Size methods sieves

Particle Size. Wet sieve analyses are commonly used in the 20 )J.m (using microsieves) to 150 )J.m size range. Sizes in the 1—10 )J.m range are analyzed by light-transmission Hquid-phase sedimentation, laser beam diffraction, or potentiometric variation methods. Electron microscopy is the only rehable procedure for characterizing submicrometer particles. Scanning electron microscopy is useful for characterizing particle shape, and the relation of particle shape to slurry stabiUty. 

A typical testing procedure involves several steps. First, the selected number and size of sieves are stacked upon one another, with the largest openings (inversely related to mesh per inch) being at the top of the stack, and beneath that a pan to collect the particles finer than the smallest sieve. The known amount of powder to be analyzed is then placed on the top sieve and the set is vibrated in a mechanical device for a predetermined time period. The results are obtained by weighing the amount of material retained on each sieve and on the collecting pan. The suction method uses one sieve at a time and examines the amount retained on the screen. In both methods the data are expressed as frequency or cumulative frequency plots, respectively. 

The sizing methods involve both classical and modem instrumentations, based on a broad spectrum of physical principles. The typical measuring systems may be classified according to their operation mechanisms, which include mechanical (sieving), optical and electronic (microscopy, laser Doppler phase shift, Fraunhofer diffraction, transmission electron miscroscopy [TEM], and scanning electron microscopy [SEM]), dynamic (sedimentation), and physical and chemical (gas adsorption) principles. The methods to be introduced later are briefly summarized in Table 1.2. A more complete list of particle sizing methods is given by Svarovsky (1990). 

Note that the hydrometer method of particle-size determination is useful for sizes usually below 200 U. S.-sieve sizes. Above this range the material may be sized by sieves, although certainty should be made that agglomerations do not exist. 

Sieves sieving and other sizing methods. In Draft of Standard Determination of Particle Size Distribution, Laser Diffraction Methods International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Berlin, Germany. 

The bed material is sand, which is mixed with char produced by the pyrolysis of wood. Three methods were used for size analysis sieving, microscopic examination and laser diffraction. All the methods gave similar values for the panicle diameters of sand and char, though microscopic examination showed that many char particles had a needle form and therefore one significantly longer dimension that could not be captured by the other two methods. The different particles are illustrated in Figure 2 and the initial size distributions for sand and char in Figures 3 and 4. 

Sieving Methods Sieving is probably the most frequently used and abused method of analysis because the equipment, analytical procedure, and basic concepts are deceptively simple. In sieving, the particles are presented to equal-size apertures that constitute a series of go-no go gauges. Sieve analysis implies three major difficulties ( ) with woven-wire sieves, the weaving process produces three-dimensional apertures with considerable tolerances, particularly for fine-woven mesh (2) the mesh is easily damaged in use (3) the particles must be efficiently presented to the sieve apertures to prevent blinding. 

This is where the synthesis of nano-sized molecular sieves is carried out in the template matrix within confined spaces. This is an ideal synthetic route if the space size and uniformity favor the crystallization, and the as-synthesized product is easily isolated from the templates. Mesoporous molecular sieves with uniform mesopore structures can be adopted as the template, such as MCM-41. In 2000, Schmidt et al.[127] first proposed such a route to synthesize ZSM-5 nanocrystals. The synthesis procedure consisted of the impregnation of mesoporous carbon black with reaction solution, followed by treatment with steam at 150 °C, and the combustion of carbon black. Compared with other methods, the advantage of this one is that the nano-sized product is easily isolated and the yield is relatively higher. However, it also has some drawbacks. First, there is a high requirement for the preparation of carbon black as the template matrix, i.e., the mesopore sizes in carbon black must be uniform. Second, the crystallization must be performed in the mesopores, not on the extra surfaces of the carbon black. Third, a large amount of carbon black will be consumed (about four-times that of the nanozeolite product). All of these factors affect the further development of this route to some degree. 

The most difficult part of particle size estimation is related to the determination methods themselves. Particle size determination is complicated by size distribution, the presence of particle associations, and the shape of particles. If particles are not spherical, more than one parameter is needed to describe them and if the shape of the particle is irregular, numerous parameters are needed to express their dimensions. The method used for particle size determination (sieving, light scattering, microscopy, etc.) determines what dimensional aspects are measured. In addi-... 

The specific, particle sizing method chosen depends on the type of. size information needed and the chemical and physical properties of the sample. In addition to the three techniques discussed here, molecular sieving, electrical conductance, microscopy, capillary hydrodynamic chromatography, light obscuration counting, field-flow fractionation, Doppler anemometry, and ultrasonic spectrometry-are commonly applied. Huch of the particle sizing methods has its advantages and drawbacks for particular samples and analyses. 

CEN EN 933-1.2012. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates - Part 1 Determination of particle size distribution - Sieving method. Brussels CEN. 

In a size analysis by screening, material is successively passed over a series of sieves having progressively smaller openings. Particles are passed or retained on a particular aperture size of sieve surface. The object of the experiment is to determine the size distribution of coarse-sized dolomite and compare the results with those of the microscopy counting method. 

The ISO working group ISO/TC 24 Sieves, Sieving, and Other Sizing Methods is engaged in elaborating methods for the surface characterization of dispersed materials and just issued an ISO standard on the BET method. 

---