Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Steady transport coefficients

The most important of recent theoretical studies on semi-flexible polymers is probably the formulation of Yamakawa and Fuji [2,3] for the steady transport coefficients of the wormlike cylinder. This hydrodynamic model, depicted in Figure 5-2, is a smooth cylinder whose centroid obeys the statistics of wormlike chains. In the figure, r denotes the normal radius vector drawn from a contour... [Pg.145]

It is now shown that the steady-state probability density, Eq. (160), gives the Green-Kubo expression for the linear transport coefficient. Linearizing the exponents for small applied forces, Xr x, < 1, and taking the transport coefficient to be a constant, gives... [Pg.43]

Other parameters of the simulation are specified in subroutine SPECS. The quantity solcon is the solar constant, available here for tuning within observational limits of uncertainty. The quantity diffc is the heat transport coefficient, a freely tunable parameter. The quantity odhc is the depth in the ocean to which the seasonal temperature variation penetrates. In this annual average simulation, it simply controls how rapidly the temperature relaxes into a steady-state value. In the seasonal calculations carried out later in this chapter it controls the amplitude of the seasonal oscillation of temperature. The quantity hcrat is the amount by which ocean heat capacity is divided to get the much smaller effective heat capacity of the land. The quantity hcconst converts the heat exchange depth of the ocean into the appropriate units for calculations in terms of watts per square meter. The quantity secpy is the number of seconds in a year. [Pg.112]

However, before going into this problem, let us briefly extend the treatment on steady state demixing given in Section 8.2 and depicted in Figure 8-2 by including cross effects. We denote the transport coefficients by Ljj and replace the fluxes ji = Lj-Vrh by jj = Lii-Vt]j+YljLij-V>jj(iJ = A,B) in the steady state condition (Eqn. (8.8)). In contrast to Eqn. (8.10), the result is [H. Schmalzried, W. Laqua (1981) M. Martin (1991)]... [Pg.192]

Transport coefficients of components of the same redox couple usually display only very small differences, hence mo=mR=m is assumed. It must be remembered that c and m are time-dependent parameters when no steady-state electrode configuration is used. [Pg.31]

In a liquid crystal most properties are best expressed relative to a director based coordinate system. This is not a problem in a macroscopic system where the director is virtually fixed. However, it can be a problem in a small system such as a simulation cell where the director is constantly diffusing on the unit sphere. Thus a director based frame is not an inertial frame. Correction terms should therefore be added to time dependent properties. Time correlation functions with slowly decaying tails might also be affected by the director reorientation. Transport coefficient obtained from them will consequently be incorrect. When NEMD-simulation algorithms are applied, the fictitious external field exerts a torque that constantly twists the director, which could make it impossible to reach a steady state. [Pg.334]

In addition to the preceding quantities, the following transport coefficients are in common use The steady state electrical resistivity... [Pg.376]

To obtain the friction coefficient X as the transport coefficient in LRT, we would like to take a nonequilibrium steady state average of the frictional force. Thus we identify F with the phase variable B. The frictional force in our system is the force exerted by the surface on the fluid. At equilibrium, the average of this force will be zero, because there is equal likelihood of fluid particles flowing in any given direction. Thus, the first term in Eq. [210] will be zero. Under shear, the surface will exert on average a nonzero force on the fluid due to the directionality of the flow. The frictional force is given by... [Pg.369]

The film and boundary layer theories presuppose steady transport, and can therefore not be used in situations where material collects in a volume element, thus leading to a change in the concentration with time. In many mass transfer apparatus fluids come into contact with each other or with a solid material for such a short period of time that a steady state cannot be reached. When air bubbles, for example, rise in water, the water will only evaporate into the bubbles where it is contact with them. The contact time with water which surrounds the bubble is roughly the same as that required for the bubble to move one diameter further. Therefore at a certain position mass is transferred momentarily. The penetration theory was developed by Higbie in 1935 [1.31] for the scenario described here of momentary mass transfer. He showed that the mass transfer coefficient is inversely proportional to the square root of the contact (residence) time and is given by... [Pg.86]

The determination of transport coefficients by a drying experiment is achieved as follows. During constant rate drying, the temperature of the drying surface is, in a purely convective drying, the so-called wet bulb temperature. With this value, the steady-state heat flux is... [Pg.40]

The detonation state, B, lies on the Hugoniot curve as shown. Its location is determined by the reaction rate and by the transport coefficients that apply to the shock transition layer. The flow behind the shock is supersonic consequently, once a steady shock is established the boundary conditions have no influence on its behavior. The determination of the detonation state can be understood by considering the behavior of the integral curve in the specific volume-reaction coordinate plane, or phase plane. [Pg.409]

Other methods have been developed for calculating transport coefficients and time correlation functions. The viscosity of argon has been computed by determining the steady flux of momentum that arises in a system in which a... [Pg.55]

A consideration relevant for later comparison of the results of simulations to experimental data concerns the experimental accuracy. The transport coefSc-ients are notoriously difficult to measure and the steady state flux method outlined above is not very precise large values for the transport coefficients are easier to determine and reported values are often of respectable precision, but even for high values (e,g., D 10 cmVs) the accuracy is typically not better than 10-20%, while it decreases for barrier membranes (e.g., D 10 cm /s and smaller) to that of an order-of-magnitude estimate. Hence, comparison with experiments will be made taking account of these variabilities. [Pg.211]

The permeability D is an important transport coefficient that represents the normalized molar flux A(a across a polymer film of thickness t with a partial pressure driving force Ap at steady state ... [Pg.8592]

At steady state, the mass ratio of active solids to total solids in the dryer, a, is related to the transport coefficients according to... [Pg.916]

Radial diffusion gives very high rates of mass transport to the electrode snrface with a mass transport coefficient of the order of Dir. Therefore, even at rotation rates of Kf rpm, convective transport to a rotating macroelectrode is smaller than diffnsion to a 1-pm microdisk. The high flux at a microelectrode means that one does not observe a reverse wave under steady-state conditions (Figure 6.1.4.3A), because the electrolysis product leaves the diffusion layer at an enhanced rate. [Pg.168]

The multitude of transport coefficients collected can thus be divided into self-diffusion types (total or partial conductivities and mobilities obtained from equilibrium electrical measurements, ambipolar or self-diffusion data from steady state flux measurements through membranes), tracer-diffusivities, and chemical diffusivities from transient measurements. All but the last are fairly easily interrelated through definitions, the Nemst-Einstein relation, and the correlation factor. However, we need to look more closely at the chemical diffusion coefficient. We will do this next by a specific example, namely within the framework of oxygen ion and electron transport that we have restricted ourselves to at this stage. [Pg.179]


See other pages where Steady transport coefficients is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.1185]    [Pg.915]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.62]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.49 ]




SEARCH



Transport coefficient

© 2024 chempedia.info