Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solubility solvation, affected

Stoichiometric hydrates are the most important solvates affecting the solubility of marketed pharmaceuticals. Hemihydrates, monohydrates, and dihydrates are the most common stoichiometric ratios of water incorporated into the crystalline lattice of drugs. Pfeiffer et al. (1970) have shown how different hydrates of cephalosporins could be isolated from solvent systems of varying water activity. Cephalexin has a monohydrate and a dihydrate form, which are stable under different relative humidity conditions. Cefazolin has a monohydrate, a sesquihydrate (1.5 moles water), and a pentahydrate form (Byrn and Pfeiffer, 1992). Jozwiakowski et al. (1996) have found that lamivudine can form a 0.2 hydrate, where only one of L ve lamivudine molecules in the crystal lattice is associated with a water molecule. Multiple solvates can be formed for the same drug Stephenson et al. (1994) have shown that dithromycin can crystallize in at least nine solvate forms, including a cyclohexane trisolvate and an acetonitrile trihydrate. In addition, Byrn et al. (1995) have noted that desolvated forms of some drugs have unique properties that differ from their nonsolvated counterparts. [Pg.553]

The solubility is most often experimentally determined from the dmg concentration in the liquid phase after adding excessive amounts of a solid dmg substance to the test medium. This apparent solubility is affected by the solid-state properties of the dmg, for example, polymorphs, solvates, impurities, and amorphous content. An equilibrium with the thermodynamically most stable solid-state form, being the least... [Pg.528]

It is clear from Table 1 and Figures 2 and 3 how solvation affects the cyclic voltammetric results. The behaviour of [Cu(bddh)(NO )2] and [Cu(bddh)(Hdmpz)](BF/)2> both soluble in MeCN with no detectable decomposition, can be considered quasi-reversible, diffusion controlled (currents varied linearly with the square root of the scan rates), one-electron redox processes, involving a sequence Cu(II)-Cu(I)-Cu(II). Their half-wave potentials are practically independent of the scan rate their values, +555 mV vs. SCE (ca.+795 vs. NHE) and +525 mV vs. SCE (ca.+765 vs. NHE), respectively, are of the order of magnitude of the highest redox potentials found for the blue copper proteins [7]. [Pg.175]

The selection of the solvent can affect a reaction drastically. In the Halex process for the conversion of 2,4-dichloronitrobenzene with KF to 2,4-difluoronitrobenzene, no reaction occurs in toluene as a solvent, presumably because KF has negligible solubility in toluene. In water, in which KF is highly soluble, no reaction occurs either, due to poor solubility of 2,4-dichloronitrobenzene in water and heavy solvation of fluoride rendering it ineffective. Dimethylformamide is suitable as the solvent KF has some solubility, while the product KCl precipitates (Atherton and Jones, 1995). [Pg.179]

Solubilities, in water, ethanol, and ethanol-water mixtures, have been reported for [Fe(phen)3]-(0104)2, [Fe(phen)3]2[Fe(CN)6], and [Fe(phen)3][Fe(phen)(CN)4]. Solubilities of salts of several iron(II) iiimine complexes have been measured in a range of binary aqueous solvent mixtures in order to estimate transfer chemical potentials and thus obtain quantitative data on solvation and an overall picture of how solvation is affected by the nature of the ligand and the nature of the mixed solvent medium. Table 8 acts as an index of reports of such data published since 1986 earlier data may be tracked through the references cited below Table 8, and through the review of the overall pattern for iron(II) and iron(III) complexes (cf. Figure 1 in Section 5.4.1.7 above) published recently. ... [Pg.445]

