Spin labels physical properties

EPR SPIN-LABELING DEMONSTRATES MEMBRANE PROPERTIES SIGNIFICANT FOR CHEMICAL REACTIONS AND PHYSICAL PROCESSES INVOLVING CAROTENOIDS... 

Subczynski, W. K., J. Widomska, and J. B. Feix. 2009. Physical properties of lipid bilayers from EPR spin labeling and their influence on chemical reactions in a membrane environment. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 46, 707-718. 

Widomska, J., M. Raguz, J. Dillon, E. R. Gaillard, and W. K. Subczynski. 2007. Physical properties of the lipid bilayer membrane made of calf lens lipids EPR spin labeling studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1768 1454-1465. 

The nitroxide (33) closely resembles cholesterol in its physical and biological properties, and has been used as a spin-labelled analogue of cholesterol to investigate cholesterol-protein interactions in human high-density lipoprotein.146 The fluorescent cholesterol analogue A-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-l,3-diazole)-22-amino-23, 24-dinorchol-5-en-3p-ol (34) has been used as a substrate for lecithin cholesterol... 

In turn, the monochromatic multipole photons are described by the scalar wavenumber k (energy), parity (type of radiation either electric or magnetic), angular momentum j 1,2,..., and projection m = —j,..., / [2,26,27]. This means that even in the simplest case of monochromatic dipole (j = 1) photons of either type, there are three independent creation or annihilation operators labeled by the index m = 0, 1. Thus, the representation of multipole photons has much physical properties in comparison with the plane waves of photons. For example, the third spin state is allowed in this case and therefore the quantum multipole radiation is specified by three different polarizations, two transversal and one longitudinal (with respect to the radial direction from the source) [27,28], In contrast to the plane waves of photons, the projection of spin is not a quantum number in the case of multipole photons. Therefore, the polarization is not a global characteristic of the multipole radiation but changes with distance from the source [22],... 

Abstract Measurements of temperature dependent ESR spectra of spin labels trapped in the polymer matrices is very effective for the evaluation of molecular mobility (molecular motion) of polymer chains. We can characterize the molecular motion of the particular sites in different region by the ESR method. It is possible to detect the mobility of polymer material at the segment or atomic level. ESR studies help to relate the features of the nanometer scale to macroscopic properties of the polymer materials. We present examples of spin labeling studies in the polymer science to help readers new to the field understand how and for what areas the method is effective. In the first part, we give a simple review of the spin labeling method and present applications in the polymer physics related to relaxation phenomena in various systems. In the second part applications to biopolymer system are introduced to help the clarification of various mechanisms of bio-membranes. 

One of the most powerful methods for investigation the structure, spatial organization and physical-chemical properties of complex and supramolecular systems on the microscopic, molecular level is EPR spectroscopy in its spin label/probe technique variant (Berliner, 1976 Buchachenko Wasserman, 1976 Likhtenstein, 1976). Usually, nitroxide radicals of different structure were used for studying of structural peculiarities of ionic liquids and the mobility of spin probes in them. We will discuss shortly the most important results obtained by different authors below. 

King ME, Stavens BW, Spector AA (1977) Diet-induced changes in plasma membrane fatty add composition affect physical properties detected with a spin-label probe. Biochemistry 16 5280- 3283... 

The simplest procedure is to take the origin of a global I-frame so that P = 0 and linear momentum conservation forces kj = —k2. At the antipodes, kd = k2 so that the common I-frame is restricted now. The particle model in this frame becomes strongly correlated. If spin quantum state for I-frame, one corresponds to the linear superposition (a /S)[CiC2]i and the other I-frame system should display the state (a P)[c, — Ci]2, namely, an orthogonal quantum state. The quantization of three axes is fixed. Spin and space are correlated in this manner. Now, the label states (a P)[c2 — cji and (a )[C C2]2 present another set of possibilities. This is because quantum states concern possibilities. All of them must be incorporated in a base state set. At this point, classical and quantum-physical descriptions differ radically. The former case handles objects that are characterized by properties, whereas the latter handle objects that are characterized by quantum states sustained by specific materiality. 

In addition to the quantum numbers n, l and m, which label its orbital, an electron is given an additional quantum number relating to an intrinsic property called spin, which is associated with an angular momentum about its own axis, and a magnetic moment. The rotation of planets about their axes is sometimes used as an analogy, but this can be misleading as spin is an essentially quantum phenomenon, which cannot be explained by classical physics. The direction of spin of an electron can take one of only two possible values, represented by the quantum number ms, which can have... 

We have seen that qubits can be accomplished by different quantum properties of a system. The basic requirement is that they must be well characterized and susceptible to manipulation by an external perturbation, so that the input states can be adequately prepared and controlled to produce the desired calculation. Besides, the physical representation of the qubit in quantum information processing must be unequivocal. This is certainly a requirement that NMR systems fulflll. In fact, a natural implementation of a qubit is an isolated spin 1/2 in a magnetic field [1]. In the operator basis, the general state of this spin can be represented by IV ) = a -l-l/2) - - j8 —1/2) (Figure 4.1). Labeling the states -l-l/2) as 0) and I-1/2) as 1), each state of the system can be represented by a single label, 0) or 11), which means one-qubit of information. 

The basic idea underlying the physical labelling approach is the modification of the chosen sites of the object in question by specific compounds, which are boimd covalently (labels) and/or non-covalently (probes), whose properties make it possible to trace the state of the surrounding biological matrix by appropriate physical methods. The following main types of compounds are used as labels and probes to monitor the dynamic parameters of proteins (1) centers with unpaired electrons (stable nitroxide radicals, radical pairs and paramagnetic complexes) exhibit electron spin resonance (ESR), (2) luminescent fluorescence and phosphorescence chromophores, and (3) Mossbauer atoms (e.g. Pe) which gives the nuclear y-resonance (NGR) spectra. 

---