Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Shape polynomials

Chain Molecule Shape Graphs and Shape Polynomials... [Pg.96]

Inherent in the development of approximations by the described interpolation models is to assign polynomial variations for function expansions over finite elements. Therefore the shape functions in a given finite element correspond to a... [Pg.22]

The described direct derivation of shape functions by the formulation and solution of algebraic equations in terms of nodal coordinates and nodal degrees of freedom is tedious and becomes impractical for higher-order elements. Furthermore, the existence of a solution for these equations (i.e. existence of an inverse for the coefficients matrix in them) is only guaranteed if the elemental interpolations are based on complete polynomials. Important families of useful finite elements do not provide interpolation models that correspond to complete polynomial expansions. Therefore, in practice, indirect methods are employed to derive the shape functions associated with the elements that belong to these families. [Pg.25]

A similar procedure is used to generate tensor-product three-dimensional elements, such as the 27-node tri-quadratic element. The shape functions in two-or three-dimensional tensor product elements are always incomplete polynomials. [Pg.26]

Subparanietric transformations shape functions used in the mapping functions are lower-order polynomials than the shape functions used to obtain finite element approximation of functions. [Pg.35]

If necessary, the fit can be improved by increasing the order of the polynomial part of Eq. (9-89), so that this approach provides a veiy flexible method of simulation of a cumulative-frequency distribution. The method can even be extended to J-shaped cui ves, which are characterized by a maximum frequency at x = 0 and decreasing frequency for increasing values of x, by considering the reflexion of the cui ve in the y axis to exist. The resulting single maximum cui ve can then be sampled correctly by Monte Carlo methods if the vertical scale is halved and only absolute values of x are considered. [Pg.824]

Procedures for curve fitting by polynomials are widely available. Bell-shaped curves, however, are fitted better and with fewer constants by ratios of polynomials. For figuring chemical conversions, the... [Pg.2086]

In a general case parameters re, XdP and y must be determined by self-consistent two-parameter fitting. Owing to the property of orthogonality of Laguerre polynomials, one has for the spectral band shapes... [Pg.265]

The finite-element method (FEM) is based on shape functions which are defined in each grid cell. The imknown fimction O is locally expanded in a basis of shape fimctions, which are usually polynomials. The expansion coefficients are determined by a Ritz-Galerkin variational principle [80], which means that the solution corresponds to the minimization of a functional form depending on the degrees of freedom of the system. Hence the FEM has certain optimality properties, but is not necessarily a conservative method. The FEM is ideally suited for complex grid geometries, and the approximation order can easily be increased, for example by extending the set of shape fimctions. [Pg.148]

Linear PCR can be modified for nonlinear modeling by using nonlinear basis functions 0m that can be polynomials or the supersmoother (Frank, 1990). The projection directions for both linear and nonlinear PCR are identical, since the choice of basis functions does not affect the projection directions indicated by the bracketed term in Eq. (22). Consequently, the nonlinear PCR algorithm is identical to that for the linear PCR algorithm, except for an additional step used to compute the nonlinear basis functions. Using adaptive-shape basis functions provides the flexibility to find the smoothed function that best captures the structure of the unknown function being approximated. [Pg.37]

The fraction undissolved data until the critical time can be least-square fitted to a third degree polynomial in time as dictated by Eq. (29). The moments of distribution ij, p2, and p3 can be evaluated from Eqs. (30) through (32), with three equations used to solve for three unknowns. These values may be used as first estimates in a nonlinear least-squares fit program, and the curve will, hence, reveal the best values of both shape factor, size distribution, and A -value. [Pg.183]

This model also reduces a one-hit model in the case n=l. However, when quadratic or higher-order polynomials are used, the shape of the curve changes considerably. Even so, at very low doses, provided that a 0, the linear component dominates. The resulting slope is usually much shallower than in the one-hit case, and thus yields a lower risk estimate. [Pg.303]

Procedures for curve fitting by polynomials are widely available. Bell shaped curves usually are fitted better and with fewer constants by ratios of polynomials. Problem P5.02.02 compares a Gamma fit with those of other equations, of which a log normal plot is the best. In figuring chemical conversion, fit of the data at low values of Ett) need not be highly accurate since those regions do not affect the overall result very much. [Pg.509]

The other plots are made with the software TABLECURVE. The special function F2 used there is a log-normal relation and F3 is a sine-wave function. Usually a ratio of low degree polynomials also provides a good fit to bell-shaped curves here five constants are needed. The Gamma distribution needs only one constant, but the fit is not as good as some of the other curves. The peak, especially, is missed. [Pg.543]

To motivate our next step recall that the LOFF spectrum can be view as a dipole [oc Pi (a )] perturbation of the spherically symmetrical BCS spectrum, where Pi(x) are the Legendre polynomials, and x is the cosine of the angle between the particle momentum and the total momentum of the Cooper pair. The l = 1 term in the expansion about the spherically symmetric form of Fermi surface corresponds to a translation of the whole system, therefore it preserves the spherical shapes of the Fermi surfaces. We now relax the assumption that the Fermi surfaces are spherical and describe their deformations by expanding the spectrum in spherical harmonics [17, 18]... [Pg.215]

According to the results, it is determined that the asphericities can be described in terms of polynomials in Forni et al. [140] also used an off-lattice model and an MC Pivot algorithm to determine the star asphericity for ideal, theta, and EV 12-arm star chains. They also found that the EV stars chains are more spherical than the ideal and theta star chains. In these simulations the theta chains exhibit a remarkable variation of shape with arm length, so that short chains (where core effects are dominant for all chains with intramolecular interactions) have asphericities closer to those to those found with EV, while longer chains asymptotically approach the ideal chain value(see Fig. 10). [Pg.78]

The resorting to polynomials of higher orders leads to success only in those instances where the shape can reasonably be represented by polynomial approximation. Other strategies include piecewise fitting of linear functions or the use of appropriate transformations with the aim of retaining... [Pg.167]

Testing the Accuracy of a Calibration Spline Function. Of primary concern in calibration is the freedom from systematic errors introduced by fitting the wrong model. For judging the accuracy of the cubic spline functions, it is therefore desirable to start with a curve of known shape. Particularly difficult to adapt by ordinary polynomial expressions are... [Pg.172]

The presence of the central spot (the primary beam) and diffuse rings Idiff from the film support brings significant errors into estimated intensities. The shape of the primary beam feam can be approximated by one of several peak-shape functions such as pseudo-Voigt, Gaussian or Lorentzian [16], The diffuse background can be described by a polynomial function of order 12. Then equation (1) becomes... [Pg.137]


See other pages where Shape polynomials is mentioned: [Pg.306]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.837]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.191]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.127 ]




SEARCH



Polynomial

© 2024 chempedia.info