Hamiltonian spectrum

Dennison coupling produces a pattern in the spectrum that is very distinctly different from the pattern of a pure nonnal modes Hamiltonian , without coupling, such as (Al.2,7 ). Then, when we look at the classical Hamiltonian corresponding to the Darling-Deimison quantum fitting Hamiltonian, we will subject it to the mathematical tool of bifiircation analysis [M]- From this, we will infer a dramatic birth in bifiircations of new natural motions of the molecule, i.e. local modes. This will be directly coimected with the distinctive quantum spectral pattern of the polyads. Some aspects of the pattern can be accounted for by the classical bifiircation analysis while others give evidence of intrinsically non-classical effects in the quantum dynamics. 

Consider the polyad = 6 of the Hamiltonian ( Al.2.7). This polyad contains the set of levels conventionally assigned as [6, 0, ], [5, 1],. . ., [0, 6], If a Hamiltonian such as ( Al.2.7) described the spectrum, the polyad would have a pattern of levels with monotonically varymg spacing, like that shown in figure Al.2.8. 

We have alluded to the comrection between the molecular PES and the spectroscopic Hamiltonian. These are two very different representations of the molecular Hamiltonian, yet both are supposed to describe the same molecular dynamics. Furthemrore, the PES often is obtained via ab initio quairtum mechanical calculations while the spectroscopic Hamiltonian is most often obtained by an empirical fit to an experimental spectrum. Is there a direct link between these two seemingly very different ways of apprehending the molecular Hamiltonian and dynamics And if so, how consistent are these two distinct ways of viewing the molecule ... 

The interaction of the electron spin s magnetic dipole moment with the magnetic dipole moments of nearby nuclear spins provides another contribution to the state energies and the number of energy levels, between which transitions may occur. This gives rise to the hyperfme structure in the EPR spectrum. The so-called hyperfme interaction (HFI) is described by the Hamiltonian... 

It is more convenient to re-express this equation in Liouville space [8, 9 and 10], in which the density matrix becomes a vector, and the commutator with the Hamiltonian becomes the Liouville superoperator. In tliis fomuilation, the lines in the spectrum are some of the elements of the density matrix vector, and what happens to them is described by the superoperator matrix, equation (B2.4.25) becomes (B2.4.26). 

For bound state systems, eigenfunctions of the nuclear Hamiltonian can be found by diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matiix in Eq. (11). These functions are the possible nuclear states of the system, that is, the vibrational states. If these states are used as a basis set, the wave function after excitation is a superposition of these vibrational states, with expansion coefficients given by the Frank-Condon overlaps. In this picture, the dynamics in Figure 4 can be described by the time evolution of these expansion coefficients, a simple phase factor. The periodic motion in coordinate space is thus related to a discrete spectrum in energy space. 

The Hamiltonian provides a suitable analytic form that can be fitted to the adiabatic surfaces obtained from quantum chemical calculations. As a simple example we take the butatriene molecule. In its neutral ground state it is a planar molecule with D2/1 symmetry. The lowest two states of the radical cation, responsible for the first two bands in the photoelectron spectrum, are and... 

Proceeding now to the instanton treatment of the Hamiltonian (5.24) we observe that the spectrum of quasienergies differs from that of the unperturbed harmonic oscillator, f Q) = 0, only by a shift independent of n [Bas et al. 1971],... 

When the potential V Q) is symmetric or its asymmetry is smaller than the level spacing (Oq, then at low temperature (T cuo) only the lowest energy doublet is occupied, and the total energy spectrum can be truncated to that of a TLS. If V Q) is coupled to the vibrations whose frequencies are less than coq and co, it can be described by the spin-boson Hamiltonian... 

The formal structure of (5.77) suggests that the reaction coordinate Q can be combined with the bath coordinates to form a new fictitious bath , so that the Hamiltonian takes the standard form of dissipative TLS (5.55). Suppose that the original spectrum of the bath is ohmic, with friction coefficient q. Then diagonalization of the total system (Q, qj ) gives the new effective spectral density [Garg et al. 1985]... 

At the other end of the spectrum are the ab initio ( from first principles ) methods, such as the calculations already discussed for H2 in Chapter 4. I am not trying to imply that these calculations are correct in any strict sense, although we would hope that the results would bear some relation to reality. An ab initio HF calculation of the potential energy curve for a diatomic Aj will generally give incorrect dissociation products, and so cannot possibly be right in the absolute sense. The phrase ab initio simply means that we have started with a certain Hamiltonian and a set of basis functions, and then done all the intermediate calculations with full rigour and no appeal to experiment. 

