Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Single-determinent theory

One major source of error in Eq. (7) or AGf is the calculation of the O2 molecule using single determinant theories of electronic structure (such as DFT and Hartree-Fock) [80,81]. In general, gradient-corrected DFT functionals overestimate formation and binding energies and it is estimated that these are accurate for O2 to less than 0.5 eV [48]. It is fortunate however that many studies of stirface stability are not sensitive even to this magnitude of discrepancy in po, as is clear in the examples discussed below. [Pg.315]

The vast majority of stable molecules are of closed-shell electronic structure having an even number of electrons and no net electron-spin properties. For this class of molecule, the theory of the last chapter is a little redundant. In the present chapter the theory of the special case of a single determinant of doubly occupied spatial orbitals is obtained from the general single-determinant theory. [Pg.66]

In order to get these equations into a form suitable for computational implementation we need to do two things which were not required of the single-determinant theory ... [Pg.586]

For our purposes, we can equate Hartree-Fock theory to single determinant theory, and we are thus interested in finding a set of spin orbitals Xa such that the single determinant formed from these spin orbitals... [Pg.111]

As DFT (at least below the fifth rung of Jacob s Ladder [34] ) is a single-determinant theory, diagnostics based on the structure of the multideterminantal wavefunction require additional wavefunction calculations, as do the %TAE[SCF] and %TAE[(7)] diagnostics. However, while preparing a lecture about the adiabatic connection [35] and hybrid DFT methods [36] for a graduate-level computational chemistry course, an alternative suggested itself, which is the subject of the present paper. [Pg.245]

In practice, each CSF is a Slater determinant of molecular orbitals, which are divided into three types inactive (doubly occupied), virtual (unoccupied), and active (variable occupancy). The active orbitals are used to build up the various CSFs, and so introduce flexibility into the wave function by including configurations that can describe different situations. Approximate electronic-state wave functions are then provided by the eigenfunctions of the electronic Flamiltonian in the CSF basis. This contrasts to standard FIF theory in which only a single determinant is used, without active orbitals. The use of CSFs, gives the MCSCF wave function a structure that can be interpreted using chemical pictures of electronic configurations [229]. An interpretation in terms of valence bond sti uctures has also been developed, which is very useful for description of a chemical process (see the appendix in [230] and references cited therein). [Pg.300]

Configuration Interaction (Cl) methods begin by noting that the exact wavefunction 4 cannot be expressed as a single determinant, as Hartree-Fock theory assumes. Cl proceeds by constructing other determinants by replacing one or more occupied orbitals within the Hartree-Fock determinant with a virtual orbital. [Pg.265]

HF (HF) theory is based on the idea that one takes an antisymmetrized product wavefunction and uses the variational principle to obtain the best possible approximation to the A -particle wavefunction that cannot be represented by such a single determinant. Thus, one inserts the single determinant into the Rayleigh-Ritz functional and performs a constraint variation of the orbitals. The results of the variational process are the famous HF equations that are satisfied by each of the orbitals ... [Pg.140]

The technique used to extract the wave function in this work is conceptually simple the wave function obtained is a single determinant which reproduces the observed experimental data to the desired accuracy, while minimising the Hartree-Fock (HF) energy. The idea is closely related to some interesting recent work by Zhao et al. [1]. These authors have obtained the Kohn-Sham single determinant wave function of density functional theory (DFT) from a theoretical electron density. [Pg.264]

A new and accurate quantum mechanical model for charge densities obtained from X-ray experiments has been proposed. This model yields an approximate experimental single determinant wave function. The orbitals for this wave function are best described as HF orbitals constrained to give the experimental density to a prescribed accuracy, and they are closely related to the Kohn-Sham orbitals of density functional theory. The model has been demonstrated with calculations on the beryllium crystal. [Pg.272]

However, if this is not the case, the perturbations are large and perturbation theory is no longer appropriate. In other words, perturbation methods based on single-determinant wavefunctions cannot be used to recover non-dynamic correlation effects in cases where more than one configuration is needed to obtain a reasonable approximation to the true many-electron wavefunction. This represents a serious impediment to the calculation of well-correlated wavefunctions for excited states which is only possible by means of cumbersome and computationally expensive multi-reference Cl methods. [Pg.243]

To illustrate the latter point, consider the butadiene radical cation (BD+ ). On the basis of Hiickel theory (or any single-determinant Hartree-Fock model) one would expect this cation to show two closely spaced absorption bands of very similar intensity, due to 7i i -> ji2 and ji2 —> JI3 excitation (denoted by subscripts a and v in Figure 28), which are associated with transition moments /xa and /xv of similar magnitude and orientation. Using the approximation fiwm) —3 eV288 the expected spacing amounts to about 0.7 eV. [Pg.243]

Our study has been restricted to molecules containing only first-row atoms and with wavefunctions dominated by one determinant. Molecules such as 03 are less accurately described, with an error of about 10 kJ/mol at the CCSD(T) level of theory. For such multiconfigurational systems, more elaborate treatments are necessary and no programs are yet available for routine applications. As we go down the periodic table, relativistic effects become more important and the electronic structures more complicated. Therefore, for such systems it is presently not possible to calculate thermochemical data to the same accuracy as for closed-shell molecules containing first-row atoms. Nevertheless, systems with wave-functions dominated by single determinant are by far the most abundant and it is promising that the accuracy of a few kJ/mol is obtainable for them. [Pg.28]

The usual first ah initio approximation to the wave function leads to the Hartree-Fock theory, where V molecular spin orbitals (. with one for each electron. Then, asking the question what is the single determinant solution with the lowest possible energy, we obtain the Hartree-Fock equations and density, ... [Pg.276]

In kinetics, the use of high pressure introduces various aspects of the compressibility that may sometimes seem confusing. This is partly related to the fact that our rate constants are phenomenological quantities determined by arbitrary sets of experimental conditions at the same time as they are described by one single model theory. [Pg.104]

M. Urban, P. Neogrady, and I. Hubac, Spin Adaptation in the Open-Shell Coupled-Cluster Theory with a Single Determinant Restricted Hartree-Fock Reference. In R. J. Bartlett (Ed.) Recent Advances in Coupled-Cluster Methods. Recent Advances in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 3. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), pp. 275-306. [Pg.41]

Clearly, a single neurotransmitter theory does not suffice to explain all known evidence. As a result, models that include two or more systems have been developed to encompass their modulatory interactions. One of the most cogent is the permissive hypothesis, which proposes that a decreased function in central serotonin transmission sets the stage for either a depressive or manic phase ( 60). This circumstance itself is not sufficient to produce the mood disturbance, however, with superimposed aberrations in NE function required to determine the phase of an affective episode (i.e., decreased 5-HT and decreased NE subserves depression decreased 5-HT and increased NE subserves mania). Data from animal studies to support this theory include the following ... [Pg.115]


See other pages where Single-determinent theory is mentioned: [Pg.201]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.1708]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.1708]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.469]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 , Pg.528 ]




SEARCH



Single determinant

© 2024 chempedia.info