Sublibrary

Fig. 3-2. Semipreparative RP-HPLC profile of eyelo(Arg-Lys-X-Pro-X-Ala). The erude sublibrary (160 mol) was dissolved in 0.1 % (v/v) TFA and applied to a Whatman Partisil 10 pm ODS-2 (1 x 50 em) eolumn. The peaks were eluted using a 40-min linear gradient of 0-25 % aeetonitrile in water at a flowrate of 7 mL min . Fractions were collected every 2 min and pooled in three fractions as indicated by arrows 130 pmol of peptides was reeovered (yield 81 %). (Reprinted with permission from ref. [75]. Copyright 1998, Ameriean Chemieal Soeiety.)...

Since the proline residue in peptides facilitates the cyclization, 3 sublibraries each containing 324 compounds were prepared with proline in each randomized position. Resolutions of 1.05 and 2.06 were observed for the CE separation of racemic DNP-glutamic acid using peptides with proline located on the first and second random position, while the peptide mixture with proline preceding the (i-alamine residue did not exhibit any enantioselectivity. Since the c(Arg-Lys-0-Pro-0-(i-Ala) library afforded the best separation, the next deconvolution was aimed at defining the best amino acid at position 3. A rigorous deconvolution process would have required the preparation of 18 libraries with each amino acid residue at this position. 

However, the use of a HPLC separation step enabled a remarkable acceleration of the deconvolution process. Instead of preparing all of the sublibraries, the c(Arg-Lys-O-Pro-O-P-Ala) library was fractionated on a semipreparative HPLC column and three fractions as shown in Fig. 3-2 were collected and subjected to amino acid analysis. According to the analysis, the least hydrophobic fraction, which eluted first, did not contain peptides that included valine, methionine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine residues and also did not exhibit any separation ability for the tested racemic amino acid derivatives (Table 3-1). 

Table 3-1. Values of enantiomeric resolution of DNP-amino acids in a running electrolyte containing the three fractions 1, 2, and 3 of the cyclo(Arg-Lys-X-Pro-X-(3 Ala) sublibrary separated by preparative HPLC.

Fig. 3-3. Comparison of the values of enantiomeric resolution of different DNP-D,L-amino acids at different deconvolution stages of a cyclic hexapeptide sublibrary. Resolution values in a cyclo(Arg-Lys-X-X-X-P-Ala) sublibrary, in the first line, are compared to those obtained in sublibraries with a progressively increasing number of defined positions. All the sublibraries were 30 mM in the running buffer while the completely defined cyclo(Arg-Lys-Tyr-P-Tyr-P-Ala) peptide is used at 10 mM concentration. Conditions cyclopeptide sublibrary in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 capillary, 50 pm i.d., 65 cm total length, 57 cm to the window V = -20 kV, I = 40 electrokinetic injection, -10 kV, 3 s detection at 340 nm. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [75]. Copyright 1998, American Chemical Society.)...

Fig. 3-12. Selectivity factors for the separations of sublibraries of racemic ethyl (6-methyl-) and (ethyl 1,6-dimethyl) 2-oxo-4-substituted-l,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylates. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [55]. Copyright 1999, American Chemical Society.)...

The substantial difference between these two chromatograms was a clear proof that CSP 13 interacted differently with the mixtures of l and d enantiomers. This also indicated the presence of at least one pair of enantiomers that interacted selectively with the CSP. Unfortunately, a tedious synthesis of 16 sublibraries (eight l and eight d) containing decreasing numbers of blocks had to be prepared to deconvolute the best selector. A comparison of the chromatograms obtained from these sublibraries in each deconvolution step was used again, and those selectors for which no difference was observed were eliminated. This procedure enabled the identification... 

Our strategy consisted of the following steps A mixture of potential chiral selectors is immobilized on a solid support and packed to afford a complete-library column , which is tested in the resolution of targeted racemic compounds. If some separation is achieved, the column should be deconvoluted to identify the selector possessing the highest selectivity. The deconvolution consisted in the stepwise preparation of a series of sublibrary columns of lower diversity, each of which constitute a CSP with a reduced number of library members. 

The rapid increase in the separation factors observed for the individual series of columns reflected not only the improvement in the intrinsic selectivities of the individual selectors but also the effect of increased loading with the most potent selector. Although the overall loading determined from nitrogen content remained virtually constant at about 0.7 mmol g for all CSPs, the fractional loading of each selector increased as the number of selectors in the mixture decreased. Thus, the whole method of building block selection and sublibrary synthesis can be also viewed as an amplification process. 

Kim U.J., Shizuya H., Deaven L., Chen X.N., Korenberg J.R., Simon M.I., Selection of a sublibrary enriched for a chromosome from total human bacterial artificial chromosome library using dna from flow-sorted chromosomes as hybridization probes. Nucl. Acids. Res. 1995 23 1838-1839. 

A complete set of sublibraries, 15 containing 72 compounds each and 6 containing 20 compounds each, were prepared in a similar manner, with comparable yields (37-75%). 

This procedure can consist of different stages with one sublibrary being constructed at each stage. The first one enables the identification of the product within an ample library, a second defines a characteristic that produces an important variability in the spectra (e.g. particle size) and a third defines a smaller spectral variability (difference in the content of impurities, origin of manufacture, etc.). 

Once the general library has been constructed, those products requiring the second identification step are pinpointed and the most suitable method for constructing each sublibrary required is chosen. Sublibraries can be constructed using various algorithms including the Mahalanobis distance or the residual variance. The two are complementary, so which is better for the intended purpose should be determined on an individual basis. 

External validation. The general library and its sublibraries must be validated by checking that external spectra (for the validation step) are correctly, unambiguously identified. Likewise, samples not present in the library should not be identified with any of the compounds it contains. 

Raw materials Correlation coefficient, Mahalanobis distance, residual variance Libraries and sublibraries 63... 

As proof of principle, Lehn and coworkers individually synthesized all acyl hydrazone combinations from the 13 DCL building blocks and measured their inhibition of acetylthiocholine hydrolysis by ACE in a standard assay. They then established a dynamic deconvolution approach whereby the pre-equilibrated DCL containing all members is prepared, frozen, and assayed. Thirteen sublibraries were then prepared containing all components minus one hydrazide or aldehyde component, and assayed. Active components in the DCL were quickly identified by an increase in ACE activity, observed in sublibraries missing either hydrazide 7 or dialdehyde i, pointing to the bis-acyl hydrazone 7-i-7 as the most likely active constituent. This was in line with the individual assay data recorded earlier resynthesis of this compound characterized it as a low nanomolar inhibitor of the enzyme. 

---