonable amounts of anion from the thiol pfCa also about 10). There is no stereochemistry in this step. 

Electrophilic attack on the sulfur atom of thiiranes by alkyl halides does not give thiiranium salts but rather products derived from attack of the halide ion on the intermediate cyclic salt (B-81MI50602). Treatment of a s-2,3-dimethylthiirane with methyl iodide yields cis-2-butene by two possible mechanisms (Scheme 31). A stereoselective isomerization of alkenes is accomplished by conversion to a thiirane of opposite stereochemistry followed by desulfurization by methyl iodide (75TL2709). Treatment of thiiranes with alkyl chlorides and bromides gives 2-chloro- or 2-bromo-ethyl sulfides (Scheme 32). Intramolecular alkylation of the sulfur atom of a thiirane may occur if the geometry is favorable the intermediate sulfonium ions are unstable to nucleophilic attack and rearrangement may occur (Scheme 33). 

Stereoselective epoxidation can be realized through either substrate-controlled (e.g. 35 —> 36) or reagent-controlled approaches. A classic example is the epoxidation of 4-t-butylcyclohexanone. When sulfonium ylide 2 was utilized, the more reactive ylide irreversibly attacked the carbonyl from the axial direction to offer predominantly epoxide 37. When the less reactive sulfoxonium ylide 1 was used, the nucleophilic addition to the carbonyl was reversible, giving rise to the thermodynamically more stable, equatorially coupled betaine, which subsequently eliminated to deliver epoxide 38. Thus, stereoselective epoxidation was achieved from different mechanistic pathways taken by different sulfur ylides. In another case, reaction of aldehyde 38 with sulfonium ylide 2 only gave moderate stereoselectivity (41 40 = 1.5/1), whereas employment of sulfoxonium ylide 1 led to a ratio of 41 40 = 13/1. The best stereoselectivity was accomplished using aminosulfoxonium ylide 25, leading to a ratio of 41 40 = 30/1. For ketone 42, a complete reversal of stereochemistry was observed when it was treated with sulfoxonium ylide 1 and sulfonium ylide 2, respectively. ... 

The favorable stereochemistry and the displacement of the very good leaving group promoted the formation of a [3.2.0] bicyclic intermediate (see Scheme 2). Owing to the absence of a C2 symmetry axis two different [3.2.0] bicyclic sulfonium salt intermediates, 8a and 8b, can be generated by nucleophilic transannular attack of sulfur on the... 

The nucleophilic attack on an acceptor-substituted allene can also take place at the acceptor itself, especially in the case of carbonyl groups of aldehydes, ketones or esters. Allenic esters are reduced to the corresponding primary alcohols by means of diisobutylaluminum hydride [18] and the synthesis of a vinylallene (allenene) by Peterson olefination of an allenyl ketone has also been reported [172]. The nucleophilic attack of allenylboranes 189 on butadienals 188 was investigated intensively by Wang and co-workers (Scheme 7.31) [184, 203, 248, 249]. The stereochemistry of the obtained secondary alcohol 190 depends on the substitution pattern. Fortunately, the synthesis of the desired Z-configured hepta-l,2,4-trien-6-ynes 191 is possible both by syn-elimination with the help of potassium hydride and by anti-elimination induced by sulfuric acid. Analogous allylboranes instead of the allenes 189 can be reacted also with the aldehydes 188 [250]. 

Reactivity toward nucleophiles and comparison with other electrophilic centers 152 Paths for nucleophilic substitution of sulfonyl derivatives 156 Direct substitution at sulfonyl sulfur stereochemistry 157 Direct substitution at sulfonyl sulfur stepwise or concerted 158 The elimination-addition path for substitution of alkanesulfonyl derivatives 166 Homolytic decomposition of a-disulfones 172 10 Concluding remarks 173 Acknowledgement 174 References 174... 

