Shock waves some values

In an elegant study of shock waves in dilute N2Os/Ar mixtures, Schott and Davidson278 have measured the low-pressure limit of the rate coefficient for pure N205 decomposition, /c42, by monitoring N03 and N02 formation behind the shock front. By subsequently following the decay of N03 they were able also to compute values of k30 and k43. These values, however, should be accepted with caution since there was some difficulty in separating the individual contributions of steps (30) and (43) to the total rate of N03 destruction. However, their rate... 

The character of the solution is independent of the concrete form of the pressure decrease law at the piston it(t), described by the dimensionless function f(t/r), only if / decreases fast enough for large values of t/r. In particular, it is unimportant whether / increases continuously or discon-tinuously at t < r. Even for a continuous increase of the gas pressure, a shock wave will form with a pressure amplitude of the order of the maximum pressure P at the piston. The shock wave velocity here is of order D yjP/p0, so that some small mass of gas, of order Dp0r r is subjected to a shock compression of amplitude P. After the pressure at the piston goes to zero this gas, extending into the vacuum, attains a velocity of order u0 y/P/p0, and at the time t it will be located at a point x — u0t tyfP/p0. So, for example, if f(t/r) = 1 at 0 < t < t/r < 1 and... 

Finally in the diffusa- section 5 the pressure is recovered from the kinetic motion of the gas through some kind of shock wave - the fact which is well known in gas dynamics. Certainly the pressure recovers not up to the initial inlet value. The pressure losses (typically 20 - 30% at present) depend on the desired temperature in the working section 3 (as desired temperature is lower the gas movement is faster and pressure recovering is more difficult). This section acts like a compressor in TET. 

The change in p at low velocities is due to two processes. Due to the energy deposition, the cluster firstly undergoes a shock wave oscillation. Sec. 4.3, which, upon thermalization, results in shape changes involving the stretching and contraction of the interatomic distances. This causes a slight increase in the value of p with superposed oscillations. In addition, after some delay, the warm cluster can cool by the evaporation of one or two atoms, as illustrated in Fig. 29. 

In the nozzle in Fig. 8.18 air is flowing, and there is a normal shock wave at A. The remainder of the flow is isentropic. For this shock wave we have =3.0. What is Pj, /Pj Some of the following values from the NACA tables [15] may be... 

The groups of fines selected for multiple-line quantitative absorption spectrometry on OH in shock waves have lower state rotational quantum numbers in the range 1-10, so that over the 1000-3000 K range, some of the iVj/A o values involved increase and others decrease with changing temperature. There is thus only a minor effect of temperature upon the efiective extinction coefficient. 

Here is yet another example. A projectile hits a wall ( armor ). Fig. 7.12. The projectile is composed of Lemiard-Jones atoms (with some Sp and p. 347), and we assume the same for the wall (for other values of the parameters, let us make the wall less resistant than the projectile Sw < Sp and Ve,w > fe,p ) All together, we may have hundreds of thousands (or even miUions) of atoms (i.e., there are millions of differential equations to solve). Now, we prepare the input Rq and vq data. The wall atoms are assumed to have stochastic velocities drawn from the MaxweU-Boltzmaim distribution for room temperature. The same for the projectile atoms, but additionally, they have a constant velocity component along the direction pointing to the wall. At first, nothing particularly interesting happens-the projectile flies toward the wall with a constant velocity (while aU the atoms of the system vibrate). Of course, it is most interesting when the projectile hits the wall. Once the front part of the projectile touches the wall, the wall atoms burst into space in a kind of eruption, the projectile s tip loses some atoms, and the spot on the wall hit by the projectile vibrates and sends a shock wave. 

Some investigations have shown that there is a good linear correlation between the underwater and lead block test results. The best correlation is between the total energy of the explosive and the lead block expansion. This indicates that both shock wave and gas energy affect the lead block test, but its final value manifests as a composite effect of both of them. 

---