Relativistic direct

The example of neon, where relativistic contributions account for as much as a0.5% of 711, shows that relativistic effects can turn out to be larger for high-order NLO properties and need to be included if aiming at high accuracy. Some efforts to implement linear and nonlinear response functions for two- and four-component methods and to account for relativity in response calculations using relativistic direct perturbation theory or the Douglas-Kroll-Hess Hamiltonian have started recently [131, 205, 206]. But presently, only few numerical investigations are available and it is unclear when it will become important to include relativistic effects for the frequency dispersion. 

One-component calculations or two-component calculations including also spin-orbit coupling effects provide a firm basis for the calculations of higher-order relativistic corrections by means of perturbation theory. Several quasi-relativistic approximations have been proposed. The most successful approaches are the Douglas-Kroll-Hess method (DKH) [1-7], the relativistic direct perturbation theory (DPT) [8-24], the zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA) [25-48], and the normalized elimination of small components methods (NESC) [49-53]. Related quasi-relativistic schemes based on the elimination of the small components (RESC) and other similar nonsingular quasi-relativistic Hamiltonians have also been proposed [54-61]. 

The transformation of the Dirac equation into two-component equations are also discussed in Chapter 11, whereas Chapter 12 deals with the relativistic direct perturbation theory. 

The expressions for the calculation of first- and second-order magnetic properties have been derived and implemented at the ZORA level [40-45] using density functional theory, and at the relativistic direct perturbation level of theory [38,39]. The fully relativistic theory of nuclear spin-spin coupling [80] and the theory of nuclear magnetic shieldings have been formulated by Pyykkd [81] and implemented at the extended Huckel level [82]. 

The second complication in relativistic direct Cl arises because we have to consider all possible determinants, from those represented entirely by A strings through products of A and B strings, to those represented entirely by B strings. The most efficient strategy may vary from one block of the Hamiltonian to the next. However, each block can be treated independently, and therefore the work can be performed in pieces that do not exceed the size of the corresponding nonrelativistic problem. 

The aim of this section is to show how the modulus-phase formulation, which is the keytone of our chapter, leads very directly to the equation of continuity and to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. These equations have formed the basic building blocks in Bohm s formulation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics [318]. We begin with the nonrelativistic case, for which the simplicity of the derivation has... 

This part of our chapter has shown that the use of the two variables, moduli and phases, leads in a direct way to the derivation of the continuity and Hamilton-Jacobi equations for both scalar and spinor wave functions. For the latter case, we show that the differential equations for each spinor component are (in the nearly nomelativistic limit) approximately decoupled. Because of this decoupling (mutual independence) it appears that the reciprocal relations between phases and moduli derived in Section III hold to a good approximation for each spinor component separately, too. For velocities and electromagnetic field strengths that ate nomrally below the relativistic scale, the Berry phase obtained from the Schrddinger equation (for scalar fields) will not be altered by consideration of the Dirac equation. 

Dirac equation one-electron relativistic quantum mechanics formulation direct integral evaluation algorithm that recomputes integrals when needed distance geometry an optimization algorithm in which some distances are held fixed... 

Free-Electron Lasers. The free-electron laser (EEL) directly converts the kinetic energy of a relativistic electron beam into light (45,46). Relativistic electron beams have velocities that approach the speed of light. The active medium is a beam of free electrons. The EEL, a specialized device having probably limited appHcations, is a novel type of laser with high tunabiHty and potentially high power and efficiency. 

In order to describe nuclear spin-spin coupling, we need to include electron and nuclear spins, which are not present in the non-relativistic Hamilton operator. A relativistic treatment, as shown in Section 8.2, gives a direct nuclear-nuclear coupling term (eq. (8.33)). 

It is clear that an ah initio calculation of the ground state of AF Cr, based on actual experimental data on the magnetic structure, would be at the moment absolutely unfeasible. That is why most calculations are performed for a vector Q = 2ir/a (1,0,0). In this case Cr has a CsCl unit cell. The local magnetic moments at different atoms are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. Such an approach is used, in particular, in papers [2, 3, 4], in which the electronic structure of Cr is calculated within the framework of spin density functional theory. Our paper [6] is devoted to the study of the influence of relativistic effects on the electronic structure of chromium. The results of calculations demonstrate that the relativistic effects completely change the structure of the Or electron spectrum, which leads to its anisotropy for the directions being identical in the non-relativistic approach. 