Reaction of a sulfinyl sulfone with a nucleophile in the manner shown in (139) is, of course, an example of a nucleophilic substitution at sulfinyl sulfur. Reactions of this general type occur frequently and are of great importance in the chemistry of most kinds of sulfinic acid derivatives. At this point it would seem desirable to discuss what is known about such key aspects of their mechansim as stereochemistry and the timing of the bond-making and bond-breaking processes necessary in such a substitution. In doing this we will call upon results obtained from the study of such reactions using a variety of different types of sulfinic acid derivatives. 

However, the major factor stimulating the rapid development of static and dynamic sulfur stereochemistry was the interest in the mechanism and steric course of nucleophilic substitution reactions at chiral sulfur. Very recently, chiral organic sulfur compounds have attracted much attention as useful and efficient reagents in asymmetric synthesis. 

The replacement of the oxygen atom in sulfoxides by nitrogen leads to a new class of chiral sulfur compounds, namely, sulfimides, which recently have attracted considerable attention in connection with the stereochemistry of sulfoxide-sulfimide-sulfoximide conversion reactions and with the steric course of nucleophilic substitution at sulfur. The first examples of chiral sulfimides, 88 and 89, were prepared and resolved into enantiomers by Phillips (127,128) by means of the brucine and cinchonidine salts as early as 1927. In the same way, Kresze and Wustrow (129) were able to separate the enantiomers of other structurally related sulfimides. 

The most frequently encountered reactions in organic sulfur chemistry are nucleophilic displacement reactions. The mechanism and steric course of reactions have been the main points of interest of research groups all over the world, in particular, Andersen, Cram, Johnson, and Mislow in the United States Kobayashi and Oae in Japan Kjaer in Denmark and Fava and Montanari in Italy. The results of these investigators have been discussed exhaustively in many reviews on sulfur stereochemistry. In a recent report on nucleophilic substitution at tricoordinate sulfur, the literature was covered by Tillett (10) to the end of 1975. Therefore only some representative examples of nucleophilic substitution reactions at chiral sulfur are discussed here. However, recent results obtained in the authors laboratory are included. 

In contrast to the widely investigated stereochemistry of nucleophilic substitution at optically active tricoordinate sulfur, there have been few similar studies with optically active tetracoordinate sulfur systems. Sabol and Andersen (174) were the first to show that the reaction of p-tolylmagnesium bromide with (-)-menthyl phenyl-methane[ 0- 0]sulfonate 140 proceeds with inversion of configuration. Thus, the Grignard reaction at the sulfinyl and sulfonyl centers takes place with the same stereochemistry. 

We hope that this review of chiral sulfur compounds will be useful to chemists interested in various aspects of chemistry and stereochemistry. The facts and problems discussed provide numerous possibilities for the study of additional stereochemical phenomena at sulfur. As a consequence of the extent of recent research on the application of oiganosulfur compounds in synthesis, further developments in the field of sulfur stereochemistry and especially in the area of asymmetric synthesis may be expected. Looking to the future, it may be said that the static and dynamic stereochemistry of tetra- and pentacoordinate trigonal-bipyramidal sulfur compounds will be and should be the subject of further studies. Similarly, more investigations will be needed to clarify the complex nature of nucleophilic substitution at tri- and tetracoordinate sulfur. Finally, we note that this chapter was intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive therefore, we apologize to the authors whose important work could not be included. 

Organosulfur chemistry is presently a particularly dynamic subject area. The stereochemical aspects of this field are surveyed by M. Mikojajczyk and J. Drabowicz. in the fifth chapter, entitled Qural Organosulfur Compounds. The synthesis, resolution, and application of a wide range of chiral sulfur compounds are described as are the determination of absolute configuration and of enantiomeric purity of these substances. A discussion of the dynamic stereochemistry of chiral sulfur compounds including racemization processes follows. Finally, nucleophilic substitution on and reaction of such compounds with electrophiles, their use in asymmetric synthesis, and asymmetric induction in the transfer of chirality from sulfur to other centers is discussed in a chapter that should be of interest to chemists in several disciplines, in particular synthetic and natural product chemistry. 

---