Resonance substituent effect

Swain C G and E C Lupton 1968. Field and Resonance Components of Substituent Effects. Journal of tl American Chemical Society 90 4328-4337. 

Swain C G, S H Unger, N R Rosenquist and M S Swain 1983. Substituent Effects on Chemical Reactivib Improved Evaluation of Field and Resonance Components. Journal of the American Chemical Sociei 105 492-502. 

A familiar feature of the electronic theory is the classification of substituents, in terms of the inductive and conjugative or resonance effects, which it provides. Examples from substituents discussed in this book are given in table 7.2. The effects upon orientation and reactivity indicated are only the dominant ones, and one of our tasks is to examine in closer detail how descriptions of substituent effects of this kind meet the facts of nitration. In general, such descriptions find wide acceptance, the more so since they are now known to correspond to parallel descriptions in terms of molecular orbital theory ( 7.2.2, 7.2.3). Only in respect of the interpretation to be placed upon the inductive effect is there still serious disagreement. It will be seen that recent results of nitration studies have produced evidence on this point ( 9.1.1). 

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. 

The more extensive problem of correlating substituent effects in electrophilic substitution by a two-parameter equation has been examined by Brown and his co-workers. In order to define a new set of substituent constants. Brown chose as a model reaction the solvolysis of substituted dimethylphenylcarbinyl chlorides in 90% aq. acetone. In the case ofp-substituted compounds, the transition state, represented by the following resonance structures, is stabilized by direct resonance interaction between the substituent and the site of reaction. 

Representative chemical shifts from the large amount of available data on isothiazoles are included in Table 4. The chemical shifts of the ring hydrogens depend on electron density, ring currents and substituent anisotropies, and substituent effects can usually be predicted, at least qualitatively, by comparison with other aromatic systems. The resonance of H(5) is usually at a lower field than that of H(3) but in some cases this order is reversed. As is discussed later (Section 4.17.3.4) the chemical shift of H(5) is more sensitive to substitution in the 4-position than is that of H(3), and it is also worth noting that the resonance of H(5) is shifted downfield (typically 0.5 p.p.m.) when DMSO is used as solvent, a reflection of the ability of this hydrogen atom to interact with proton acceptors. This matter is discussed again in Section 4.17.3.7. 

Substituent effects (substituent increments) tabulated in more detail in the literature demonstrate that C chemical shifts of individual carbon nuclei in alkenes and aromatic as well as heteroaromatic compounds can be predicted approximately by means of mesomeric effects (resonance effects). Thus, an electron donor substituent D [D = OC//j, SC//j, N(C//j)2] attached to a C=C double bond shields the (l-C atom and the -proton (+M effect, smaller shift), whereas the a-position is deshielded (larger shift) as a result of substituent electronegativity (-/ effect). 

The assignment of resonances in Table 14.2 results from summation of substituent effects as listed in Table 14.1. The data refer to conformer I for conformer II the C atoms pairs C-l/C-2, C-3/C-6, C-4/C-5 and C-7/C-8 change places. 

Notice that the MO picture gives the same qualitative picture of the substituent effects as described by resonance structures. The amino group is pictured by resonance as an electron donor which causes a buildup of electron density at the /3 carbon, whereas the formyl group is an electron acceptor which diminishes electron density at the /3 carbon. 

Fig. 4.3. Resonance, field, and inductive components of substituent effects in substituted benzenes.

In general, the dissection of substituertt effects need not be limited to resonance and polar components, vdiich are of special prominence in reactions of aromatic compounds.. ny type of substituent interaction with a reaction center could be characterized by a substituent constant characteristic of the particular type of interaction and a reaction parameter indicating the sensitivity of the reaction series to that particular type of interactioa For example, it has been suggested that electronegativity and polarizability can be treated as substituent effects separate from polar and resonance effects. This gives rise to the equation... 

The substituent effects in aromatic electrophilic substitution are dominated by resonance effects. In other systems, stereoelectronic effects or steric effects might be more important. Whatever the nature of the substituent effects, the Hammond postulate insists diat structural discussion of transition states in terms of reactants, intermediates, or products is valid only when their structures and energies are similar. 

Another example of enhanced sensitivity to substituent effects in the gas phase can be seen in a comparison of the gas-phase basicity for a series of substituted acetophenones and methyl benzoates. It was foimd that scnsitivtiy of the free energy to substituent changes was about four times that in solution, as measured by the comparison of A( for each substituent. The gas-phase data for both series were correlated by the Yukawa-Tsuno equation. For both series, the p value was about 12. However, the parameter r" ", which reflects the contribution of extra resonance effects, was greater in the acetophenone series than in the methyl benzoate series. This can be attributed to the substantial resonance stabilization provided by the methoxy group in the esters, which diminishes the extent of conjugation with the substituents. 

How do you interpret the values of p and r in these equations Which system is more sensitive to the aryl substituent How would you explain this difference in sensitivity Sketch the resonance, field and hyperconjugative interactions which you believe would contribute to these substituent effects. What, if any, geometric constraints would these interactions place on the ions ... 

Because the substituent groups have a direct resonance interaction with the charge that develops in the a-complex, quantitative substituent effects exhibit a high resonance component. Hammett equations usually correlate best with the substituent constants (see Section 4.3). ... 

The net effect is, therefore, a balance of these two components. Some of the results of the separation may be surprising, such as the relatively small contribution that resonance makes to the overall substituent effect of p-NOj. Another interesting result is the predominant resonance contribution in the alkyl series this (if real) must be attributed to hyperconjugation. 

The general chemical reasonableness of the results in Table 7-7 is gratifying, but this does not constitute a demonstration that the separation of substituent effects into inductive effects and resonance effects is quantitatively possible, for these effects may interact so as to be nonadditive. Ritchie and Sager express reservations about the approach in general, and other authors " have criticized results based on Eqs. (7-33) and (7-34). 

Physical and chemical evidence supporting the theory mentioned in the foregoing will be given in the appropriate sections. Some predic-. tions may be mentioned here. From resonance structures (2, 3, 7, 8) it is inferred that the substituent effect in 2-substituted thiophenes should be parallel to that in the corresponding benzenes, the 3- and 5-positions may be considered as ortho and para positions and the 4-position as a meta position. It is, however, obvious that the effect of a —M- and a d-M-substituent are not simply reversed, as reso-... 

Substituent Reactivity Orienting effect Inductive effect Resonance effect... 

HMO calculations have been ultilized in the search for substituted thiepins liable to be good candidates for synthesis due to electronic substituent effects.7 Based on these results, the presence of at least two carboxy groups and one fluorine group give an increased resonance energy per electron to positive values, indicating at least some thermal stability. 

In common with a number of heterocyclic iodinations, kinetic effects are found in the iodination of indole and 2-methylindole [68AC(R)1435], When the substituent effects for the reaction are examined it is clear that any resonance effects from the fused benzene ring are only poorly relayed to the reactive 3-position, and the rates appear to be controlled by inductive effects. A 5-methyl group was more activating than 5-methoxy [69AC(R)799]. 

---