Styrene emulsion particle size

Monomer compositional drifts may also occur due to preferential solution of the styrene in the mbber phase or solution of the acrylonitrile in the aqueous phase (72). In emulsion systems, mbber particle size may also influence graft stmcture so that the number of graft chains per unit of mbber particle surface area tends to remain constant (73). Factors affecting the distribution (eg, core-sheU vs "wart-like" morphologies) of the grafted copolymer on the mbber particle surface have been studied in emulsion systems (74). Effects due to preferential solvation of the initiator by the polybutadiene have been described (75,76). 

In addition to graft copolymer attached to the mbber particle surface, the formation of styrene—acrylonitrile copolymer occluded within the mbber particle may occur. The mechanism and extent of occluded polymer formation depends on the manufacturing process. The factors affecting occlusion formation in bulk (77) and emulsion processes (78) have been described. The use of block copolymers of styrene and butadiene in bulk systems can control particle size and give rise to unusual particle morphologies (eg, coil, rod, capsule, cellular) (77). 

Hayashi et al., 1989], involving the addition of monomer and initiator to a previously prepared emulsion of polymer particles, is especially useful for this purpose since it allows the variation of certain reaction parameters while holding N constant. Thus, h in seeded styrene polymerization drops from 0.5 to 0.2 when the initiator concentration decreases from 10-2 to 1CT5 M. At sufficiently low Ru the rate of radical absorption is not sufficiently high to counterbalance the rate of desorption. One also observes that above a particular initiation rate ([I] = lO-2 M in this case), the system maintains case 2 behavior with h constant at 0.5 and Rp independent of Ri. A change in Ri simply results in an increased rate of alternation of activity and inactivity in each polymer particle. Similar experiments show that h drops below 0.5 for styrene when the particle size becomes sufficiently small. The extent of radical desorption increases with decreasing particle size since the travel distance for radical diffusion from a particle decreases. 

Case 3 behavior occurs when the particle size is sufficiently large (about 0.1-1 pm) relative to kt such that two or more radicals can coexist in a polymer particle without instantaneous termination. This effect is more pronounced as the particle size and percent conversion increase. At high conversion the particle size increases and k, decreases, leading to an increase in h. The increase in h occurs at lower conversions for the larger-sized particles. Thus for styrene polymerization it increases from 0.5 to only 0.6 at 90% conversion for 0.7-pm particles. On the other hand, for 1.4-pm particles, n increases to about 1 at 80% conversion and more than 2 at 90% conversion [Chatterjee et al., 1979 Gerrens, 1959]. Much higher values of h have been reported in other emulsion polymerizations [Ballard et al., 1986 Mallya and Plamthottam, 1989]. Methyl methacrylate has a more pronounced Trommsdorff effect than styrene and vinyl acetate, and this results in a more exaggerated tendency toward case 3 behavior for methyl methacrylate. 

Most ABS is made by emulsion polymerization. A polybutadiene or nitrile rubber latex is prepared, and styrene plus acrylonitrile are grafted upon the elastomer in emulsion. The effect of rubber particle size in ABS graft copolymer on physical properties is the subject Chapter 22 by C. F. Parsons and E. L. Suck. Methyl methacrylate was substituted for acrylonitrile in ABS by R. D. Deanin and co-workers. They found a better thermoprocessability, lighter color, and better ultraviolet light stability. 

Several methodologies for preparation of monodisperse polymer particles are known [1]. Among them, dispersion polymerization in polar media has often been used because of the versatility and simplicity of the process. So far, the dispersion polymerizations and copolymerizations of hydrophobic classical monomers such as styrene (St), methyl methacrylate (MMA), etc., have been extensively investigated, in which the kinetic, molecular weight and colloidal parameters could be controlled by reaction conditions [6]. The preparation of monodisperse polymer particles in the range 1-20 pm is particularly challenging because it is just between the limits of particle size of conventional emulsion polymerization (100-700 nm) and suspension polymerization (20-1000 pm). 

Figure 2. Styrene emulsion polymerization—instantaneous rate data for mono-dispersed latices showing the effect of particle size (—LHp = 16.4 kcal/gmol)...

We will describe its use for controlling the styrene-acrylonitrile emulsion copolymerization system. Results concerning copolymer compositions, molecular characteristics and particle sizes will be compared to the corresponding ones from batch or semi-continuous processes. 

