Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Self-Consistent Calculation Scheme

The ground state of H=HssH+Hc+Hei.ei can be derived using a self-consistent, iterative numerical method developed by StafstrOm and Chao [38]. Assuming the initial values of the lattice configurations and the density matrix, the eigenenergies (Cj) and the expansion coefficients (B j) of the molecular orbitals are obtained from the Schrbdinger equation  [Pg.122]

is the number of electrons of each spin. New values for the dimerization order parameter, Arn=-( l) (Un Un+i) are calculated by minimizing the total energy of the system with respect to v = a(Un-Un+i). The total energy of the system with the full Hamiltonian (see Eq. (1)) is  [Pg.122]

Minimization of the total energy with respect to v gives the condition  [Pg.122]


However, the latter formula is not more applicable, if xlaa is rather long and/ or Cm is rather high, so that the zero-frequency ionic contribution Aefon(0) to permittivity is noticeable in comparison with the static permittivity es of the solution. We note that the Kirkwood correlation factor g is used for calculation of the component p in Eq. (387). Thus, even in our additivity approximation the solvent permittivity )jip is determined in this case by concentrations of both solution components. This complication leads to a new self-consistent calculation scheme. [Pg.289]

The goal of this chapter is twofold. First we wish to critically compare—from both a conceptional and a practical point of view—various classical and mixed quantum-classical strategies to describe non-Born-Oppenheimer dynamics. To this end. Section II introduces five multidimensional model problems, each representing a specific challenge for a classical description. Allowing for exact quantum-mechanical reference calculations, aU models have been used as benchmark problems to study approximate descriptions. In what follows, Section III describes in some detail the mean-field trajectory method and also discusses its connection to time-dependent self-consistent-field schemes. The surface-hopping method is considered in Section IV, which discusses various motivations of the ansatz as well as several variants of the implementation. Section V gives a brief account on the quantum-classical Liouville description and considers the possibility of an exact stochastic realization of its equation of motion. [Pg.250]

Dudokovic and co-workers (154, 155) extended the analysis of a QSSM to include difluse-gray radiation. They computed view factors by approximating the shapes of the crystal and melt by a few standard geometrical elements and incorporating analytical approximations to the view factors. Atherton et al. (153) developed a scheme for a self-consistent calculation of view factors and radiative fluxes within the finite-element framework and implemented this scheme in the QSSM. [Pg.97]

Another way to treat the influence of the surrounding lattice on a cluster is to use the embedded or immersed cluster technique. A number of realizations of this scheme have been proposed. We shall merely mention the directions of the evolution of these schemes rather than considering the question in detail. One way is to match the cluster and band solutions. This method, generally based on the early works of Grimley, was realized in Pisani (22) within the scope of CNDO/2. The whole system being considered (support and adsorbate) was subdivided into the cluster (adsorbate and a part of adsorbent) and the environment. Then the self-consistent calculation was carried out at a fixed environment. This approach was used to compute the adsorption of H (22) and CO (23) on graphite. [Pg.139]

Gummel, H.K. (1964) A Self-consistent Iterative Scheme for One-dimensional Steady State Transistor Calculations. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-11, 455-465. Lee, C.M., Lomax, R.J. and Haddad, G.I. (1974) Semiconductor Device Simulation. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., MTT-22, 160-177. [Pg.327]

In fact, the TB solution can be made to correspond very closely to the ab initio reference in Fig. 3 we compare the B3LYP band structure for WO3 with that obtained with a self-consistent TB scheme [85, 86]. In addition to the parameters a-y, the TB calculation employed for generating the band structure of Fig. 3 included crystal-field splitting terms, which however do not modify the M-0 hybridisation pattern. [Pg.188]

Symmetry-Adapted Crystalline Orbitals in SCF-LCAO Periodic Calculations. II. Implementation of the Self-Consistent-Field Scheme and Examples. [Pg.117]

At this point a side remark seems appropriate. All potentials shown in Fig. 2.3 originate from self-consistent calculations within the corresponding schemes. One might then ask how these curves change if the same density (and thus the same orbitals) are used for the evaluation of the different functionals This issue is addressed in Fig. 2.4 in which the solution of the OPM integral equation on the basis of three different sets of orbitals is plotted. [Pg.78]

One of the first cluster embedding schemes was put forth by Ellis and co-workers [172]. They were interested in studying transition metal impurities in NiAl alloys, so they considered a TMAl cluster embedded in a periodic self-consistent crystal field appropriate for bulk p -NiAl. The field was calculated via calculations, as was the cluster itself The idea was to provide a relatively inexpensive alternative to supercell DET calculations. [Pg.2225]

The u) parameter determines the weight of the charge on the diagonal elements. Since Ga is calculated from the results (MO coefficients, eq. (3.90)), but enters the Hiickel matrix which produces the results (by diagonalization), such schemes become iterative. Methods where the matrix elements are modified by the calculated charge are often called charge iteration or self-consistent (Hiickel) methods. [Pg.93]

Table X gives an idea of the strength of the various expansion methods, and it shows that, by using the principal term only, one can hardly expect to reach even the above-mentioned chemical margin, even if the wave function W gO(D) is actually very close in the helium case. This means that one has to rely on expansions in complete sets, and the construction of the modern electronic computers has fortunately greatly facilitated the numerical solution of secular equations of high order and the calculation of the matrix elements involved. For atoms, the development will probably go very fast, but, for small molecules one has first to program the conventional Hartree-Fock scheme in a fully self-consistent way for the computers, before the next step can be taken. For large molecules and crystals, the entire situation is much more complicated, and it will hence probably take a rather long time before one can hope to get a detailed understanding of the correlation phenomena in these systems. Table X gives an idea of the strength of the various expansion methods, and it shows that, by using the principal term only, one can hardly expect to reach even the above-mentioned chemical margin, even if the wave function W gO(D) is actually very close in the helium case. This means that one has to rely on expansions in complete sets, and the construction of the modern electronic computers has fortunately greatly facilitated the numerical solution of secular equations of high order and the calculation of the matrix elements involved. For atoms, the development will probably go very fast, but, for small molecules one has first to program the conventional Hartree-Fock scheme in a fully self-consistent way for the computers, before the next step can be taken. For large molecules and crystals, the entire situation is much more complicated, and it will hence probably take a rather long time before one can hope to get a detailed understanding of the correlation phenomena in these systems.
Restricted active space self-consistent field (RASSCF) scheme, ab initio calculations, P,T-odd interactions, 253-259... [Pg.286]

There are two ways of handling the interaction between the QM region and MM region one way is to calculate electrostatic QM-MM interaction with the MM method (sometimes called mechanical embedding, or ME) and the other is to include the QM-MM interaction in the QM Hamiltonian (called electronic embedding or EE). The major difference is that in the ME scheme the QM wave function is the same in the gas phase and the electrostatic interaction is included classically, while in the EE scheme the QM wave function is polarized by the MM charges. The EE scheme is substantially more expensive than ME scheme, as the SCF iteration needs to be performed until self-consistency is achieved for QM electron distribution. Although the polarization effects are called important, as we will show later,... [Pg.23]

Diastereoselectivity of the reactions of the cation 26 and the anion 29 derived from 25 (R2 = Me) was modeled by self-consistent reaction field solvation models obtained from ab initio SCF-MO calculations. The experimentally found cis/trans ratios confirmed the model (Scheme 1) <2002JOC2013>. [Pg.262]


See other pages where Self-Consistent Calculation Scheme is mentioned: [Pg.289]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.2369]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.181]   


SEARCH



Calculation scheme

Self-consistent calculations

© 2024 chempedia.info