Structures with similar analytical descriptions

A number of compounds MX have tetragonal structures in which two atoms of one kind occupy the positions (000) and ( 0) and two atoms of a second kind the positions ( Ou) and (O w). The nature of the structure depends on the values of the twD variable parameters, u and the axial ratio c a. For c a = J2 and =, the atoms in ( Ow) and (0 ) are cubic close-packed with the atoms at (000) and (H ) in tetrahedral holes. For c a = and w = i the packing of the former atoms would be body-centred cubic. The structures of PbO and LiOH are intermediate between these two extremes they are layer structures with only Pb-Pb (OH-OH) contacts between the layers (Fig. 6.21(a)). If c a = /2 and w = the structure becomes the CsCl structure, in which each kind of ion is surrounded by eight of the other kind at the vertices of a cube the structure of PH4I (Fig. 6.21(b)) approximates to the CsCl structure. Some compounds with these structures are listed in Table 6.6 they fall into groups, with the exception of InBi (c a = 0-95), with c a close to 1-25 or 0-70. 

Each of these three rhombohedral structures is described as having M at (000), X at (iH)) two Y and atoms at uuu) situated along the body-diagonal of the cell. If w = a and a = 33° 34 this corresponds to the atomic positions of Fig, 6.3(b), one-half of the Na ions having been replaced by M, the remainder by X, and the Cl ions by Y. This is the type of structure adopted by a number of complex oxides and sulphides MXO2 and MXS2 which are superstructures of the NaCl structure (group (a) in Table 6.7). However, the same analytical description applies to two 

If these structures are projected along the trigonal axis of the rhombohedron, that is, along the direction of the arrow in Fig. 6.22(a), all atoms fall on points of 

The relation between the structures of LiNi02, NaHp2, and CSICI2 (see text). In (c)-(e) the horizontal dotted lines represent layers of oxygen or halogen atoms. 

On the basis of both interatomic distances and physical properties it would seem justifiable to subdivide the compounds with structure (b) of Table 6.7 (Fig. 6.22(d)) into two classes. There are numerous oxides with this structure, sometimes called the delafossite structure after the mineral CuFe02  

---

We have discussed these structures at this point as examples of structures with similar analytical descriptions. We noted earlier that the PdS2 structure can be described as a pyrites structure which has been elongated in one direction to such... 

The interatomic potentials define the force field parameters that contribute to the lattice energy of a relaxed or energy minimized structure. The fundamental question is how reliable is a force field The force field used in evaluating a potential function must be consistent and widely applicable to all similar systems. It must be able to predict the crystal properties as measured experimentally. Two main approaches, namely empirical and semi-empirical, are usually employed in the derivation of potential parameters. Empirical derivations involve a least square fitting routine where parameters are chosen such that the results achieve the best correlation with the observed properties. The semi-empirical approach uses an approximate formulation of the quantum mechanical calculations. An example of such an approximation is the electron gas method [57] which treats the electron density at any point as a uniform electron gas. The following is the analytical description of the potential energy function and interatomic potentials we recommend for use in simulation of zeolites and related system. 

In this section a variety of analytical separations reported in the literature are reviewed to show the wide structural diversity of eluite which can be separated by RPC and to assist the reader in becoming similar with the use of this fluid chromatographic technique. The descriptions are ar-ranged according to the matrix in which an analyte is found or the area of - h istry in which the samples are generally encountered. Thus theophylline, for example, is regarded as a nucleotide and, for the most part, its analysis in food samples is found with appropriate cross references. On the other hand, the separations of pharmaceuticals found in serum, urine, and pharmaceutical samples are cited separately. It is hoped that this method of classification may serve the purposes of those wh e analytical interests are incidental to their primary research pursuits. 

An analytical structure-(hyper)polarizability relationship based on a two-state description has also been derived [49]. In this model a parameter MIX is introduced that describes the mixture between the neutral and charge-separated resonance forms of donor-acceptor substituted conjugated molecules. This parameter can be directly related to BLA and can explain solvent effects on the molecular hyperpolarizabilities. NMR studies in solution (e.g. in CDCl3) can give an estimate of the BLA and therefore allow a direct correlation with the nonlinear optical experiments. A similar model introducing a resonance parameter c that can be related to the MIX parameter was also introduced to classify nonlinear optical molecular systems [50,51]. 

The basis of all these theories is the assumption of the energetic additivity of interactions of analyte structural fragments with the mobile phase and the stationary phase, and the assumption of a single-process partitioning-type HPLC retention mechanism. These assumptions allow mathematical representation of the logarithm of retention factor as a linear function of most continuous parameters (see Chapter 2). Unfortunately, these coefficients are mainly empirical, and usually proper description of the analyte retention behavior is acceptable only if the coefficients are obtained for structurally similar components on the same column and employing the same mobile phase. 

As an analytical spectroscopic technique, EPR is similar in concept to the more widely used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [see NMR Overview of Applications in Chemical Biology]. In fact, EPR and NMR are complementary to each other. Both techniques detect magnetic moments, hut NMR determines the chemical stmctures in solution, whereas EPR describes more precisely the electronic and chemical structures of a particular region of the biological system, such as electron transfer centers, metal ions, and an intermediate state of the enzyme or substrate. It is not possible to present a full description of the theory of EPR in an article with this scope. Therefore, only sufficient information is provided here to enable the readers to understand the practical aspects of this analytical tool in enzymology. 

---