Size analysis impactor

For determination of the aerodynamic diameters of particles, the most commonly apphcable methods for particle-size analysis are those based on inertia aerosol centrifuges, cyclones, and inertial impactors (Lundgren et al.. Aerosol Measurement, University of Florida, Gainesville, 1979 and Liu, Fine Paiiicles—Aerosol Generation, Measurement, Sampling, and Analysis, Academic, New York, 1976). Impactors are the most commonly used. Nevertheless, impactor measurements are subject to numerous errors [Rao and Whitby, Am. Ind. Hyg. A.s.soc.]., 38, 174 (1977) Marple and WiUeke, "Inertial Impactors, in Lundgren et al.. Aerosol Measurement and Fuchs, "Aerosol Impactors, in Shaw, Fundamentals of Aerosol Sci-... 

Particle Size Analysis Many particle-size-analysis methods suitable for dry-dust measurement are unsuitable for liquids because of coalescence and drainage after collection. Measurement of particle sizes in the flowing aerosol stream by using a cascade impactor is one... 

Fnrthermore, for dosage consistency, there is a need for an aerosol formulation to be monodispersed [4]. The particle size distribution of an aerosol is defined by its geometric standard deviation (GSD). The GSD is the ratio of particle diameters at 84% and 50% cnmnlative mass of particles or the ratio of the particle diameters at 50% and 16% cnmnlative mass of particles when the cumulative mass of particles is plotted against the eqnivalent diameter on a log-probability scale following particle size analysis nsing either impactors or laser diffraction instruments. 

Mitchell JP, Nagel MW, Wiersema KJ, et al. Aerodynamic particle size analysis of aerosols from pressurized metered-dose inhalers comparison of Andersen 8-stage cascade impactor, next generation pharmaceutical impactor, and model 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer aerosol spectrometer. AAPS PharmSciTech 2003 4 E54. 

Inertial impaction is the method of choice for evaluating particle or droplet size delivery from pharmaceutical aerosol systems. This method lends itself readily to theoretical analysis, ft has been evaluated in general terms [39] and for specific impactors [40]. Inertial impaction employs Stokes law to determine aerodynamic diameter of particles being evaluated. This has the advantage of incorporating shape and density effects into a single term. 

The shift of Pb-214 to a slightly higher size distribution compared to Pb-212 was also found using 1-ACFM and HVI impactors (Fig. 2). The higher flow rates of these impactors, as well as the ability to measure HVI activity by gamma spectroscopy, made us confident that this shift was real and not a data analysis artifact. 

Improved control devices now frequently installed on conventional coal-utility boilers drastically affect the quantity, chemical composition, and physical characteristics of fine-particles emitted to the atmosphere from these sources. We recently sampled fly-ash aerosols upstream and downstream from a modern lime-slurry, spray-tower system installed on a 430-Mw(e) coal utility boiler. Particulate samples were collected in situ on membrane filters and in University of Washington MKIII and MKV cascade impactors. The MKV impactor, operated at reduced pressure and with a cyclone preseparator, provided 13 discrete particle-size fractions with median diameters ranging from 0,07 to 20 pm with up to 6 of the fractions in the highly respirable submicron particle range. The concentrations of up to 35 elements and estimates of the size distributions of particles in each of the fly-ash fractions were determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis and by electron microscopy, respectively. Mechanisms of fine-particle formation and chemical enrichment in the flue-gas desulfurization system are discussed. 

We have operated the University of Washington MKV impactor as a low-pressure impactor to provide for chemical analysis, four discretely sized fly-ash fractions in the sub-half-micrometer- diameter aerosol accumulation region. Instrumental neutron activation analysis provided the sensitivity to determine accurately the concentrations of 28 major, minor, and trace elements with sufficient precision to reveal fine structure in the elemental distributions that might be missed by techniques of lesser accuracy and precision. 

Chemical Composition Aerosol composition measurements have most frequently been made with little or no size resolution, most often by analysis of filter samples of the aggregate aerosol. Sample fractionation into coarse and fine fractions is achieved with a variety of dichotomous samplers. These instruments spread the collected sample over a relatively large area on a filter that can be analyzed directly or after extraction Time resolution is determined by the sample flow rate and the detection limits of the analytical techniques, but sampling times less than 1 h are rarely used even when the analytical techniques would permit them. These longer times are the result of experiment design rather than feasibility. Measurements of the distribution of chemical composition with respect to particle size have, until recently, been limited to particles larger than a few tenths of a micrometer in diameter and relatively low time resolution. One of the primary tools for composition-size distribution measurements is the cascade impactor. 

Suspensions contain micronized drug for proper delivery to and absorption in the respiratory system. Typical particle size of the micronized drug is from 2 to 5 microns [5], Aerodynamic mean particle size as measured by cascade impactor or direct method of microscopic analysis is usually from 0.5 to 4 microns [5], Additional particle-sizing techniques such as light scattering can be used [6],... 

---