Certain SEC applications solicit specific experimental conditions. The most common reason is the limited sample solubility. In this case, special solvents or increased temperature are inavoid-able. A possibility to improve sample solubility and quality of eluent offer multicomponent solvents (Sections 16.2.2 and 16.8.2). The selectivity of polymer separation by SEC drops with the deteriorating eluent quality due to decreasing differences in the hydrodynamic volume of macromolecules with different molar masses. The system peaks appear on the chromatograms obtained with mixed eluents due to preferential solvation of sample molecules (Sections 16.3.2 and 16.3.3). The multicomponent eluents may create system peaks also as a result of the (preferential) sorption of their components within column packing [144,145]. The extent of preferential sorption is often sensitive toward pressure variations [69,70,146-149]. Even if the specific detectors are used, which do not see the eluent composition changes, it is necessary to discriminate the bulk sample solvent from the SEC separated macromolecules otherwise the determined molecular characteristics can be affected. This is especially important if the analyzed polymer contains a tail of fractions possessing lower molar masses (Sections 16.4.4 and 16.4.5). [Pg.474]

Besides regulatory importance, salts, polymorphs, and hydrates/solvates have clear novelty and patentability considering their different chemical compositions or distinguishable solid state ( fon Raumer et al., 2006). Those new forms can affect not only their processibilities, such as crystallization,Lltration, and compression, but also their biological properties, such as solubility and bioavailability. Besides, the manufacturing processes for those forms are often innovative, and thus patentable. [Pg.85]

In this chapter, we will extend the concepts of equilibrium that have been discussed in previous chapters. In Chapter 10 we discussed the concept of equilibrium in relation to saturated solutions in which an equilibrium was established between solvated ions and undissolved solute. In Chapter 11 we discussed the solubility of different salts when we looked at the formation of precipitates. In this chapter you will see the connection between these two ideas with the introduction of the solubility product constant, Ksp, which is a quantitative means of describing solubility equilibria. This measure helps to predict and explain the precipitation of different salts from solution. You will also see how the common-ion effect, temperature, and pH affect solubility. [Pg.353]

Leahy [30], van de Waterbeemd [14] and Albery [16] discussed the meaning of the rate constants, koa, kao it is sufficient to state here that the primary process involved is the resolvation of the compound as it moves from the octanol to water environments, that is, the loss of any strongly associated octanol molecules and gain of water. Because of the mutual solubility of these solvents it seems reasonable to say that some solvent molecules may transfer along with the compound (which may not be true for other solvent systems where the mutual solubilities are lower). There may also be molecular conformation changes during this process of transfer, which would also be likely to affect solvation. [Pg.171]

Another factor affecting the nucleophilicity of these ions is their solvation, particularly in protic solvents. A protic solvent is one that has acidic protons, usually in the form of O—H or N—H groups. These groups form hydrogen bonds to negatively charged nucleophiles. Protic solvents, especially alcohols, are convenient solvents for nucleophilic substitutions because the reagents (alkyl halides, nucleophiles, etc.) tend to be quite soluble. [Pg.239]

An excellent illustration of how the stability of Cu1 relative to Cun may be affected by solvent is provided by acetonitrile. The Cu+ ion is very effectively solvated by MeCN, and the copper(I) halides have relatively high solubilities (e.g., Cul, 35 g/kg MeCN), versus negligible solubilities in H20. Copper(I) is more stable than Cu11 in MeCN and the latter is, in fact, a comparatively powerful oxidizing agent. The tetrahedral ion [Cu(MeCN)4]+ can be isolated in salts with large anions (e.g., CIO4- and PF6 ). [Pg.856]

On the basis of the biocatalyst stability results it was obvious that there were indirect effects that influenced the reaction, for example the density-dependent physical properties were affected by the change in pressure. An increase in pressure led to an enhanced solvent density with improvement in its solvating power in the reaction bulk. The solubility in the liquid reaction mixture increased with pressure as well. In the liquid subcritical region rich in CO2, at pressures below... [Pg.112]


See other pages where Solubility solvation, affected is mentioned: [Pg.501]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.1740]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.171 ]




SEARCH



Solubility, solvates

© 2024 chempedia.info