Spin-density functional theory nonrelativistic

For the case of a purely electrostatic external potential, P = (F , 0), the complete proof of the relativistic HK-theorem can be repeated using just the zeroth component f (x) of the four current (in the following often denoted by the more familiar n x)), i.e. the structure of the external potential determines the minimum set of basic variables for a DFT approach. As a consequence the ground state and all observables, in this case, can be understood as unique functionals of the density n only. This does, however, not imply that the spatial components of the current vanish, but rather that j(jc) = < o[w]liWI oM) has to be interpreted as a functional of n(x). Thus for standard electronic structure problems one can choose between a four current DFT description and a formulation solely in terms of n x), although one might expect the former approach to be more useful in applications to systems with j x) 0 as soon as approximations are involved. This situation is similar to the nonrelativistic case where for a spin-polarised system not subject to an external magnetic field B both the 0 limit of spin-density functional theory as well as the original pure density functional theory can be used. While the former leads in practice to more accurate results for actual spin-polarised systems (as one additional symmetry of the system is take into account explicitly), both approaches coincide for unpolarized systems. 

Equations (4.34)-(4.37) are immediately identified as the relativistic extension of the standard form of nonrelativistic spin-density functional theory. 

After insertion of (103) Eqs.(99)-(102) are immediately identified as the direct relativistic extension of the standard two-component form of nonrelativistic spin-density functional theory. This suggests the application of nonrelativistic spin-density functionals Exc[npn with replaced by in Eq.(102), thus neglecting the relativistic contributions to the dependence of Exc[n, n ] on With this approximation Eqs.(99)-(102) represent the standard RDFT approach to magnetic systems. 

First of all, a few words on the scope of this review seem to be appropriate. For simplicity, all explicit formulae in this chapter will be given for spin-saturated systems only. Of course, the complete formalism can be extended to spin-density functional theory (SDFT) and all numerical results for spin-polarized systems given in this paper were obtained by SDFT calculations. In addition, the discussion is restricted to the nonrelativistic formalism - for its relativistic form see Chap. 3. The concept of implicit functionals has also... 

Eqs. (l)-(3), (13), and (19) define the spin-free CGWB-AIMP relativistic Hamiltonian of a molecule. It can be utilised in any standard wavefunction based or Density Functional Theory based method of nonrelativistic Quantum Chemistry. It would work with all-electron basis sets, but it is expected to be used with valence-only basis sets, which are the last ingredient of practical CGWB-AIMP calculations. The valence basis sets are obtained in atomic CGWB-AIMP calculations, via variational principle, by minimisation of the total valence energy, usually in open-shell restricted Hartree-Fock calculations. In this way, optimisation of valence basis sets is the same problem as optimisation of all-electron basis sets, it faces the same difficulties and all the experience already gathered in the latter is applicable to the former. 

Nowadays, many electronic structure codes include efficient implementations [37—41] of the Ramsey equations [42] for the calciflations of nonrelativistic spin—spin coupling constants. A vast number of publications devoted to the calculation of/-couplings can be found in the Hterature, covering different aspects such as the basis set effects [43-55], the comparison of wave function versus density functional theory (DFT) methods [56-60], or the choice of exchange-correlation functional in DFT approaches [61-68]. Excellent recent reviews of Contreras [69] andHelgaker [70] cover these particular aspects. 

We have updated the material considering the latest developments in the field over the past five years. These developments comprise both computational and more fundamental advances such as exact two-component approaches and the study of explicitly correlated two-electron wave functions in the context of the Brown-Ravenhall disease, respectively. Other topics, such as relativistic density functional theory and its relation to nonrelativistic spin-... 

Helgaker et alP presented a fully analytical implementation of spin-spin coupling constants at the DFT level. They used the standard procedure for linear response theory to evaluate second-order properties of PSO, FC and SD mechanisms. Their calculation involves all four contributions of the nonrelativistic Ramsey theory. They tested three different XC functionals -LDA (local density approximation), BLYP (Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr), " and B3LYP (hybrid BLYP). All three levels of theory represent a... 

---