Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Soils, buried formation

In the above cell, HCl is in two different concentrations. The activity (molality x activity coefficient) ai is greater than activity 02 fli > <12-Several types of concentration cells are encountered in corrosion. For example, a concentration cell is formed if one end of a pipe is exposed to soil and the other end to air. The end of the pipe in air is exposed to a high concentration of oxygen than the end of the pipe in the soil. The formation of a concentration cell leads to differential aeration corrosion in buried structures in the soil. [Pg.23]

The data for the average decrease in metal thickness in 4 years and the linear corrosion rate are given in Table 4-2. In addition, extrapolations of the rate for 50 and 100 years are given, which are of interest for the corrosion likelihood of objects buried in earth. It can be seen from the results that film formation occurs in class I soil. In class II soils, the corrosion rate decreases with time only slightly. In class III soils, the decrease with time is still fairly insignificant. [Pg.145]

The danger of corrosion on buried installations in industrial plants is increased by various soils and by cell formation with cathodes of steel in concrete. The rest potentials of these foreign cathodes are between = -0.2 and -0.5 V [4-6]. [Pg.310]

With buried pipelines, the degree of corrosion danger from cell formation and the effectiveness of cathodic protection can be determined by pipe/soil potential measurements along the pipeline (see Sections 3.6.2 and 3.7). This is not possible with well casings since the only point available for a measuring point is at the well head. Therefore, other methods are required to identify any corrosion risk or the effectiveness of corrosion protection. [Pg.418]

Dried Puddles Concentrate Molecules In our common experience, we have all observed the formation of puddles after a rain. We realize, without much analysis, that the puddle is not formed from rain that fell in only that location. It contains water that fell nearby and flowed to that area, which is at the locally lowest elevation. If the rain falls on an area that has buried sources of explosive molecules, then some of those that were sorbed to the surface particles above the source will be dissolved and carried into the puddle. When puddles dry they leave a concentration of molecules on the surface soil particles. Thus, an irregularly shaped area of relatively high concentration of molecules may appear some distance from any buried source. See the discussion on Figure 8.2 p 182. [Pg.89]

If the expl is buried deeper in the earth than its radius of rupture, there is then formed a roughly circular depression, known as camouflet, considerably greater in vol than the expl chge producing it. Soft, low-density soil is lifted, scoured, and blown away more easily than firm or rocky earth formation. An expln in soft, swampy ground produces a relativ ely huge crater... [Pg.336]

Several factors can influence the breakdown of a cadaver and the formation of a CDI. These include temperature, moisture, soil type, associated materials, decomposer adaptation, and trauma. Furthermore, these factors may be more or less influential depending on whether a cadaver has been placed on the soil surface (exposed) or buried in soil. The effect of these factors on both the decomposition of exposed and buried cadavers will be discussed (see Hopkins, this volume). [Pg.38]

Plastic coverings are often used to wrap the body before burial, both within a coffin or when placed directly in the soil. The use of plastic to cover bodies also greatly retards decomposition however, its affect on adipocere formation is variable. Some cases report extensive adipocere formation in bodies wrapped only in plastic (Manhein 1997), whereas experimental studies show that tissue wrapped in plastic and buried in soil will result in a semifluid mass of putrefied tissue but no adipocere formation unless clothing is also present (Forbes et al. 2005b). [Pg.212]

Sulfur mustard can be very persistent in soil (Rosenblatt et al., 1995). Persistence depends on the soil type, pH, moisture content, and whether the agent is at the soil surface or buried. Small (1984) reported that when HD was applied to the soil surface, volatilization would be the main route of HD loss (half-life about 30 min), but if the soil was wet, hydrolysis would be the main loss pathway. When sprayed onto soil, a vesicant action was still apparent after about 2 weeks when the agent leaked into the soil, however, a vesicant action was still present after 3 years (DA, 1974). Rosenblatt et al. (1995) state that the persistence of sulfur mustard in soil is due to the formation of oligomeric degradation products that coat the surface of the mustard agent and that are resistant to hydrolysis. [Pg.260]

Despite the current popularity of the polyphenol theory, a completely satisfactory scheme for the occurrence of humic and fulvic acids in diverse geologic environments has yet to be established. In practice, all pathways may be operative, but not to the same extent in all environments or in the same order of importance. A lignin pathway may-predominate in wet sediments, such as peats and swamps. The drastic conditions existing in soils under a harsh continental climate (e.g., some Mollisols) may favor humus synthesis by sugar-amine condensation. The disappearance of amino acids from buried sediments has been attributed to the formation of brown nitrogenous polyelectrolytes by reaction with reducing sugars (Stevenson, 1974). [Pg.21]

Illite clays may result from the weathering of micas and feldspars. Their formation in soils and sediments is favored by high K" " and moderate silica concentrations. When smectites or mixed-layer smectite/illite clays are buried in deep sedimentary basins, they are gradually transformed into more stable illites by a combination of time and temperature (diagenesis) (cf. Velde and Vasseur 1992 Huang et al. 1993 Cuadros and Linares 1996). The reaction involved might be... [Pg.319]

Typical applications of GPR surveys include, mapping depth to bedrock, and mapping interfaces including changes in soil type, geologic formations, and depth to water table. Buried objects and excavations may also be located and in some cases identified, as well as buried cultural features including pipes, cables, and conduits (13). [Pg.128]


See other pages where Soils, buried formation is mentioned: [Pg.211]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.2496]    [Pg.1072]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.2477]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.8]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 ]




SEARCH



Buried

Burying

Soil formation

Soils soil formation

© 2024 chempedia.info