Solvent equations multiparameter

A study of the effect of solvent on the insertion reaction of (lb) with cis-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane shows that the reaction occurs faster in solvents with greater hydrogen bond donor capacity <94JCS(P2)45l>. The rates of the insertion reaction in several binary solvents (acetone plus a second solvent) were measured and treated with a multiparameter empirical solvent equation. This correlation indicated that, of the several solvent property parameters contained in the equation, solvent donor capacity was the most influential. 

Many approaches have been used to correlate solvent effects. The approach used most often is based on the electrostatic theory, the theoretical development of which has been described in detail by Amis [114]. The reaction rate is correlated with some bulk parameter of the solvent, such as the dielectric constant or its various algebraic functions. The search for empirical parameters of solvent polarity and their applications in multiparameter equations has recently been intensified, and this approach is described in the book by Reich-ardt [115] and more recently in the chapter on medium effects in Connor s text on chemical kinetics [110]. 

This result confirms that in order to have an adequate treatment of the effect of solvation on the redox potential, one should make use of multiparameter equations which take into account, on a case by case basis, the acid, basic and electrostatic character of the solvent, thus allowing evaluation of their respective contributions. 

For a complete quantitative description of the solvent effects on the properties of the distinct diastereoisomers of dendrimers 5 (G = 1) and 6 (G = 1), a multiparameter treatment was used. The reason for using such a treatment is the observation that solute/solvent interactions, responsible for the solvent influence on a given process—such as equilibria, interconversion rates, spectroscopic absorptions, etc.—are caused by a multitude of nonspecific (ion/dipole, dipole/dipole, dipole/induced dipole, instantaneous dipole/induced dipole) and specific (hydrogen bonding, electron pair donor/acceptor, and chaige transfer interactions) intermolecular forces between the solute and solvent molecules. It is then possible to develop individual empirical parameters for each of these distinct and independent interaction mechanisms and combine them into a multiparameter equation such as Eq. 2, "... 

Another possibility to predict /Qaw is to use our multiparameter LFER approach. As we introduced in Chapter 5, we may consider the intermolecular interactions between solute molecules and a solvent like water to estimate values of yiv (Eq. 5-22). Based on such a predictor of %w, we may expect a similar equation can be found to estimate Ki3LVl values, similar to that we have already applied to air-organic solvent partitioning in Section 6.3 (Table 6.2). Considering a database of over 300 compounds, a best-fit equation for Ki m values which reflects the influence of various intermolecular interactions on air-water partitioning is ... 

Generally, the rate of alkaline hydrolysis of a series of substituted phenyl benzoates was decreased in the presence of 0.5 m BiuNBr, the retardation being larger for esters with electron-donating substituents. The data from 22 esters were fitted to a multiparameter equation, the results showing that solvent electrophilicity was the main factor responsible for changes in the ortho, para and meta polar substituent effects with medium.15... 

In the early use of linear Gibbs energy relationships, simple single-term equations sueh as the Hammett equation were eonsidered suffieient to fit given sets of experimental data from reaetion series. Later on, more eomplieated multi-term equations with more than one produet term were formulated in order to model the simultaneous influence of several effects on chemical reactions or optical excitations one product term per effect [15], The connection between such multiparameter relationships and solvent effects will be described in Section 7.7. 

Another important treatment of multiple interacting solvent effects, in principle analogous to Eq. (7-50) but more precisely elaborated and more generally applicable, has been proposed by Kamlet, Abboud, and Taft (KAT) [84a, 224, 226], Theirs and Koppel and Palm s approaches have much in common, i.e. that it is necessary to consider non-specific and specific solute/solvent interactions separately, and that the latter should be subdivided into solvent Lewis-acidity interactions (HBA solute/HBD solvent) and solvent Lewis-basicity interactions (HBD solute/HBA solvent). Using the solvato-chromic solvent parameters a, and n, which have already been introduced in Section 7.4 cf. Table 7-4), the multiparameter equation (7-53) has been proposed for use in so-called linear solvation energy relationships (LSER). 

The multiparameter equation (7-54) seems to be rather difficult to apply. However, in practice, most of the linear solvation energy relationships that have been reported are simpler than indicated by Eq. (7-54) since one or more terms are inappropriate. For example, if the solute property A does not involve the creation of a cavity or a change in cavity volume between initial and activated or excited states (as is the case for solvent effects on spectral properties), the term is dropped from Eq. (7-54). If the solvent-dependent process under study has been carried out in non-HBD solvents only, the a term drops out. On the other hand, if the solutes are not hydrogen-bond donors or Lewis acids, the P term drops out of Eq. (7-54). Thus, for many solvent-dependent processes, Eq. (7-54) can be reduced to a more manageable one-, two- or three-parameter correlation equation by a judicious choice of solutes and solvents [226],... 

Dealing with this type of multiparameter correlation analysis, a series of twelve articles entitled Solubility Properties in Polymers and Biological Media was published by Kamlet, Taft, Abraham et al. (Part 1 [273]...Part 12 [274]), as well as another series entitled Solute Solvent Interactions in Chemical and Biological Systems (Part 4 [358]... Part 7 [359]). The application of the LSER equation (7-58) to the prediction of solubilities of organic nonelectrolytes in water, blood, and other body tissues has been reviewed [286],... 

