Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solubility equilibria limitations

Both the physical re-solution of the major gas phase and also the large mass of the fluid phase required appear to preclude resolution and effervescence as a significant mechanism to fractionation noble gases beyond the soluble equilibrium limit without very careful consideration of the geological context. [Pg.558]

Now set up a concentration table. The equilibrium constant for precipitation is very large, so imagine the precipitation in two steps (see Example ). First, take the reaction to completion by applying limiting reactant stoichiomehy. Then switch on the solubility equilibrium ... [Pg.1315]

Ion-Activity Products. As in the determination of the amount sorbed through Equation 2, the characterization of surface precipitates often utilizes measurements made solely on the aqueous solution phase. Solubility studies limited in this way run a risk of being ambiguous as to mechanism because of the lack of direct information about the solid phase (10). In respect to the aqueous solution phase, ambiguity can be minimized if equilibrium is approached both from supersaturation and from undersaturation if the equilibration time is varied... [Pg.220]

Ksp, limits the concentrations in solution so that the actual redox potential is not the value calculated, which represents the values when [Ag+] = 1 M and tn = 1 M. If we use the concentrations established by the solubility equilibrium and the Nernst equation, we can calculate the actual redox potential ... [Pg.1082]

In the preceding chapter we have been considering the equilibrium of two phases of the same substance. Some of the most important cases of equilibrium come, however, in binary systems, systems of two components, and we shall take them up in this chapter. Wo can best understand what is meant by this by some examples. The two components mean simply two substances, which may be atomic or molecular and which may mix with each other. For instance, they may be substances like sugar and wrater, one of which is soluble in the other. Then the study of phase equilibrium becomes the study of solubility, the limits of solubility, the effect of the solute on the vapor pressure, boiling point, melting point, etc., of the solvent. Or the components may be metals, like copper and zinc, for instance. Then we meet the study of alloys and the whole field of metallurgy. Of course, in metallurgy one often has to deal with alloys with more than two components—ternary alloys, for instance, with three components—but they arc considerably more complicated, and we shall not deal with them. [Pg.270]

Figure 13.5. Transport vs surface controlled dissolution. Schematic representation of concentration in solution, C, as a function of distance from the surface of the dissolving mineral. In the lower part of the figure, the change in concentration (e.g., in a batch dissolution experiment) is given as a function of time, (a) Transport controlled dissolution. The concentration immediately adjacent to the mineral reflects the solubility equilibrium. Dissolution is then limited by the rate at which dissolved dissolution products are transported (diffusion, advection) to the bulk of the solution. Faster dissolution results from increased flow velocities or increased stirring. The supply of a reactant to the surface may also control the dissolution rate, (b) Pure surface controlled dissolution results when detachment from the mineral surface via surface reactions is so slow that concentrations adjacent to the surface build up to values essentially the same as in the surrounding bulk solution. Dissolution is not affected by increased flow velocities or stirring. A situation, intermediate between (a) and (b)—a mixed transport-surface reaction controlled kinetics—may develop. Figure 13.5. Transport vs surface controlled dissolution. Schematic representation of concentration in solution, C, as a function of distance from the surface of the dissolving mineral. In the lower part of the figure, the change in concentration (e.g., in a batch dissolution experiment) is given as a function of time, (a) Transport controlled dissolution. The concentration immediately adjacent to the mineral reflects the solubility equilibrium. Dissolution is then limited by the rate at which dissolved dissolution products are transported (diffusion, advection) to the bulk of the solution. Faster dissolution results from increased flow velocities or increased stirring. The supply of a reactant to the surface may also control the dissolution rate, (b) Pure surface controlled dissolution results when detachment from the mineral surface via surface reactions is so slow that concentrations adjacent to the surface build up to values essentially the same as in the surrounding bulk solution. Dissolution is not affected by increased flow velocities or stirring. A situation, intermediate between (a) and (b)—a mixed transport-surface reaction controlled kinetics—may develop.
As discussed in detail above, the intestinal absorption of Class II drug substances may be limited by dissolution rate or solubility rate. In the latter case, when the absorption is limited by the drug equilibrium solubility, an IVIVC is not likely to be obtained. The GI tract drug concentrations in this case will be close to the saturation concentration, and since standard dissolution tests are carried out under sink conditions, they can predict only processes occurring well below the saturation concentration [85], Hence, at this point, Class II solubility rate limited drugs are probably poor candidates for BA/BE waiver. [Pg.45]