The discreteness in this new theory refers to the discrete nature of all measurements. Each measurement fixes a particle s position Xn and time Both and tn are allowed to take on any value in the spectrum of continuous eigenvalues of the operators (xn)op and (tn)op. Notice also that in this discrete theory there is no Hamiltonian and no Lagrangian only Action. 

An important property of the electron Hamiltonian (Eq. (3.3)) is that for arbitrary hopping amplitudes the spectrum of the single-electrons slates is symmetric with respect to c=0 if is the electron amplitude on site n of an eigenstate with energy c, then the state with amplitudes —)"< > is also an eigenstate, with energy -c. In particular, in the uniformly dimerized stale, the gap between the empty conduction and the completely filled valence bands ranges from -A, to A(). 

The continuum model with the Hamiltonian equal to the sum of Eq. (3.10) and Eq. (3.12), describing the interaction of electrons close to the Fermi surface with the optical phonons, is called the Takayama-Lin-Liu-Maki (TLM) model [5, 6], The Hamiltonian of the continuum model retains the important symmetries of the discrete Hamiltonian Eq. (3.2). In particular, the spectrum of the single-particle states of the TLM model is a symmetric function of energy. 

We note that three spin-allowed electronic transitions should be observed in the d-d spectrum in each case. We have, thus, arrived at the same point established in Section 3.5. This time, however, we have used the so-called weak-field approach. Recall that the adjectives strong-field and weak-field refer to the magnitude of the crystal-field effect compared with the interelectron repulsion energies represented by the Coulomb term in the crystal-field Hamiltonian,... 

The simplest iron-sulfur centers, which were first discovered in ru-bredoxins, consist of one iron ion coordinated by a distorted tetrahedron of cysteinyl sulfur atoms. This environment provides a weak ligand field giving a spin equal to and 2 when the ion is Fe(III) and Fe(II), respectively. It also determines the splitting of the ground spin manifold, and consequently the characteristics of the EPR spectrum. This splitting is generally described in the framework of the spin Hamiltonian ... 

A priori, one might have expected a [3Fe-4S] center to give a particularly simple EPR spectrum. Contrary to what was suggested in Ref. (13), the electronic structure of this cluster, which possess three ferric sites, is not liable to be complicated by valence delocalization phenomena, so that the intersite interactions can be described by the Heisenberg Hamiltonian ... 

Figure 11. Quantum monodromy in the spectrum of the quadratic Hamiltonian of Eq. (38). The solid lines indicate relative equilibria. Filled circles mark the eigenvalues of the most stable isomer and those above the relevant effective potential barrier in Fig. 8. Open circles indicate interpenetrating eigenvalues of the secondary isomer. The transported unit cell moves over the hlled circle lattice, around the curved fold line connecting the two spectra.

The one-electron Hamiltonian operator h = h +v, with kinetic energy operator, generates a complete spectrum of orbitals according to the Schrodinger equation... 

The underlying physics and analysis of Mossbauer spectra have been explained in detail in Chap. 4. In that chapter, the principles of how a spectrum is parameterized in terms of spin-Hamiltonian (SH) parameters and the physical origin of these SH parameters have been clarified. Many Mossbauer studies, mainly for Fe, have been performed and there is a large body of experimental data concerning electric-and magnetic-hyperfine interactions that is accessible through the Mossbauer Effect Database. 

The reason for pursuing the reverse program is simply to condense the observed properties into some manageable format consistent with quantum theory. In favourable cases, the model Hamiltonian and wave functions can be used to reliably predict related properties which were not observed. For spectroscopic experiments, the properties that are available are the energies of many different wave functions. One is not so interested in the wave functions themselves, but in the eigenvalue spectrum of the fitted model Hamiltonian. On the other hand, diffraction experiments offer information about the density of a particular property in some coordinate space for one single wave function. In this case, the interest is not so much in the model Hamiltonian, but in the fitted wave function itself. 

This is a simplified Hamiltonian that ignores the direct interaction of any nuclear spins with the applied field, B. Because of the larger coupling, Ah to most transition metal nuclei, however, it is often necessary to use second-order perturbation theory to accurately determine the isotropic parameters g and A. Consider, for example, the ESR spectrum of vanadium(iv) in acidic aqueous solution (Figure 3.1), where the species is [V0(H20)5]2+. 

---