Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solids surface characterization

TABLE III. SURFACE TENSIONS OF LIQUIDS USED FOR SOLID SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION... [Pg.573]

Overlap between p orbitals leads to cohesive energies of typically less than 0.4 eV molec The much stronger ionic and covalent bonding have binding energies of 10 and 3 eV atom respectively. Finally, physisorption is the weakest form of absorption to a solid surface characterized by a lack of a true chemical bond (chemisorption) between substrate and adsorbate and will be discussed in Chapter 4 (see e.g., Zangwill, 1988). [Pg.18]

Polymer Adsorption. A review of the theory and measurement of polymer adsorption points out succinctly the distinquishing features of the behavior of macromolecules at solid - liquid interfaces (118). Polymer adsoiption and desorption kinetics are more complex than those of small molecules, mainly because of the lower diffusion rates of polymer chains in solution and the "rearrangement" of adsorbed chains on a solid surface, characterized by slowly formed, multi-point attachments. The latter point is one which is of special interest in protein adsoiption from aqueous solutions. In the case of proteins, initial adsoiption kinetics may be quite rapid. However, the slow rearrangement step may be much more important in terms of the function of the adsorbed layer in natural processes, such as thrombogenesis or biocorrosion / biofouling caused by cell adhesion. [Pg.17]

In gas-phase reactions catalyzed by a solid surface, characterization of the chemisorbed species that are principally covering the surface can nowadays be made relatively easily by means of techniques such as IR and Raman spectroscopy, EELS, radioisotope labeling of reagents, and in some cases by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), electron spin resonance (ESR), and ESCA spectroscopies. In many cases, thermal desorption spectroscopy can be usefully applied to deduce indirectly the nature of species, and their distribution of energies of adsorption, that may have been strongly chemisorbed on the catalyst originally. [Pg.13]

The above picture of water/oxide interface does not obviously show the simultaneous, primary and secondary adsorption on non-dissociated water molecules. In their review, Etzler and Drost-Hausen wrote [89] Furthermore, as mentioned elsewhere in this paper (and other papers by the present author and associates), it is obvious that vicinal water is essentially unaffected by electrical double layers . Several properties of the vicinal water appear to be similar for various solid surfaces characterized by various point of zero charge (PZC) values (the paradoxical effect ). It is therefore to be expected that the contribution to the changes of the heat of immersion with changing pH, produced by the secondarily adsorbed vicinal water, is negligible. [Pg.374]

The final technique addressed in this chapter is the measurement of the surface work function, the energy required to remove an electron from a solid. This is one of the oldest surface characterization methods, and certainly the oldest carried out in vacuo since it was first measured by Millikan using the photoelectric effect [4]. The observation of this effect led to the proposal of the Einstein equation ... [Pg.1869]

Catalysis in a single fluid phase (liquid, gas or supercritical fluid) is called homogeneous catalysis because the phase in which it occurs is relatively unifonn or homogeneous. The catalyst may be molecular or ionic. Catalysis at an interface (usually a solid surface) is called heterogeneous catalysis, an implication of this tenn is that more than one phase is present in the reactor, and the reactants are usually concentrated in a fluid phase in contact with the catalyst, e.g., a gas in contact with a solid. Most catalysts used in the largest teclmological processes are solids. The tenn catalytic site (or active site) describes the groups on the surface to which reactants bond for catalysis to occur the identities of the catalytic sites are often unknown because most solid surfaces are nonunifonn in stmcture and composition and difficult to characterize well, and the active sites often constitute a small minority of the surface sites. [Pg.2697]

Volume 39 Characterization of Porous Solids. Proceedings of the lUPAC Symposium (COPS I), Bad Soden a. Ts., April 26-29,1987 edited by K.K. Unger, J. Rouquerol, K.S.W. Sing and H. Krai Volume 40 Physics of Solid Surfaces 1987. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Surface Physics, Bechyne Castle, September 7-11,1987 edited by J. Koukal... [Pg.263]

SALI is a reladvely new surface technique that delivers a quantitative and sensitive measure of the chemical composition of solid surfaces. Its major advantage, compared to its parent technique SIMS, is that quantitative elemental and molecular informadon can be obtained. SPI offers exciting possibilities for the analytical characterization of the surfaces of polymers and biomaterials in which chemical differ-endation could be based solely on the characteristic SALE spectra. [Pg.568]