Figure 1. Relativistic KKR-CPA D.O.S. for Cuo.73Pto.23 as calculated by a) special directions method (continuos line) b) Zeno s method (long dashed line) c) Zeno s method but in a fet lattice with c/a l (dotted line). The site potentials are in the ASA fonn.

The result is that while there is, in DM, something that might be called an information cone centered at each site, it is not really what we usually think of as a relativistic, light cone, for wliidi we can point to interior points and definitely say they arc causally related and know for sure that points outside of each other s light cones are completely independent. In DM it is simply false to say that only those events inside the information cone of the past can influence a present event the information cone can well consist of lights cones stretching into all directions, forward and back in time. 

In an effort to better understand the differences observed upon substitution in carvone possible changes in valence electron density produced by inductive effects, and so on, were investigated [38, 52]. A particularly pertinent way to probe for this in the case of core ionizations is by examining shifts in the core electron-binding energies (CEBEs). These respond directly to increase or decrease in valence electron density at the relevant site. The CEBEs were therefore calculated for the C=0 C 1 orbital, and also the asymmetric carbon atom, using Chong s AEa s method [75-77] with a relativistic correction [78]. 

Kutzelnigg, W. (1989) Perturbation theory of relativistic corrections 1. The non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and a direct perturbation expansion. Zeitschrifi fur Physik D, 11, 15-28. 

The electron density i/ (0)p at the nucleus primarily originates from the ability of s-electrons to penetrate the nucleus. The core-shell Is and 2s electrons make by far the major contributions. Valence orbitals of p-, d-, or/-character, in contrast, have nodes at r = 0 and cannot contribute to iA(0)p except for minor relativistic contributions of p-electrons. Nevertheless, the isomer shift is found to depend on various chemical parameters, of which the oxidation state as given by the number of valence electrons in p-, or d-, or /-orbitals of the Mossbauer atom is most important. In general, the effect is explained by the contraction of inner 5-orbitals due to shielding of the nuclear potential by the electron charge in the valence shell. In addition to this indirect effect, a direct contribution to the isomer shift arises from valence 5-orbitals due to their participation in the formation of molecular orbitals (MOs). It will be shown in Chap. 5 that the latter issue plays a decisive role. In the following section, an overview of experimental observations will be presented. 

If the atom as a whole is also exposed to an external electric field Ez in the z-direction, then the total relativistic molecular many-body Hamiltonian can be written... 

To provide a mathematical description of a particle in space it is essential to specify not only its mass, but also its position (perhaps with respect to an arbitrary origin), as well as its velocity (and hence its momentum). Its mass is constant and thus independent of its position and velocity, at least in the absence of relativistic effects. It is also independent of the system of coordinates used to locate it in space. Its position and velocity, on the other hand, which have direction as well as magnitude, are vector quantities. Their descriptions depend on the choice of coordinate system. In this chapter Heaviside s notation will be followed, viz. a scalar quantity is represented by a symbol in plain italics, while a vector is printed in bold-face italic type. 

Polarization. The central cone of the synchrotron beam from a bending magnet and, in general, the beam from insertion devices is polarized in the plane of the orbit (i.e., horizontally). Due to relativistic effects the cone of the radiation characteristics is narrow even if the beam is emitted from a bending magnet (cf. [10], p. 9-13 and Sect. 2.2.2). If necessary, polarization correction should be carried out directly at the synchrotron radiation facility by means of the locally available computer programs. 

In Eq. (4.10), r = 47ra02R2/T and the second term within the brackets represents interference between direct and exchange scatterings. A corresponding relativistic treatment has been given by Moller (1931). 

Although Dirac s equation does not directly admit of a completely self-consistent single-particle interpretation, such an interpretation is physically acceptable and of practical use, provided the potential varies little over distances of the order of the Compton wavelength (h/mc) of the particle in question. It allows, for instance, first-order relativistic corrections to the spectrum of the hydrogen atom and to the core-level densities of many-electron atoms. The latter aspect is of special chemical importance. The required calculations are invariably numerical in nature and this eliminates the need to investigate central-field solutions in the same detail as for Schrodinger s equation. A brief outline suffices. 

---