Steric interactions, effect

The same situation is observed in the series of alkyl-substituted derivatives. Electron-donating alkyl substituents induce an activating effect on the basicity and the nucleophilicity of the nitrogen lone pair that can be counterbalanced by a deactivating and decelerating effect resulting from the steric interaction of ortho substituents. This aspect of the reactivity of thiazole derivatives has been well investigated (198, 215, 446, 452-456) and is discussed in Chapter HI. 

Reductions by NaBKt are characterized by low enthalpies of activation (8-13kcal/mol) and large negative entropies of activation (—28 to —40eu). Aldehydes are substantially more reactive than ketones, as can be seen by comparison of the rate data for benzaldehyde and acetophenone. This relative reactivity is characteristic of nearly all carbonyl addition reactions. The reduced reactivity of ketones is attributed primarily to steric effects. Not only does the additional substituent increase the steric restrictions to approach of the nucleophile, but it also causes larger steric interaction in the tetrahedral product as the hybridization changes from trigonal to tetrahedral. 

The effects of fluonnation on bond strengths, reactive intermediates, and steric interactions that directly relate to chemical reactivity are summanzed in this section... 

Next, examine the Sn2 transition states as space-filling models. Are you able to identify unfavorable nonbondec (steric) interactions that are not present in the reactants If so, which Sn2 reaction is likely to be most affected b] steric interactions Least affected Rationalize you observations. Hint Compare CBr bond distances in thf Sn2 transition states. How do these change with increasec substitution at carbon What effect, if any, does this havf on crowding ... 

It would be expected that the stabilization of the adsorbed species by an extended conjugated system should increase with the number of aromatic rings in the adsorbed azahydrocarbon. However, data suitable for comparison are available only for phenanthridine, benzo-[/]quinoline, and benzo[h] quinoline. The large difference in the yields of biaryl obtained from the last two bases could be caused by steric interaction of the 7,8-benz-ring with the catalyst, which would lower the concentration of the adsorbed species relative to that with benzo[/]quinoline. The failure of phenanthridine to yield any biaryl is also noteworthy since some 5,6-dihydrophenanthridine was formed. This suggests that adsorption on the catalyst via the nitrogen atom is possible, but that steric inhibition to the combination of the activated species is involved. The same effect could be responsible for the exclusive formation of 5,5 -disubstituted 2,2 -dipyridines from 3-substi-tuted pyridines, as well as for the low yields of 3,3, 5,5 -tetramethyl-2,2 -bipyridines obtained from 3,5-lutidine and of 3,3 -dimethyl-2,2 -... 

The results were simple and clear-cut Only the two terms ofa° and Emin were involved for the a-cyclodextrin systems, and the two terms of k and Emin, for (S-cyclodextrin systems. This means that the stabilities of the inclusion complexes are mainly governed by the electronic and steric interactions in a-cyclodextrin systems and by the hydro-phobic and steric interactions in (i-cyclodextrin systems, regardless of the position of the substituents in the phenols. These observations agree well with those by Harata23), who showed that there is no appreciable difference in thermodynamic parameters between cyclodextrin complexes of m- and p-di substituted benzenes and that the contribution of the enthalpy term to the complexation is more significant in a-cyclodextrin systems than in P-cyclodextrin systems, where the inhibitory effect... 

Monosubstituted cyclohexanes are more stable with their substituent in an equatorial position, but the situation in disubstituted cyclohexanes is more complex because the steric effects of both substituents must be taken into account. All steric interactions in both possible chair conformations must be analyzed before deciding which conformation is favored. 

For oxathiane 1, lone pair selectivity is controlled by steric interactions of the gem-dimethyl group and an anomeric effect, which renders the equatorial lone pair less nucleophilic than the axial lone pair. Of the resulting ylide conformations, 25a will be strongly preferred and will react on the more open Re face, since the Si face is blocked by the gem-dimethyl group (Scheme 1.9) [3, 15]. 

Studies have established that the partition between transition states 3 and 4 depends on the nature of the diol unit bound to boron and on the steric and electronic effects of the a-sub-stituent X23. The data shown below demonstrate that the reactions of2-(l-methyl-2-propenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-l,3,2-dioxaborolane proceed with a moderate preference for transition state 3 with the C2 methyl group in an axial position. Selectivity diminishes with 2-(l-methyl-2-propenyl)-l,3,2-dioxaborolane and reverses with dimethyl (l-methyl-2-propenyl)boronale, suggesting that steric interactions (gauche interactions in the case of the tetramethyl-1,3,2-diox-aborolane) between X and the diol unit on boron are capable of destabilizing transition state 4 relative to 3. 

Energy minimization methods that exploit information about the second derivative of the potential are quite effective in the structural refinement of proteins. That is, in the process of X-ray structural determination one sometimes obtains bad steric interactions that can easily be relaxed by a small number of energy minimization cycles. The type of relaxation that can be obtained by energy minimization procedures is illustrated in Fig. 4.4. In fact, one can combine the potential U r) with the function which is usually optimized in X-ray structure determination (the R factor ) and minimize the sum of these functions (Ref. 4) by a conjugated gradient method, thus satisfying both the X-ray electron density constraints and steric constraint dictated by the molecular potential surface. 

Solvolytic experiments specifically designed to test Bartell s theory were carried out by Karabatsos et al. (1967), who were primarily interested in an assessment of the relative contributions of hyperconjugation and non-bonded interactions to secondary kinetic isotope effects. Model calculations of the (steric) isotope effect in the reaction 2- 3 were performed, as well as that in the solvolyses of acetyl chloride... 

H H non-bonded interactions are of great importance in organic compoimds, and thus it was of interest to attempt to investigate H H non-bonded potential functions via the determination of a steric isotope effect in the configurational inversion of an unsubstituted biaryl. In view of the extensive work of Harris and her co-workers in the 1,1 -binaphthyl series (see, for example, Badar et al., 1965 Cooke and Harris, 1963), and since the parent compound is one of the simplest hydrocarbons that may be obtained in enantiomeric forms, the determination of the isotope effect in the inversion of l,l -binaphthyl-2,2 -d2 (9) was... 

---