Kobayashi et al. [143-146] have synthesized several types of amphiphilic po-ly(2-oxazoline), 34 and its block cooligomers, 53-55, and applied them to soap-free emulsion copolymerization of styrene and vinyl acetate to produce mono-disperse, submicron-sized latex particles. They found that the particle size significantly depended on the type of macromonomer used and generally decreased with increasing the macromonomer concentration. 

The cationic Surfmers produced much smaller particle sizes in the emulsion polymerization of styrene and styrene/butyl acrylate than the amphoterics (20-50 nm versus 100-300 nm). Some of the latter, however, conferred to the copolymer lattices stability to electrolytes and freeze-thaw [24]. Similar, but nonreactive surfactants produced from succinic anhydride gave similar stability but had much inferior water resistance [25]. 

In Fig. 8 the calorimetric curve of a typical miniemulsion polymerization for 100-nm droplets consisting of styrene as monomer and hexadecane as hydrophobe with initiation from the water phase is shown. Three distinguished intervals can be identified throughout the course of miniemulsion polymerization. According to Harkins definition for emulsion polymerization [59-61], only intervals I and III are found in the miniemulsion process. Additionally, interval IV describes a pronounced gel effect, the occurrence of which depends on the particle size. Similarly to microemulsions and some emulsion polymerization recipes [62], there is no interval II of constant reaction rate. This points to the fact that diffusion of monomer is in no phase of the reaction the rate-determining step. 

Complex colloids can be characterized advantageously by a combination of Fl-FFF with different analytical or other FFF techniques, yielding supplemental information. Examples reported in the literature are combinations of Fl-FFF and S-FFF for size (Fl-FFF) and density (S-FFF) as well as the thickness and density of the shell of core shell latexes [402],El-FFF for the charge and composition of emulsions [403],Th-FFF for the characterization of the size and composition of core shell latexes [404] and, finally, with SEC for the particle size distribution and stoichiometry of gelatin complexes with poly(styrene sulfonate) and poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate) [405]. 

We hav shown that with the use of a mixed surfactant system in styrene emulsion polymerization, the composition of the mixed surfactant has an effect on the rate of polymerization, the number of particles formed and the particle size distribution. We have also shown that a change in the ratio, r of the two surfactants in the mixture results in a considerable change in the micellar weight of the resultant mixed micelles. We have thus proposed and proven that the efficiency of nucleation of particles (even when the same number of micelles is used in the experiment) is dependent on the size of the mixed micelle, and that there is an optimum size at which the polymerization rate is the fastest and the particle size distribution is the narrowest. 

It is well known that in the emulsion polymerization of styrene, particle size and size distribution can be varied bv changing the amount of emulsifier, the initiator concentration, the ratio of monomer... 

Polystyrene can be easily prepared by emulsion or suspension techniques. Harkins (1 ), Smith and Ewart(2) and Garden ( ) have described the mechanisms of emulsTon polymerization in batch reactors, and the results have been extended to a series of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR)( o Much information on continuous emulsion reactors Ts documented in the patent literature, with such innovations as use of a seed latex (5), use of pulsatile flow to reduce plugging of the tube ( ), and turbulent flow to reduce plugging (7 ). Feldon (8) discusses the tubular polymerization of SBR rubber wTth laminar flow (at Reynolds numbers of 660). There have been recent studies on continuous stirred tank reactors utilizing Smith-Ewart kinetics in a single CSTR ( ) as well as predictions of particle size distribution (10). Continuous tubular reactors have been examined for non-polymeric reactions (1 1 ) and polymeric reactions (12.1 31 The objective of this study was to develop a model for the continuous emulsion polymerization of styrene in a tubular reactor, and to verify the model with experimental data. 

The objective was to develop a model for continuous emulsion polymerization of styrene in tubular reactors which predicts the radial and axial profiles of temperature and concentration, and to verify the model using a 240 ft. long, 1/2 in. OD Stainless Steel Tubular reactor. The mathematical model (solved by numerical techniques on a digital computer and based on Smith-Ewart kinetics) accurately predicts the experimental conversion, except at low conversions. Hiqh soap level (1.0%) and low temperature (less than 70°C) permitted the reactor to perform without plugging, giving a uniform latex of 30% solids and up to 90% conversion, with a particle size of about 1000 K and a molecular weight of about 2 X 10 . 

---