Specific failure moment

SAM scanning acoustic microscopy SFM specific failure moment... 

A first parameter to be studied is the applied potential difference between anode and cathode. This potential is not necessarily equal to the actual potential difference between the electrodes because ohmic drop contributions decrease the tension applied between the electrodes. Examples are anode polarisation, tension failure, IR-drop or ohmic-drop effects of the electrolyte solution and the specific electrical resistance of the fibres and yarns. This means that relatively high potential differences should be applied (a few volts) in order to obtain an optimal potential difference over the anode and cathode. Figure 11.6 shows the evolution of the measured electrical current between anode and cathode as a function of time for several applied potential differences in three electrolyte solutions. It can be seen that for applied potential differences of less than 6V, an increase in the electrical current is detected for potentials great than 6-8 V, first an increase, followed by a decrease, is observed. The increase in current at low applied potentials (<6V) is caused by the electrodeposition of Ni(II) at the fibre surface, resulting in an increase of its conductive properties therefore more electrical current can pass the cable per time unit. After approximately 15 min, it reaches a constant value at that moment, the surface is fully covered (confirmed with X-ray photo/electron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis) with Ni. Further deposition continues but no longer affects the conductive properties of the deposited layer. 

For some SMETs there are no suitable PT schemes available at the moment. The low diffusion of SMETs, their scarce motivation and thus attitude to apply proper quality control measures results in a very low participation in PT schemes. Therefore commercial PT schemes providers are not motivated to offer PT schemes designed specifically for SMETs, being the risk of failure with consequent economic losses far to high to be taken. 

The aim of the system in question is to provide information support for decision-making, once a terrorist act or industrial failure at CW destruction facility occurs. Installed at the facility control room, the computational system operates under a specific program that allows an individual user responsible for decision-making to respond to the events occurring at any moment during facility operation and to do this in prompt and correct fashion. 

Other techniques have found specific use in evaluation of mechanochem-istry. For example, chemiluminescence is observed in certain polymer reactions involving oxidation. Thus, luminescence has been proposed for following the extent of mechanochemistry. The method can be 10-100 times as sensitive as ESR. It has been observed that, in cyclic stretching and contraction, polymers begin to luminesce with the maximum corresponding to the moment of rupture. The same phenomenon appears on grinding and fatigue failure [43, 44]. 

Fire endurance models These models focus specifically on the mechanical cndmance of structures during fire, and so are generally finite element models which calculate changes in stress in response to temperature change within particular structural components of different materials, namely steels, masonries or polymer composites. They can be written in isolation or combined with either zone or field models to produce a comprehensive description of the fire scenario in terms of heat and mass flows as well as component stresses. Thus, such models can be used to predict the moment of struetural failure in a member with variable accuracy. One important specific result of such models is a temperature-time profile through the thickness of a structural component such as an I-beam for example. 

---