Simple peak integration

If we take the first channel on each side of the peak beyond what we consider as being the peak region as representative of the background, then the gross (or integral) area of the peak is  

It is stiU possible to find incorrect expressions for the calculation of peak area uncertainty in the literature. The confusion arises because of a failure to appreciate that unlike single background counts where the variance of the count is numerically equal to the count itself, the variance of a peak background depends upon the number of background channels used. The offending expressions are variation of the form  

These expressions are certainly correct for a single count plus background count, for example, from a simple beta counter. They are not valid for peak area calculations where Equation (5.40) must be used, resulting in the correct expression  

In the simple case of a single count plus background count, var(B), according to Poisson statistics is indeed equal to B and the expressions (5.39) and (5.40) are equivalent. In the peak area case, while var(G) is numerically equal to G, a sum of counts, the variance of the background estimate, var(B), depends upon the number of channels used to estimate (as opposed to measure ) the background as we saw earlier. Equation (5.41) does not take this into account and must, therefore, be generally incorrect. It is only true for the single case when n = 2m. 

In some analysis programs, peaked-background correction is made after peak areas and the background contribution have been separately converted to nuclide activities. Since the calculation of activity necessarily introduces extra uncertainties, it makes sense to make the background correction at the earliest possible stage of the analysis process. Ideally, analysis programs should allow the correction to be made in terms of peak count rate in counts per second. 

---

Blaauw et al (1999), using the 1994 IAEA reference spectra, compared the performance of three programs that used different methods of peak area determination. The program Apollo measures peak areas by a simple peak-integration method, Hypermet-PC uses iterative fitting... 

What is the reason for the overwhelming acceptance of stationary phases based on high-purity silicas in the pharmaceutical industry The answer is simple superior peak shapes for analytes with basic functional groups, which has been a problem with older phases. The older, low-purity silicas contain metal ions buried in the matrix of the silica. These contaminants acidify the surface silanols, and the consequence is a strong and non-uniform interaction with basic analytes. This in turn results in tailing peaks, which is an impediment for accurate peak integration and peak resolution. Of course, adding appropriate additives, such as amine modifiers, to the mobile phase can solve these difficulties. But this is an unnecessary and undesired complication in methods development. Therefore, silicas that are free from this complication are much preferred. 

Initially, these simple systems only needed to manage the acqnired raw data files, method files, resnlt files, and report files. The raw data files contained the raw x- coordinates of the detector signal, and also contained basic information abont the sample called header information . The method file contained basic A/D control information, the parameters nsed for peak integration, as well as calibration information if the assay performed quantitation against a standard cnrve. The resnlt generated was often a separate file that contained all of the calculated or quantitated... 

Laeven and Smit presented a method for determining optimal peak integration intervals and optimal peak area determination on the basis of an extension of the mentioned theory. Rules of thumb were given, based on the rather complicated theory. Moreover, a simple peak-find procedure was developed, based on the derived rules. 

For large values of /j. we encountered another difficulty the number of simulated points was too small to use a simple trapezoidal integration. For example, at p, = 0.9, we had only about ten points that make a significant contribution to the peak. Even though this was a simulation, we could not increase the point density, because t = 1 is the smallest step size of the model in many practical integrations, the step size may be limited by instrumental factors and likewise be fixed. In computing the standard deviation this difficulty was exacerbated because we calculated oy2 as the difference between two larger numbers. 

The analysis of the spectrum starts with visual or automatic identification of the peaks and subsequent labeling according to the below-mentioned criteria. Quantification is usually performed with simple measurements of peak intensities, peak width at half-height and at the 10% level and peak integral. The quantitative values are corrected against the values obtained for Cr peaks, and then compared with the normal spectra obtained from healthy individuals, or healthy brain parenchyma of the subject if present. 

The area under an isolated peak is obtained by simple graphical integration of the curve. For partially overlapping bands, it is possible to obtain rough... 

At least two manufacturers have developed and installed machines rated to produce more than 210 MW of electricity in the simple-cycle mode. In both cases, the machines were designed and manufactured through cooperative ventures between two or more international gas turbine developers. One 50-Hz unit, first installed as a peaking power faciUty in France, is rated for a gross output of 212 MW and a net simple-cycle efficiency of 34.2% for natural-gas firing. When integrated into an enhanced three-pressure, combined-cycle with reheat, net plant efficiencies in excess of 54% reportedly can be achieved. 

The area of a peak is the integration of the peak height (concentration) with respect to time (volume flow of mobile phase) and thus is proportional to the total mass of solute eluted. Measurement of peak area accommodates peak asymmetry and even peak tailing without compromising the simple relationship between peak area and mass. Consequently, peak area measurements give more accurate results under conditions where the chromatography is not perfect and the peak profiles not truly Gaussian or Poisson. 

Scattering and Disorder. For structure close to random disorder the SAXS frequently exhibits a broad shoulder that is alternatively called liquid scattering ([206] [86], p. 50) or long-period peak . Let us consider disordered, concentrated systems. A poor theory like the one of Porod [18] is not consistent with respect to disorder, as it divides the volume into equal lots before starting to model the process. He concludes that statistical population (of the lots) does not lead to correlation. Better is the theory of Hosemann [158,211], His distorted structure does not pre-define any lots, and consequently it is able to describe (discrete) liquid scattering. The problems of liquid scattering have been studied since the early days of statistical physics. To-date several approximations and some analytical solutions are known. Most frequently applied [201,212-216] is the Percus-Yevick [217] approximation of the Ornstein-Zernike integral equation. The approximation offers a simple descrip-... 

FIGURE I I The ApexTrack integration algorithm and its ability to easily identify and quantitate shoulders.These shoulder peaks may be quantitated using simple dropped perpendicular lines or through Gaussian peak fitting. 

---