Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spheres of influence

While not exhaustive, the following points for consideration will go far towards optimizing the control of safety and liability standards within the engineer s sphere of influence. [Pg.171]

The ASME Consensus was first published in 1979 and has been a standard reference ever since for boiler water treatment practice in the United States and its sphere of influence. The ASME Consensus 1994 update reflected the need to cover technical advances in boiler design and water conditioning, and also new and different types of steam generator, steam purity issues, and similar matters. [Pg.561]

High contrast imaging materials, sphere-of- influence and, 19 358 High copper alloys, 7 751 High copper-lead alloys, 14 776 High coppers... [Pg.433]

Sphere, flow across, 15 72 It Sphere-of-influence (SOI), 19 355-356, 358 Spherical bubbles, in foams, 12 7-8 Spherical fillers, phenolic resin,... [Pg.875]

It is of note that the arrival of Mark into the Du Pont sphere of influence coincided with the emergence of a midwestern bred and trained chemist, Wallace H. Carothers, as director of Du Pont s polymer research. The work associated with Mark and Carothers signaled the break from the empirical practice of polymer chemistry and the birth of the science of polymers. Carothers directed the research group which on October 27, 1938 publicly announced the synthesis of a synthetic polymer which, for the first time in history, had properties superior to natural fibers. The polymer was nylon. [Pg.130]

The rate of transfer for a homogeneous system of donors and acceptors has been shown to be linear with acceptor concentration in dilute systems.(43,44) This can be understood simply by presuming that the donor has a sphere of influence, the radius of which is equal to the Forster range R0.If an acceptor molecule lies inside this sphere, the excitation is transferred otherwise the donor deexcites by fluorescence. The probability that an acceptor will lie within the sphere of influence of an excited donor is directly proportional to the acceptor concentration, and so the transfer is linear with acceptor concentration in dilute systems. [Pg.372]

The development of new substances, new products or new applications normally takes place in iimovative systems. This means that the participants in the relevant supply chains can mostly be iimovative only in interaction with each other or not, as the case may be. Market drivers, for the one part, affect the networks of participants and, for the other part, state initiatives, whereas interest groups in society also play an ever increasing role in both spheres of influence. This raises the question about what conditions prevail in such innovation systems which allow the development of sufficient learning capabilities in order to deal appropriately with the limits of knowledge and evaluation about substance effects. [Pg.130]

Site hydrogeology can affect the sphere of influence of a GZB. A GZB well should be used to remediate only one aquifer, either confined or unconfined, and should not connect different aquifers. [Pg.682]

Analogous to the spherical filler of radius R in the Kraus model, Bhattacharya and Bhowmick [31] consider an elliptical filler represented by R(1 + e cos 0), in the polar coordinate. The swelling is completely restricted at the surface and the restriction diminishes radially outwards (Fig. 40 where, qt and q, are the tangential and the radial components of the linear expansion coefficient, q0). This restriction is experienced till the hypothetical sphere of influence of the restraining filler is existent. One can designate rapp [> R( 1 + e cos 0)] as a certain distance away from the center of the particle where the restriction is still being felt. As the distance approaches infinity, the swelling assumes normality, as in a gum compound. This distance, rapp, however, is not a fixed or well-defined point in space and in fact is variable and is conceived to extend to the outer surface of the hypothetical sphere of influence. [Pg.65]

There are a variety of ways of classifying opportunities. Opportunities may be classified depending upon their sphere of influence and modality of effect. Commercial or entrepreneurial opportunities may be classified depending upon their locus within the enterprise s value chain. Each of these is briefly discussed. [Pg.174]

Opportunities may be classified based on their primary sphere of influence ... [Pg.174]

Obviously any interaction must take place within the time that the ionizing electron takes to leave the vicinity of the molecule, and a lower limit can be set for the time during which it can interact with other electrons. This is the time it takes to pass outside of a sphere of influence. Taking an energy and size appropriate to large molecules, a 10-eV electron takes about 2.7 x 10 16 sec to move 5 A. For any given molecule a more accurate interaction time can be calculated from200... [Pg.293]