Finally, a multiparameter correlation equation based solely on theoretically determined solvent descriptors, introduced by Famini and Wilson, deserves attention [350], Linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs), such as the KAT equation (7-54) and its successors, can be summarized by the general form shown in Eq. (7-66) ... 

Many different solvent parameters and multiparameter equations have been introduced in this Chapter 7. Certainly, only a few of them will survive the test of applicabihty and aeeeptanee by organic chemists. Indeed, the preference for certain time-tested solvent seales and multiparameter treatments is already clearly discernible. Amongst the one-parameter seales, the t(30) or Ej seale and the DN scale have frequently been used, while the Kamlet-Abboud-Taft (KAT) LSER approach seems to be the most widely applied multiparameter approach. 

The multiparameter treatment of solvent effeets ean be criticized from at least three complementary points of view. First, the separation of solvent effects into various additive contributions is somewhat arbitrary, since different solute/solvent interaction mechanisms can cooperate in a non-independent way. Second, the choice of the best parameter for every type of solute/solvent interaction is critical because of the complexity of the corresponding empirieal solvent parameters, and because of their susceptibility to more than one of the multiple facets of solvent polarity. Third, in order to estabhsh a multiparameter regression equation in a statistically perfect way, so many experimental data points are usually necessary that there is often no room left for the prediction of solvent effects by extrapolation or interpolation. This helps to get a sound interpretation of the observed solvent effeet for the process under study, but simultaneously it limits the value of such multiparameter equations for the chemist in its daily laboratory work. 

The seareh for empirieal parameters of solvent polarity and their applieations in multiparameter equations has reeently been intensified, thus making it neeessary to rewrite large parts of Chapter 7. 

The solvent effects on rates shown by these two reactions were determined employing the solvents chloroform, dichloromethane, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, benzene, tetrahydrofuran and dioxane. Solvents which react with TCNE, such as nitromethane, dimethylformamide and protic solvents, as well as cyclohexane, carbon tetrachloride and tetrachloroethylene, in which the reactants have very low solubility, were deliberately excluded from the study. The observed solvent effects were virtually identical for both Diels-Alder and [2 + 2] cycloaddition processes. Statistical correlations of rate data using a multiparameter equation with dependencies based on acceptor properties, polarizability and inherent polarity of the solvents gave nearly identical coefficients through the regression analyses for each term for both reactions, and excellent linear fits to the rate data. 

Koppel and Palm (27) theoretically justified the application of multiparameter correlations based on LFER in a quantitative expression of several types of interactions between the solvent and substrate. Their conclusion was that effects of the solvent on the chemical reactivity and on various physical and physicochemical phenomena are of similar nature and that there exist only several types of physical interactions between the solvent and substrate. Then it is possible to find a general approach to the evaluation of experimental data, that is, to express these interactions quantitatively. For this purpose they suggested a four-parameter equation (27) in... 

Multiparameter equations were suggested that reflect the effect of solvent on the reaction rate (102). These equations were derived assuming the validity of the LFER type relations in each solvent. On the same assumption they may be applied to a system with a heterogeneous catalyst, where moreover the effect of solvents on the relative adsorption coefficients of substrates may be described in a similar way. 

Acceptor numbers (AN) have also been reported (175) for the solvents treated previously (again using the benzene AN number for toluene), which allows a multiparameter treatment according to Gutmann s donor-acceptor approach to solvent effects. In light of the near proportionality between AN and -K for non-HBD solvents shown in Equation 115o, this is roughly equivalent to a multiple-parameter correlation with DN and ir. The correlation equation with DN and AN is... 

At first, solvent effects on reactivity were studied in terms of some particular solvent parameter. Later on, more sophisticated methods via multiparameter equations were applied such as ... 

Another problem with the interpretation of multiparameter equations such as [ 13.1.2] arises since some of the parameters used are not fully independent of one another. As to this, the trend between jf and a has already been mentioned. Similarly, the parameter displays some connection to the polarity indices. Virtually, the various parameters feature just different blends of more fundamental intermolecular forces (see below). Because of this, the interpretations of empirical solvent-reactivity correlations are often based more on intuition or preconceived opinion than on physically defined interaction mechanisms. As it... 

In the course of time, however, a rather sophisticated scheme has developed of quantitative treatments of solute-solvent interactions in the framework of LSERs. The individual parameters employed were imagined to correspond to a particular solute-solvent interaction mechanism. Unfortunately, as it turned out, the various empirical polarity scales feature just different blends of fundamental intermolecular forces. As a consequence, we note at the door to the twenty-first century, alas with melancholy, that the era of combining empirical solvent parameters in multiparameter equations, in a scientific context, is beginning to fade away. As a matter of fact, solution chemistry researeh is increasingly being occupied by theoretical physics in terms of molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, the integral equation approach, etc. 

---