Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Small signal model

For a BJT, the Bias Point Detail gives the collector current, the collector-emitter voltage, and some small-signal parameters for the BJT at the bias point. For a jFET, the Bias Point Detail gives the drain current, the drain-source voltage, and some small-signal model parameters at the bias point. The results of the Bias Point Detail are contained in the output file. We will illustrate the Bias Point Detail analysis with the circuit below ... [Pg.187]

The complete large signal and small signal static model is provided by Equations 6.2, 6.3, and 6.1. For dynamic modeling, a simple small signal model... [Pg.95]

Fig. 6.16. A simple small signal model for OFET devices, (a) shows the model of the core device, (b) shows the device with contact resistance characterized and included in the model. Fig. 6.16. A simple small signal model for OFET devices, (a) shows the model of the core device, (b) shows the device with contact resistance characterized and included in the model.
Based on a small-signal model of the triode, it can be shown analytically that the voltage gain of the amplifier configurations shown in Fig. 5.13 is... [Pg.364]

Figure 7.132 depicts a small signal model of a CFB together with external feedback resistors Rp and Ri and an input voltage signal Vi. As is the case for the conventional op-amp, inverting and noninverting... [Pg.662]

This is valid under relatively small signal excitation conditions, and describes the motion of domain walls in local random fields, a describes the irreversibility of the domain wall motion. Under the conditions where the Rayleigh model holds, the hysteresis in the piezoelectric... [Pg.46]

In view of the general validity of eq. (3.51), for any small signal system perturbation experiment (irrespective of the excitation technique applied), the possibility to discriminate between the different variants A, B, or C of the polarization model, and therefore the interpretability of the system response in terms of Ret, R t, and 4tep/VAd critically depends upon the properties of G(s) and H(s) as extensively discussed in the literature [3.100]. [Pg.109]

Figure 22.12 shows the controller output and the valve travel calculated by both methods when the valve small-signal time constant was chosen as 3 seconds. Each model predicts a flat-topped response for valve travel, and the two predictions are indistinguishable from eachother on the scale of the graph, which is in... [Pg.294]

Figure 22.13 Simulated valve travel backlash versus velocity deadband models. Valve small-signal time constant = 25 seconds. Figure 22.13 Simulated valve travel backlash versus velocity deadband models. Valve small-signal time constant = 25 seconds.
A valve may usually be modelled as an exponential lag, subject to rate limits. For small-signal, linear analysis, the rate limits will not be breached, so the model is simply ... [Pg.303]

Modeling and device characterization is explained in chapter 6. The legacy strategy usually encountered in the literature, the IEEE standard method, and several emerging strategies for device characterization are presented. This section also discusses a number of non-ideal effects and builds a small signal device model which can be used for characterization and modeling purposes. Chapter 7 summarizes several application areas in which OFETs have been applied and shows the structure of the circuits used in many of these applications. [Pg.5]

The porous electrode theory was developed by several authors for dc conditions [185-188], bnt the theory is usually applied in the ac regime [92,100,101,189-199], where mainly small signal frequency-resolved techniques are used, the best example of which are ac theory and impedance spectra representation, introdnced in the previons section. The porous theory was first described by de Levi [92], who assumed that the interfacial impedance is independent of the distance within the pores to obtain an analytical solution. Becanse the dc potential decreases as a fnnction of depth, this corresponds to the assnmption that the faradaic impedance is independent of potential or that the porons model may only be applied in the absence of dc cnrrent. In snch a context, the effect of the transport and reaction phenomena and the capacitance effects on the pores of nanostructured electrodes are equally important, i.e., the effects associated with the capacitance of the ionic donble layer at the electrode/electrolyte-solntion interface. For instance, with regard to energy storage devices, the desirable specifications for energy density and power density, etc., are related to capacitance effects. It is a known fact that energy density decreases as the power density increases. This is true for EDLC or supercapacitors as well as for secondary batteries and fnel cells, particnlarly due to the distributed nature of the pores... [Pg.127]


See other pages where Small signal model is mentioned: [Pg.298]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.870]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.95 ]




SEARCH



Signal model

© 2024 chempedia.info