Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structural data, similarity measures

However, its was found possible to infer all four microscopic tensor coefficients from macroscopic crystalline values and this impossibility could be related to the molecular unit anisotropy. It can be shown that the molecular unit anisotropy imposes structural relations between coefficients of macroscopic nonlinearities, in addition to the usual relations resulting from crystal symmetry. Such additional relations appear for crystal point group 2,ra and 3. For the monoclinic point group 2, this relation has been tested in the case of MAP crystals, and excellent agreement has been found, triten taking into account crystal structure data (24), and nonlinear optical measurements on single crystal (19). This approach has been extended to the electrooptic tensor (4) and should lead to similar relations, trtten the electrooptic effect is primarily of electronic origin. [Pg.89]

On the other hand, there is considerable interest to quantify the similarities between different molecules, in particular, in pharmacology [7], For instance, the search for a new drug may include a comparative analysis of an active molecule with a large molecular library by using combinatorial chemistry. A computational comparison based on the similarity of empirical data (structural parameters, molecular surfaces, thermodynamical data, etc.) is often used as a prescreening. Because the DFT reactivity descriptors measure intrinsic properties of a molecular moiety, they are in fact chemical fingerprints of molecules. These descriptors establish a useful scale of similarity between the members of a large molecular family (see in particular Chapter 15) [18-21],... [Pg.332]

The analysis of the data of PS I gave quite accurate information on the distance of the spin centres (25.4 0.3 A)301 that compared well with the crystal structure data.68 A problem is the extended it-spin density distribution in the donor and acceptor. For a solid comparison a centre of gravity for the spin must be calculated from experimental or theoretical spin density distributions of the two radicals. Similar data with almost unaltered distances were obtained for PS I with other quinones substituted into the Ai site.147-302This work has been extended to other electron acceptors,303 which show a larger heterogeneity in distances. It has been shown that the lifetime of the RP can also be measured and can even be controlled in the experiments by an additional mw pulse prior to the 2-pulse echo sequence.302 This pulse transfers population to triplet levels which cannot directly recombine to the singlet ground state. This has earlier been shown for the bRC.304,305 The OOP-ESEEM technique has also been applied to various mutants of PS I to characterize them by the measured distances between fixed donor and variable acceptors.254 256-263-264... [Pg.204]

Results The data in Table II offer the opportunity to compare phthalates of four different eight-carbon alcohols. The performance differences are perhaps greater than would be expected from such simple variations in skeletal makeup. The most notable differences are in volatility and low temperature properties, but other minor differences also exist. Greater linearity leads to increased efficiency (as measured by the 100% modulus), lower volatility, better flexibility at low temperatures, and better resistance to soapy water. In most circumstances, the linear alcohol phthalates are quite similar to straight chain phthalates. This is to be expected in view of the close similarity of structures. (The true value of a plasticizer system must, of course, consider not only oerformance but price. Thus, high efficiency can sometimes be a disadvantage when costs on a pound volume basis are calculated. In other words, a less efficient plasticizer often gives the lowest compound pound volume cost.)... [Pg.70]

In order to find structures in a data set or to reveal similarities of samples, organisms,. .. which in the following are called objects, first of all one needs a similarity measure. The simplest similarity measure can be derived from geometry. Without proof one intuitively accepts that similarity and distance are complementary in nature and remember the law of PYTHAGORAS about the distance d of two points Ox and C)2 in a rectangular system of two axes y and x ... [Pg.153]

After selecting a measure one has to decide which clustering algorithm (strategy) may be appropriate. Sometimes it is necessary for the algorithm to fit the similarity measure. In most cases one wishes to use the algorithm which yields the most interpretable or plausible data structure. [Pg.156]

To find the structures of the objects in the data set, we need a measure of similarity. Although many types of measures can be applied, the Euclidean distance is the most frequently used similarity measure. According to the law of Pythagoras, the distance between two points Oj and 02 characterized by variables x and y can be presented as follows (Figure 15.1) ... [Pg.371]

To examine the distortion of signal and the reduction of the noise, it is necessary to consider the structure — that is, the amount, location, and nature — of signal and noise in the observed responses. Each channel used to measure the data s response can be regarded mathematically as an axis, and because of the channel-to channel similarity (or correlation) in the data s response, these axes are correlated. Thus, an ultraviolet spectrum measured at 100 wavelength channels can be regarded as a 100-point vector or, equivalently, as a point in a 100-dimensional space. Because our goal is to understand the signal and noise content of the spectral response, the fact... [Pg.382]

Another approach of great importance for studies of excited state dynamics is sub-picosecond time resolved spectroscopy. A number of authors have reported femtosecond pump-probe measurements of excited state lifetimes in A, C, T, and G [13-16] and base pair mimics [17]. Schultz et al. have reported time resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and electron-ion coincidence of base pair mimics [18]. these studies can also be compared with similar measurements in solution [19-24], While time resolved measurements provide direct lifetime data, they do have the limitation that the inherent bandwidth reduces the spectral resolution, required for selecting specific electronic states and for selecting single isomers, such as cluster structure and tautomeric form. [Pg.326]

This chapter focuses on step 3. For step 1, descriptors may include property values, biological properties, topological indexes, and structural fragments. The performance of these descriptors and forms of representation have been analyzed by Brown and Brown and Martin. Similarity searching for step 2 has been discussed by Downs and Willett characteristics of various similarity measures have been discussed by Barnard, Downs, and Willett. " For step 4, little has been published specifically about visualization and analysis of results for chemical data sets. Flowever, most publications that focus on implementing systems that utilize clustering do provide details of how the results were displayed or analyzed. [Pg.2]


See other pages where Structural data, similarity measures is mentioned: [Pg.374]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.1028]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.1028]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.421]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.99 ]




SEARCH



Data structure

Measurement data

Measuring Similarity

Similarity measure

Structural data

Structural similar

Structural similarity

Structure similarity

Structured data

© 2024 chempedia.info