Problem Solubility equilibrium of a salt is not limited to the concentrations of the ions that deliver the pure salt solution. If, for example, a large amount of chloride ions are added to the saturated sodium chloride solution, then the equilibrium deviates in such a way that solid sodium chloride is formed and precipitates (Le Chatelier s principle of getting rid of the stress ). This way, the position of equilibrium is altered however, the product of concentrations of sodium ions and chloride ions remain constant solubility product. [Pg.167]

The oxygen concentration in the liquid hydrocarbon can be accurately controlled so that it does not exceed any predetermined value by providing adequate release valves in the compressed air line and at the bubble tower used for satnration. As long as the air pressure and hydrocarbon temperature at the saturator remain fixed, the extent of oxygen solubility is limited to a value that approaches equilibrium for the particular set of conditions. [Pg.467]

Mercaptans are acidic they are rrrore soluble in caustic than in butylene. However, ethyl mercaptan, which is usually associated with butylene produced from an FCCU, has a small equilibrium driving force for caustic extraction. Also, caustic and light hydrocarbons do not mix readily. Therefore, the first job in analyzing this type of treating problem is to decide if the process is mass-transfer limited or equilibrium limited. [Pg.419]

Although NCW provides a number of benefits over traditional chemical processes, there are limitations. Many reactions produce water as a by-product, such as the Friedel-Crafts reactions, and maybe equilibrium-limited in an NCW system due to the extreme amount of water present It may be possible to use a temperature between the solubility of the reactants and products so that the products fall out of solution as they are formed, which would help drive the reaction to completion. [Pg.296]

The solubility of Mn into ZnO can exceed the equilibrium limit ( -- 13%) and reaches up to 35% [11] as a result of the nonequilibrium PLD film growth process. [Pg.323]

To illustrate the criterion for parameter estimation, let 1, 2, and 3 represent the three components in a mixture. Components 1 and 2 are only partially miscible components 1 and 3, as well as components 2 and 3 are totally miscible. The two binary parameters for the 1-2 binary are determined from mutual-solubility data and remain fixed. Initial estimates of the four binary parameters for the two completely miscible binaries, 1-3 and 2-3, are determined from sets of binary vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data. The final values of these parameters are then obtained by fitting both sets of binary vapor-liquid equilibrium data simultaneously with the limited ternary tie-line data. [Pg.67]

If the spreading is into a limited surface area, as in a laboratory experiment, the film front rather quickly reaches the boundaries of the trough. The film pressure at this stage is low, and the now essentially uniform film more slowly increases in v to the final equilibrium value. The rate of this second-stage process is mainly determined by the rate of release of material from the source, for example a crystal, and the surface concentration F [46]. Franses and co-workers [47] found that the rate of dissolution of hexadecanol particles sprinkled at the water surface controlled the increase in surface pressure here the slight solubility of hexadecanol in the bulk plays a role. [Pg.111]

Experimental results describing limited mutual solubility are usually presented as phase diagrams in which the compositions of the phases in equilibrium with each other at a given temperature are mapped for various temperatures. As noted above, the chemical potentials are the same in the equilibrium phases, so Eqs. (8.53) and (8.54) offer a method for calculating such... [Pg.533]

The solubility of oxygen in water is influenced by several factors but, generally, most waters contain, at equilibrium, about 8mg/kg at 25°C, although supersaturation may increase this considerably. Some indication of the amount of dissolved oxygen relevant in different situations is shown, on the one hand, by the value of 0-1 mg/kg found in central heating systems and, on the other hand, by the value of 0 005 mg/kg specified by most users of large boilers as the upper limit at the economiser inlet (see Section 5.5). [Pg.838]


See other pages where Solubility equilibria limitations is mentioned: [Pg.1014]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.2316]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.767]    [Pg.833]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.1465]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.853]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.1288]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.83]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.726 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.751 ]




SEARCH



Equilibrium limit

Equilibrium solubility limit

Equilibrium solubility limit

Solubility equilibrium

Solubility limitations

Solubility limits

© 2024 chempedia.info