Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Separation of space and time variables

If H contains no explicit time dependence, then separation of space and time variables can be performed on the above Schrodinger equation P= / exp(-itE/h) to give... [Pg.39]

The appearance of non-commuting quantum variables can now also be traced back to the non-commutative algebra of 4D hypercomplex functions. On projection into 3D by the separation of space and time variables, the quaternion variables are reduced to complex functions that characterize orbital angular momentum, but the commutation properties remain. Not appreciating the essence of complex wave... [Pg.20]

Wave mechanics and particle mechanics, formulated to describe motion in three-dimensional space, are both incomplete by their failure to account for spin and relativistic effects. The common defect in both formulations lies in the unphysical separation of space and time variables. The proper procedure requires hypercomplex solutions of (2), which describe motion in four-dimensional space-time. ... [Pg.30]

It is important to note that the property of spin is only defined in quanternion notation, which specifies a conserved quantity J. It may be viewed as a fourdimensional symmetry operator, approximated by a three-dimensional angular-momentum operator L and a one-dimensional spin, on separation of space and time variables. The approximation J = L - - S implies that neither L nor S is a three-dimensional vector, both of them implying rotation in spherical mode [3]. The one-dimensional projections, and S, in an applied magnetic field or in a molecular environment are vector quantities. [Pg.139]

The nonclassical mathematical description of the world follows Eq.(l), which in practice is solved by the separation of space and time variables. Although it is a good approximation, it cannot render four-dimensional effects intelligible in three. The problem is highlighted by analogy with efforts to describe geometrical shapes in lower-dimensional space. [Pg.140]

Before illustrating this procedure for several cases of interest to nuclear chemists, we can point out another important property of the Schrodinger equation. If the potential energy V is independent of time, we can separate the space and time variables in the Schrodinger equation by setting... [Pg.648]

The steady-state assumption means that all quantities, expressed in terms of space and time variables are functions of x+Vt rather than x, t separately. [Pg.208]

A multichannel differentiator was built and installed on individual channels of tha XE octant system. Tha analysis of these data is not complete but they generally show (a) rod motions, (b) considerable 6o cycle noise, and (c) the invalidity of the assumption that the space and time variables in a reactor are separable, at least for the small transients occurring. [Pg.92]

This calculation is possible by using a mathematical treatment in simple cases when the diffusivity is the same in the layers of the package. It is made by considering the method of separation of the variables of space and time. In other more complex cases when the values of the diffusivity are different from one layer to the other, a numerical method is employed. [Pg.94]

For the solution of the Dirac hydrogen atom defined by Eq. (6.4) we first note that the space and time variables of the electron are well separated — as shown in section 4.2 for the general case — so that we may use the ansatz. [Pg.195]

In the light of the chapter on special relativity (chapter 2), it is apparent that there is a possible problem in performing this separation of the space and time variables, because the Lorentz transformation mixes them. The separation would have to be performed in a particular frame of reference, and only be valid in this frame of reference. If we want results in another frame of reference, we must perform a Lorentz transformation to that frame, and there is no guarantee that we will still have a stationary state. However, if our Hamiltonian is Lorentz invariant, the choice of the frame of reference is arbitrary, and, as we saw above, the probability density is independent of time and of the frame of reference. We may therefore choose the frame that is most convenient. In molecules (and in atoms) the Born-Oppenheimer frame is the most convenient frame of reference for electronic stmcture calculations because the nuclear potential is then simply the static Coulomb potential. Regardless of whether the Hamiltonian is Lorentz invariant or not, it is this frame that we work in from here on. [Pg.45]

With a wave model in mind as a chemical theory it is helpful to first examine wave motion in fewer dimensions. In all cases periodic motion is associated with harmonic functions, best known of which are defined by Laplace s equation in three dimensions. It occurs embedded in Schrodinger s equation of wave mechanics, where it generates the complex surface-harmonic operators which produce the orbital angular momentum eigenvectors of the hydrogen electron. If the harmonic solutions of the four-dimensional analogue of Laplace s equation are to be valid in the Minkowski space-time of special relativity, they need to be Lorentz invariant. This means that they should not be separable in the normal sense of Sturm-Liouville problems. In standard wave mechanics this is exactly the way in which space and time variables are separated to produce a three-dimensional wave equation. [Pg.189]

As will be shown for the CD model, early mixing models used stochastic jump processes to describe turbulent scalar mixing. However, since the mixing model is supposed to mimic molecular diffusion, which is continuous in space and time, jumping in composition space is inherently unphysical. The flame-sheet example (Norris and Pope 1991 Norris and Pope 1995) provides the best illustration of what can go wrong with non-local mixing models. For this example, a one-step reaction is described in terms of a reaction-progress variable Y and the mixture fraction p, and the reaction rate is localized near the stoichiometric point. In Fig. 6.3, the reaction zone is the box below the flame-sheet lines in the upper left-hand corner. In physical space, the points with p = 0 are initially assumed to be separated from the points with p = 1 by a thin flame sheet centered at... [Pg.287]

The aim of this book is, first of all, to present the atmospheric cycle of the trace constituents. We will discuss in more detail the trace substances (Chapter 3) with relatively short residence time (<10 yr). The study of these compounds is particularly interesting since their sources and sinks as well as their concentrations are very variable in space and time. They undergo several physical and chemical transformations in the atmosphere. Among these transformations the processes leading to the formation of aerosol particles have unique importance. The aerosol particles control the optical properties of the air, the formation of clouds and precipitation and, together with some gases, the radiation and heat balance of the Earth-atmosphere system. Because of their importance the physical and chemical characteristics of aerosol particles will be summarized in a separate chapter (see Chapter 4). [Pg.13]

Methods based on the partitioning of a reaction system into fast and slow components have been proposed by several authors [158-160], A key assumption made in this context is the separation of the space of concentration variables into two orthogonal subspaces and Qf spanned by the slow and fast reactions. With this assumption the time variation of the species concentrations is given as... [Pg.221]

To achieve the desired separation of the reactive degree of freedom from the bath modes, we use time-dependent normal form theory [40,99]. As a first step, the phase space is extended through the addition of two auxiliary variables a canonical coordinate x, which takes the same value as time t, and its conjugate momentum PT. The dynamics on the extended phase space is described by the Hamiltonian... [Pg.225]

A trickle-bed reactor was used to study catalyst deactivation during hydrotreatment of a mixture of 30 wt% SRC and process solvent. The catalyst was Shell 324, NiMo/Al having monodispersed, medium pore diameters. The catalyst zones of the reactors were separated into five sections, and analyzed for pore sizes and coke content. A parallel fouling model is developed to represent the experimental observations. Both model predictions and experimental results consistently show that 1) the coking reactions are parallel to the main reactions, 2) hydrogenation and hydrodenitrogenation activities can be related to catalyst coke content with both time and space, and 3) the coke severely reduces the pore size and restricts the catalyst efficiency. The model is significant because it incorporates a variable diffusi-vity as a function of coke deposition, both time and space profiles for coke are predicted within pellet and reactor, activity is related to coke content, and the model is supported by experimental data. [Pg.309]


See other pages where Separation of space and time variables is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.3397]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.140]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.57 ]




SEARCH



Separate variables

Separated variables

Separation of variables

Separation space

Separation time

Separation variables

Space-time

Variables and

© 2024 chempedia.info