Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solubility limits, extrapolation

This method is best solved graphically by plotting the maximum concentration measured at the center of the plume on different dates, then extrapolating to determine the date on which the concentrations of the contaminant in question approaches its solubility limit. The solubility limit, corrected for the temperature of the aquifer, for a particular contaminant can be obtained from the literature. [Pg.126]

Although determination of a complete pH-degradation rate profile is desired, it may not always be practical due to limitations of drug supply and time. Also, insufficient solubility in purely aqueous systems may limit determination of pH-degradation rate profiles. Organic cosolvents may be used to increase solubility however, extrapolation to aqueous conditions must be done with caution. Stability of the drug in a suspended form in the desired buffer can be tested in lieu of solution stability. The stress test results must however, be interpreted in relation to the solubility in the suspension medium. The test may provide an empirical indication of pH stability in the presence of excess water. Satisfactory stability in the GI pH range (1 to 7.5) is important for oral absorption. While there are examples of... [Pg.24]

In Figure 4.2, the concentration-temperature diagram is shown for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in water. The solid line denotes the solnbility limit the dashed line is the solubility that is expected based on extrapolation of the behavior at low temperatures. The rate of solubility increases with temperatnre changes abruptly at about 10°C, which is known as the Krafft point. Below this temperatnre, no micelles are present and the solid surfactant, in which the hydrocarbon chains are rather rigid, is formed at the solubility limit. However, above the Krafft point, micelles whose hydrocarbon chains are much more fiexible form at con-centrahons above the dashed line, which represents the CMC. At much higher concentrahons (not shown), the solubility limit is ultimately reached and a liquid crystalline phase also having fiexible chains separates. Snch phases are discussed in Sechon 4. [Pg.168]

Mechanistically, in approximately neutral solutions, solid state diffusion is dominant. At higher or lower pH values, iron becomes increasingly soluble and the corrosion rate increases with the kinetics approaching linearity, ultimately being limited by the rate of diffusion of iron species through the pores in the oxide layer. In more concentrated solutions, e.g. pH values of less than 3 or greater than 12 (relative to 25°C) the oxide becomes detached from the metal and therefore unprotective . It may be noted that similar Arrhenius factors have been found at 75 C to those given by extrapolation of Potter and Mann s data from 300°C. [Pg.842]

Benzene solubilities of the extracts in liquid benzene at room temperature were also measured. The results, shown in Table III, show that solubility increases with inaeasing size of the added alkyl group. Interestingly, the O-butylated and O-octylated extracts showed the same solubilities in liquid benzene, suggesting that there is a limit to the amount of extract that can be rendered soluble in liquid benzene by O-alkylation. Extrapolating these results to the vapor pressure measurements, we would predict the untreated extract... [Pg.149]

This discussion has been largely limited to solubility parameter approaches that some considerto be of limited application since they have quantitative limits. It should be appreciated that these theoretical approaches and their applications have led to a deeper understanding of solubility behavior and of predictive approaches to solubility estimations. More to the point, extrapolations and interpolations dramatically extend the applicability of these approaches to the estimation, albeit a crude estimation, of the solubility of a new compound in a well-studied solvent, or of a well-characterized compound in a new solvent. In 1949, Hildebrand stated ... [Pg.18]

Only a few of the reactions summarized in Table 3.3 are actually based on data at subzero temperatures. In most cases, the lower temperature for data is 0°C. This could potentially be a serious limitation for the FREZCHEM model. For example, quantifying carbonate chemistry requires specification of Ah,co2 -ftcb - 2 and Kw all of these reactions are only quantified for temperatures > 0 °C (Table 3.3). Figure 3.9 demonstrates how six of the most important relationships of Table 3.3 extrapolate to subzero temperatures. We were able, based on these extrapolations, to quantify the solubility product of nahcolite (NaHCOa) and natron (Na2CO3 10H2O) to temperatures as low as — 22°C (251 K) (Marion 2001). Even for highly soluble bicarbonate and carbonate minerals such as nahcolite and natron, their solubilities decrease rapidly with temperature (Marion 2001). For example, for a hypothetical saline, alkaline brine that initially was 4.5 m alkalinity at 25 °C, the final alkalinity at the eutectic at —23.6°C was 0.3m (Marion 2001). At least for carbonate systems it is not necessary to extrapolate much beyond about —25 °C to quantify this chemistry, which we believe can reasonably be done using existing equation extrapolations (Fig. 3.9). [Pg.41]

The 31p chemical shifts of 0.05, 0.025 and 0.0125 M solutions in deuteriochloroform were recorded, except where solubilities were limited, and the chemical shifts at infinite dilution, 6P, obtained by extrapolation. The... [Pg.573]

Analytical representation of the excess Gibbs energy of a system impll knowledge of the standard-state fugacities ft and of the frv. -xt relationshi Since an equation expressing /, as a function of x, cannot recognize a solubili limit, it implies an extrapolation of the /i-vs.-X[ curve from the solubility I to X) = 1, at which point /, = This provides a fictitious or hypothetical va for the fugadty of pure species 1 that serves to establish a Lewis/ Randall 1 for this species, as shown by Fig. 12.21. ft is also the basis for calculation of activity coefficient of species 1 ... [Pg.215]


See other pages where Solubility limits, extrapolation is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.4777]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.12]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.60 ]




SEARCH



Extrapolation limits

Solubility limitations

Solubility limits

© 2024 chempedia.info