Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Blocking sites

FIG. 9 The coverage of CO as a function of time as obtained from Monte Carlo simulations with a 256 x 256 grid and for the model with site blocking by inert X species. (From Ref. 68.)... [Pg.406]

A. P. J. Jansen, R. M. Nieminen. A Monte Carlo study of CO oxidation with oscillations induced by site blocking. J Chem Phys 706 2038-2044, 1997. [Pg.434]

Which implies that (x) is determined solely by the set of numbers representing the frequencies of two-site blocks appearing in the phase space point a . [Pg.381]

Takesue [takes89] has looked for local conservation laws holding true for all blocks B < 6 sites long. He finds that, for 5 < 4, 44 of the 88 ERCA equivalence rule classes possess a local conservation laws. Observing that no additional rules supporting local conservation laws appear if site blocks of sizes 5 and 6 are examined, Takesue conjectures [takes89] (but does not prove) that there exists a threshold size... [Pg.384]

Thus the promotional index PIp is positive for promoters and negative for poisons. In the latter case the definition of PIp coincides with that of the toxicity defined by Lamy-Pitara, Bencharif and Barbier several years ago.21 In the case of pure site-blocking it is PIp=-l. Values of PI02- up to 150 and of PINas+ up to 6000 have been measured as we will see in Chapter 4. [Pg.23]

The rules are simple as long as we also keep site-blocking effects in mind and as long as we can identify the electron acceptor or electron donor character of the various adsorbates. [Pg.35]

Despite the individual complexities of the systems surveyed here, several simple rules must have emerged in the reader s mind. Aside from the omnipresent site-blocking geometric effects, chemical or classical promotion can be understood, at least qualitatively, in terms of two simple and complementary mles, already outlined is section 2.5 ... [Pg.82]

Needless to remind that the above practical promotional rules are applicable for modest (e.g. <0.2) coverages of the promoting species so that site-blocking by the promoter does not become the dominant factor limiting the catalytic rate. [Pg.298]

If the surface is fully occupied by NO, all dissociation is blocked until temperatures are reached at which NO desorbs from the surface, after which dissociation follows instantaneously (right-hand panel of Fig. 7.12). Here dissociation is initially suppressed by site blocking rather than by lateral interactions. [Pg.283]

All of these results are consistent with the notion that surface migration of titanium oxide species Is an Important factor that contributes to the suppression of carbon monoxide chemisorption. The H2 chemisorption experiments on 1-2 ML of Ft, where no migration Is observed, strongly Indicate that electronic (bonding) Interactions are also occurring. Thus, for the tltanla system, both electronic Interactions and surface site blocking due to titanium oxide species must be considered In Interpreting SMSI effects. [Pg.86]

This approach of using 2D and 3D monodisperse nanoparticles in catalytic reaction studies ushers in a new era that will permit the identification of the molecular and structural features of selectivity [4,9]. Metal particle size, nanoparticle surface-structure, oxide-metal interface sites, selective site blocking, and hydrogen pressure have been implicated as important factors influencing reaction selectivity. We believe additional molecular ingredients of selectivity will be uncovered by coupling the synthesis of monodisperse nanoparticles with simultaneous studies of catalytic reaction selectivity as a function of the structural properties of these model nanoparticle catalyst systems. [Pg.149]

The effect of the surface oxide species on the rate of the ORR is explained by metal site blocking, and can be described mathematically by including a 1 — 6ox term in the pre-exponential factor of the rate expression. [Pg.18]

Photocatalytic oxidation of ethanol on Pt/ri02 and Nafion coated Ti02 catalysts were studied using in situ infrared IR techniques. Infrared studies show that the reaction produced acetaldehyde, acetic acid, acetate, formic acid, formate, and CO2/H2O. Modification of the Ti02 catalyst by Pt and Nafion slowed down the oxidation reaction through site blocking. Incorporation of Pt was found to favor formation of formate (HCOO ), indicating Pt decreases the rate of oxidation of formate more than that of its formation. [Pg.463]

The randomization scheme assigns a therapy randomly across a study population based on various stratification factors such as site, blocking factor, and perhaps subject demographics. There is no actual patient assignment information in this data table. Here is an example of a randomization scheme with a block size of four and a treatment ratio of 2 2 ... [Pg.38]

N/O surface diffusion on to facets(>300 K), site blocking on facets... [Pg.73]

Bis(ethylacetoacetonate)-lanthanide(III) alkoxides, represented by structure (314), also initiate the well-controlled ROP of CL.895 Mn increases linearly with conversion (with Mw/Mn<1.10 throughout), and increasing [M]0/[I]o- Kinetic analysis implies a first order dependence on the lanthanide initiator, consistent with a non-aggregated active site. Block copolymers with moderately narrow polydispersities (1.25-1.45) have also been prepared using these initiators. NMR spectroscopy confirms well-controlled block sequences suggesting that these initiators are less susceptible to transesteriflcation than other lanthanide alkoxides. Initiation occurs exclusively at the alkoxide bond, and the tris(ethylacetoacetonate) analogs are inactive under the same conditions. [Pg.49]

Note Some protocols do not call for a reduction step. As an alternative to reduction, add 50 pi of 0.2 M lysine in 0.5 M sodium carbonate, pH 9.5 to each ml of the conjugation reaction to block excess reactive sites. Block for 2 hours at room temperature. Other amine-containing small molecules may be substituted for lysine—such as glycine, Tris buffer, or ethanolamine. [Pg.798]


See other pages where Blocking sites is mentioned: [Pg.200]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.308]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.283 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.456 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.208 , Pg.216 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption site blocker blocking effect

Antigen binding sites blocking

Block site-selective complexation

Block site-selective doping

Blocking agents to quench reactive sites

Blocking non-specific binding sites on the membrane

Building Block Approaches to Nanostructured, Single Site, Heterogeneous Catalysts

Coordination sites, blocking

Factor active site blocked

Kink sites, blocked

Site blocking effect

Sulfur site blocking

© 2024 chempedia.info