In the following we review very briefly applications of VASP to alloys and inter-metallic compounds illustrating the potential in making ab-initio predictions of materials properties, in characterizing solid surfaces, and in studying the structure and properties of complex melts. For a more extensive list of applications, see Refs. [10, 17]. [Pg.76]

Recent Uses of Solid-Surface Luminescence Analysis in Environmental Analysis. Vo-Dinh and coworkers have shown very effectively how solid-surface luminescence techniques can be used for environmentally important samples (17-22). RTF has been used for the screening of ambient air particulate samples (17,18). In addition, RTF has been employed in conjunction with a ranking index to characterize polynuclear aromatic pollutants in environmental samples (19). A unique application of RTF reported recently is a personal dosimeter badge based on molecular diffusion and direct detection by RTF of polynuclear aromatic pollutants (20). The dosimeter is a pen-size device that does not require sample extraction prior to analysis. [Pg.157]

The importance of surface characterization in molecular architecture chemistry and engineering is obvious. Solid surfaces are becoming essential building blocks for constructing molecular architectures, as demonstrated in self-assembled monolayer formation [6] and alternate layer-by-layer adsorption [7]. Surface-induced structuring of liqnids is also well-known [8,9], which has implications for micro- and nano-technologies (i.e., liqnid crystal displays and micromachines). The virtue of the force measurement has been demonstrated, for example, in our report on novel molecular architectures (alcohol clusters) at solid-liquid interfaces [10]. [Pg.1]

Surface forces measurement is a unique tool for surface characterization. It can directly monitor the distance (D) dependence of surface properties, which is difficult to obtain by other techniques. One of the simplest examples is the case of the electric double-layer force. The repulsion observed between charged surfaces describes the counterion distribution in the vicinity of surfaces and is known as the electric double-layer force (repulsion). In a similar manner, we should be able to study various, more complex surface phenomena and obtain new insight into them. Indeed, based on observation by surface forces measurement and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, we have found the formation of a novel molecular architecture, an alcohol macrocluster, at the solid-liquid interface. [Pg.3]

The nanometer level of characterization is necessary for nanochemistry. We have learned from the history of once-new disciplines such as polymer science that progress in synthesis (production method) and in physical and chemical characterization methods are essential to establish a new chemistry. They should be made simultaneously by exchanging developments in the two areas. Surface forces measurement is certainly unique and powerful and will make a great contribution to nanochemistry, especially as a technique for the characterization of solid-liquid interfaces, though its potential has not yet been fully exploited. Another important application of measurement in nanochemistry should be the characterization of liquids confined in a nanometer-level gap between two solid surfaces, for which this review cites only Refs. 42-43. [Pg.15]

Attractive or repulsive interaction between two solid surfaces should play an important role in the interfacial frictional behavior [87,92-95]. From previous theoretical [89] and experimental investigations [87, 95], it was known that the attractive interaction result in a high friction and repulsive interaction results in low friction force. To characterize the interfacial molecular structure between two solids under electrostatic interaction is also important to elucidate the frictional properties of two solids. [Pg.89]

The latter report demonstrated the unique ability of this technique to resolve surface structure as well as surface composition at the electrified solid-liquid interfaces. In particular, STM has become an important tool for ex situ and in situ characterization of surfaces at the atomic level, in spite its significant limitations regarding surface composition characterization for bimetallic systems, such as the lack of contrast for different elements and the scanned surface area being too small to be representative for the entire surface. To avoid these limitations, STM has been mostly used as a complementary tool in surface characterization. [Pg.249]

Wakabayashi, F. and Domen, K. (1997) A new method for characterizing solid surface acidity - an infrared spectroscopic method using probe molecules such as N2 and rare gases. Catalysis Surveys from Japan 1 181. [Pg.136]


See other pages where Solids surface characterization is mentioned: [Pg.662]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.1780]    [Pg.1794]    [Pg.2804]    [Pg.1880]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.170]   


SEARCH



Characterization of solid surfaces

Computer-aided characterization of solids and surfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info