Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spray height increase

The spray height, or entrainment, between the trays, increases... [Pg.14]

The absolute tower pressure (in psia) increased by 17 percent, and hence the volume (as well as the velocity of vapor through the valve tray caps) declined by 17 percent. The reduced vapor velocity reduced the dry tray pressure drop, thus reducing both the spray height above the tray deck and the liquid backup in the downcomers. [Pg.28]

Entrainment (Jet) Flooding Froth or spray height rises with gas velocity. As the froth or spray approaches the tray above, some of the liquid is aspirated into the tray above as entrainment. Upon a further increase in gas flow rate, massive entrainment of the froth or spray begins, causing liquid accumulation and flood on the tray above. [Pg.36]

The term incipient flood is that point in a trayed tower s operation when the spray height of liquid from the tray below begins to impinge on the tray above to the extent that entrainment reduces fractionation efficiency. Incipient flood in a packed column is that point in the column s operation at which liquid hold-up increases to an extent that reduces fractionation efficiency. [Pg.179]

When the vapor flow through a tray increases, the height of froth in the downcomer draining the tray will also increase. This does not affect the foam height on the tray deck until the downcomer fills with foam. Then a further increase in vapor flow causes a noticeable increase in the foam height of the tray deck, which then increases the spray height... [Pg.33]

GAg topical sprays induced Increased height and FW (Amg/plant) (Table 2) but, also, induced decreased total epicuticular wax (Amg/plant) and )S-diketone (% total wax) contents. [Pg.454]

Water resistance test methods include AATCC 127 (hydrostatic pressure test), AATCC 42 (impact penetration test), and AATCC 35 (rain test). In the hydrostatic pressure test, a sample is subjected to a column of increasing water pressure until leakage occurs. The impact penetration test requires water to be sprayed on the taut surface of a fabric sample from a height of two feet. The fabric is backed by a blotter of predeterrnined weight, which is reweighed after water penetration. The rain test is similar in principle to the impact penetration test. [Pg.461]

Scale Up of Process. The scale up of fluidized bed coating processes has received little attention in the literature. Current practices in the pharmaceutical industry are reviewed by Mehta (1988). The basic approach described by Mehta (1988) is to scale the airflow and liquid spray rates based on the cross-sectional area for gas flow. This seems reasonable except for the fact that in the scaling of the equipment, the height of the bed increases with increasing batch size. For this reason, a time scale factor is also required. [Pg.362]

Weir Height Taller weirs raise the liquid level on the tray in the froth and emulsion regimes. This increases interfacial area and vapor contact time, which should theoretically enhance efficiency. In the spray regime, weir height affects neither liquid level nor efficiency. In distillation systems, the improvement of tray efficiency due to taller weirs is small, often marginal. [Pg.49]

The exchange processes taking place at the atmosphere-ocean border were experimentally studied by Kiseleva (1990) and Zaitsev (1988), among others. They showed that at high wind speeds the rate of gas exchange sharply increases. This is connected with the mechanism of foam formation on wave crests as well as the intense activity of air bubbles being trapped and held beneath the water surface. The dependence of the amount of spray Q on height over the water surface can be approximated well by a linear function. For instance, at a wind speed of V = 11.1 m/s this approximation is (Kiseleva, 1990) ... [Pg.172]

Data from Tables I-V show that deposits in the open from low-volume aerial sprays range from 8 percent to 82 percent and beneath trees from 3 percent to 39 percent. The percentages vary due to drop size of the spray, meteorology, properties of the tank mix, and release height. Improved formulations, uses of low volatile tank mixes, attention to atmospheric conditions which support deposition, and improvement in sampling methods should increase accountancy. [Pg.119]

Evaporation Module. Evaporation can significantly alter the aerosol size distribution as the spray cloud descends from the aircraft release height to deposit on the ground. The net effect of evaporation, because of reductions in the drop size and thus a decrease in gravitational settling velocity, is to decrease deposition near the source and increase the downwind drift of spray drops or vapor. The FSCBG model has two options that can be used to account for the evaporation of material. [Pg.158]


See other pages where Spray height increase is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.2375]    [Pg.2375]    [Pg.2358]    [Pg.2358]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.1169]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.762]    [Pg.978]    [Pg.983]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.1281]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Spray height

© 2024 chempedia.info