Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvent parameters, evaluation

Since around 1950, in studies of solvent effects for organic reactions, empirical solvent parameters have been used these parameters represent the capabilities of solvents for the solute-solvent interactions (especially Lewis acid-base interactions). Though the solute-solvent interactions should depend on the solute as well as on the solvent, the empirical solvent parameters are considered to be irrelevant to solutes in other words, the use of only these parameters enables us to evaluate the solvation energies. Strictly... [Pg.42]

Solvent effects on enzymatic reactions have been most thoroughly studied for esterification reactions. It has been observed that those reactions are favorably carried out in relatively hydrophobic solvents, while the equilibrium position is less favorable for esterification in more hydrophilic solvents. Correlations between equilibrium constants and solvent parameters have been evaluated. It was shown that the solubility of water in the solvent (Sw/0) gave better correlation with esterification equilibrium constants than log P and other simple solvent descriptors [61]. [Pg.20]

Equation (12) is the most recent of several equations used to correlate solvolysis rates. Whilst in principle the equation is a theoretical one, in practice it is highly empirical because four constants have to be evaluated for each set of data correlated. Other correlations utilize experimental data to define one or more solvent parameters, and then correlate sets of experimental data using only one or at most two adjustable parameters. [Pg.51]

Evaluation of solvent-sensitive properties requires well-defined referena i ran eis. A macroscopic parameter, dielectric constant, does not always give interpretable correlations of data. The first microscopic measure of solvent polarity, the Y-value, based on the solvolysis rate of t-butyl chloride, is particularly valuable for correlating solvolysis rates. Y-values are tedious to measure, somewhat complicated in physical basis, and characterizable for a limited number of solvents. The Z-value, based on the charge-transfer electronic transition of l-ethyl-4-carbomethoxy-pyridinium iodide , is easy to measure and had a readily understandable physical origin. However, non-polar solvent Z-values are difficult to obtain b use of low salt solubility. The Et(30)-value , is based on an intramolecular charge-transfer transition in a pyridinium phenol b ne which dissolves in almost all solvents. We have used the Er(30)-value in the studies of ANS derivatives as the measure of solvent polarity. Solvent polarity is what is measured by a particular technique and may refer to different summations of molecular properties in different cases. For this reason, only simple reference processes should be used to derive solvent parameters. [Pg.153]

Despite these shortcomings, evaluations of polymer-solvent parameters are very widely used. [Pg.344]

They were the calculation of the Hildebrand solubility parameter as a function of density using tabulated thermodynamic data for carbon dioxide and Raman spectroscopy of test solutes dissolved in supercritical carbon dioxide compared to liquid solvents to evaluate solvent-solute interactions. The results of these recent approaches indicated that while the maximum solvent power of carbon dioxide is similar to that of hexane, probably somewhat higher, there is some solvent-solute interaction not found with hexane as the solvent. The limiting solvent power of carbon dioxide is resolved by choosing the alternative of a supercritical fluid mixture as the mobile phase. The component added to the supercritical fluid to increase its solvent power and/or to alter the chromatograph column is referred to as the "modifier."... [Pg.146]

Table 1, The kinetic parameters evaluated for effect of solvent on CL system... Table 1, The kinetic parameters evaluated for effect of solvent on CL system...
For the evaluation of Gcav several formulas are available, based on the shape and size of the solute and on different parameters of the solvent surface tension, isothermal compressibility, and geometrical data of the molecules. The first three formulas here mentioned are of empirical nar ture and follow almost the same philosophy of the continuum dielectric, neglecting the discrete nature of the solvent molecules but making use of experimental bulk parameters. The last formulation, on the contrary, derives from a theory based on a discrete model of fluids (the Scaled Particle Theory, SPT), even if the final expression of Gcav depends again on bulk solvent parameters only. [Pg.6]

A second useful treatment is that of Snyder (95), in which solvents are evaluated on the basis of a polarity index calculated from the solvent interaction with three test solutes, dioxane, ethanol, and nitromethane. Figure 16(12) shows an SEC chromatogram of an asphalt for the four solvents indicated. The results show significant decrease in association at 800 A as one goes from tetraline to benzonitrile. Although tetraline has the lowest dielectric constant and benzonitrile the highest, the order is reversed for THF (E = 7.25) and chloroform (E = 4.806). On the basis of Snyder s polarity parameter/ however, the order is THF (P = 4.2) chloroform (P = 4.4), and benzonitrile (P = 4.6), which agrees with the 800 A order. [Pg.235]

In this method, one considers that the interactions of the proton transfer chain with the rest of the protein and the solvent generate friction and random forces. These processes are characterized by phenomenological parameters evaluated by generating molecular dynamics trajectories, which are also used to build the PMF. The PMF and the phenomenological parameters are then introduced into the Langevin equation to simulate the time evolution of the protonation state of the chain." A transit time can be defined and compared with the experimental data. ... [Pg.410]

More fundamental treatments of polymer solubihty go back to the lattice theory developed independentiy and almost simultaneously by Flory (13) and Huggins (14) in 1942. By imagining the solvent molecules and polymer chain segments to be distributed on a lattice, they statistically evaluated the entropy of solution. The enthalpy of solution was characterized by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, which is related to solubihty parameters by equation 5. For high molecular weight polymers in monomeric solvents, the Flory-Huggins solubihty criterion is X A 0.5. [Pg.435]

This is a difficult parameter to measure, particularly on one or two evaluation column sets. It was found that most column problems are actually caused by catastrophic instrument failure or poor filtering of the solvent or sample. [Pg.586]

Adsorption is influenced by the surface area of the adsorbent, the nature of the solvent being adsorbed, the pH of the operating system, and the temperature of operation. These are important parameters to be aware of when designing or evaluating an adsorption process. [Pg.139]

The intrinsic properties of an electrolyte evaluated at low concentrations of the salt and from the viscosity and permittivity of the solvent also determine the conductivity of concentrated solutions. Various systems were studied to check this approach. The investigated parameters and effects were ... [Pg.486]

The approach presented above is referred to as the empirical valence bond (EVB) method (Ref. 6). This approach exploits the simple physical picture of the VB model which allows for a convenient representation of the diagonal matrix elements by classical force fields and convenient incorporation of realistic solvent models in the solute Hamiltonian. A key point about the EVB method is its unique calibration using well-defined experimental information. That is, after evaluating the free-energy surface with the initial parameter a , we can use conveniently the fact that the free energy of the proton transfer reaction is given by... [Pg.58]

This stipulation of the interaction parameter to be equal to 0.5 at the theta temperature is found to hold with values of Xh and Xs equal to 0.5 - x < 2.7 x lO-s, and this value tends to decrease with increasing temperature. The values of = 308.6 K were found from the temperature dependence of the interaction parameter for gelatin B. Naturally, determination of the correct theta temperature of a chosen polymer/solvent system has a great physic-chemical importance for polymer solutions thermodynamically. It is quite well known that the second viiial coefficient can also be evaluated from osmometry and light scattering measurements which consequently exhibits temperature dependence, finally yielding the theta temperature for the system under study. However, the evaluation of second virial... [Pg.107]


See other pages where Solvent parameters, evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.133]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.87]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 ]




SEARCH



Solvent parameter

© 2024 chempedia.info