Perikinetic Coagulation. If colloidal particles are of such dimensions that they are subject to thermal motion, the transport of these particles is accomplished by this Brownian motion. Collisions occur when one particle enters the sphere of influence of another particle. The coagulation rate measuring the decrease in the concentration of particles with time, N (in numbers/ml.), of a nearly monodisperse suspension corresponds under these conditions to the rate law for a second order reaction (15) ... [Pg.110]

With platinic compounds having a co-ordination number 6, the six co-ordinated units in the complex appear to adopt some symmetrical arrangement, and to behave as if they were located at the six vertices of an imaginary regular octahedron described about the sphere of influence of the central atom. Thus, the two isomers of [Pt(NH3)2Cl4] can be represented by ... [Pg.239]

This equation acknowledges that real molecules have size. They have an exclusion volume, defined as the region around the molecule from which the centre of any other molecule is excluded. This is allowed for by the constant b, which is usually taken as equal to half the molar exclusion volume. The equation also recognizes the existence of a sphere of influence around each molecule, an interaction volume within which any other molecule will experience a force of attraction. This force is usually represented by a Lennard-Jones 6-12 potential. The derivation below follows a simpler treatment (Flowers Mendoza 1970) in which the potential is taken as a square-well function as deep as the Lennard-Jones minimum (figure 2a). Its width x is chosen to give the same volume-integral, and defines an interaction volume Vx around the molecule, which will contain the centre of any molecule in the square well. This form of molecular pair potential then appears in the Van der Waals equation as the constant a, equal to half the product of the molar interaction volume and the molar interaction energy. [Pg.13]

Does it really matter how many Jews lost their lives in the German sphere of influence during the Second World War Is it so important, after so many years, to attempt painstakingly to investigate just how they died After all, it is surely morally correct that even one victim is one too many and nobody seriously denies that many Jews died. [Pg.39]

Now, consider a gas with two different types of particles in a container. The radius of the sphere of influence for collision between the two different particles is... [Pg.172]

The Exclusion Principle endows quantum mechanical systems with a property analogous in many respects to the classical concept of impenetrability 156h This property finds expression in classical structural theory in the concept of molecular, van der Waals domains that may touch and deform one another but do not overlap in the concept of ionic spheres of influence that, while polarizable and compressible, are effectively impenetrable and in the well known, if seldom articulated, theorem that the valence strokes of classical structural theory never cross one another 78h Taken with Lewis s identification of the valence-stroke as precisely two electrons, this non-crossing theorem virtually demands (in retrospect) a wave-like character for electrons and an exclusion principle. [Pg.42]

Porter s proposal was brought before the League of Nations Opium Committee — where it was publicly fought by the British representative. The British delegate drafted an amendment to Porter s plan which called for increased quotas to account for "legitimate opium consumption" beyond the medical usage. This referred to the massive addict population in British colonies and spheres of influence (predominantly in Asia) where no... [Pg.22]

The overall effects of the 7 -8 branch make it tempting to suggest that this branch is in close proximity to the 4-5-6 branch, whereas the anomerization effects suggest that the 4 -5 -6 branch is in the sphere of influence of GlcNAc-2. [Pg.246]

The presence of GlcNAc-9 makes the subspectra of the two anomers of 14 more different than those of 6 this is especially illustrated by the relatively large differences in chemical shift for H-l of Man-4, as well as H-l of Man-4, in both anomers of 14. It seems as if the steric requirements of GlcNAc-9 push the two branches towards the sphere of influence of the anomeric center of GlcNAc-2. GlcNAc-9 itself is apparently remote from this center, as no doubling of its signals is observed. [Pg.257]


See other pages where Spheres of influence is mentioned: [Pg.851]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.357]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.181 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info