Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solid-state structures covalent network crystals

The differences in ionic and covalent bonding result in markedly different properties for ionic and covalent compounds. Because covalent molecules are distinct units, they have less tendency to form an extended structure in the solid state. Ionic compounds, with ions joined by electrostatic attraction, do not have definable units but form a crystal lattice composed of enormous numbers of positive and negative ions in an extended three-dimensional network. The effects of this basic structural difference are summarized in this section. [Pg.95]

Since the change of the bond order usually implies the change of the coordination number, it is useful to consider from this viewpoint the transformation of a molecular structure into a continuous network of covalently bonded atoms in the solid state. Thermodynamically, the depth of the structural rearrangements during gas crystal transition is characterized by the heat of sublimation AHs (see Chap. 9) from which it is natural to calculate the crystal-state ENs (x ) [377]... [Pg.101]

Chemical bonding is different in metals than it is in ionic, molecular, or covalent-network compounds. This difference is reflected in the unique properties of metals. They are excellent electrical conductors in the solid state—much better conductors than even molten ionio oompounds. This property is due to the highly mobile valence electrons of the atoms that make up a metal. Such mobility is not possible in molecular compounds, in which valence electrons are localized in electron-pair bonds between neutral atoms. Nor is it possible in solid ionic compounds, in whioh electrons are bound to individual ions that are held in place in crystal structures. [Pg.185]

Lack of steady flow of a liquid-bearing colloidal solution requires the existence of a space-filling, three-dimensional structure. As we might select a perfect crystal as a csuionical solid, or liquid argon as a prototypical liquid, we csui choose the covalently crosslinked network, without any entanglements, to represent the ideal gel state. Then an appropriate time scale for reversible gels would be the lifetime of a typical crosslink bond if subjected to conditions that would cause flow in a pure... [Pg.4]

Since the Braggs first determination, thousands of structures, most of them far more complicated than that of sodium chloride, have been determined by x-ray diffraction. For covalently bonded low molecular weight species (such as benzene, iodine, or stannic chloride), it is often of interest to see just how the discrete molecules are packed together in the crystalline state, but the crystal structures affect the chemistry of such substances only to a minor degree. However, for most predominantly ionic compounds, for metals, and for a large number of substances in which atoms are covalently bound into chains, sheets, or three dimensional networks, their chemistry is very largely determined by the structure of the solid. [Pg.174]


See other pages where Solid-state structures covalent network crystals is mentioned: [Pg.34]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.437]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.159 , Pg.160 , Pg.160 , Pg.189 ]




SEARCH



Covalent network

Covalent solids

Covalent state

Crystal covalency

Network covalent solid

Network solids

Network structure

Solid state structures

Solids crystal structure

Solids crystallization

Structural networks

Structure states

© 2024 chempedia.info