Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Seeing is believing

Fewer studies have been made as yet with the PS I complex. Vallon et al. [89] made extensive immunogold labelling studies with spinach and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii thylakoids. When the membranes were probed with an antibody directed against the 68 kDa apoprotein of the Chi a-proteins of the PS I complex, almost all of the gold label was found in the non-appressed regions [89]. Since the [Pg.287]

Lateral heterogeneity has profound consequences for thylakoid function and structure [4,6,63] despite some uncertainty prevailing as to the absolute extent of lateral heterogeneity of the PS I complex, and the location of the Cyt 6//complex in both appressed and non-appressed membrane regions. [Pg.288]


After 1934, research on dislocations moved very slowly, and little had been done by the time the War came. After the War, again, research at first moved slowly. In my view, it was not coincidence that theoretical work on dislocations accelerated at about the same time that the first experimental demonstrations of the actual existence of dislocations were published and turned invention into discovery . In accord with my remarks in Section 3.1.3, it was a case of seeing is believing all the numerous experimental demonstrations involved the use of a microscope. The first demonstration was my own observation, first published in 1947, of the process of polygonization, stimulated and christened by Orowan (my thesis adviser). When a metal crystal is plastically bent, it is geometrically necessary that it contains an excess of positive over negative dislocations when the crystal is then heated, most of the dislocations of... [Pg.112]

In Section 3.2.3.2, the reader was introduced to dislocations (and to that 1934 paper by Geoffrey Taylor) and an account was also presented of how the sceptical response to these entities was gradually overcome by visual proofs of various kinds. However, by the time, in the late 1950s, that metallurgists and physicists alike had been won over by the principle seeing is believing , another sea-change had already taken place. [Pg.191]

North AJ (2006) Seeing is believing A beginners guide to practical pitfalls in image acquisition. J Cell Biol 172 9 18... [Pg.140]

Since seeing is believing , all the Health Authorities of the Gulf States wish to visually examine the various packaging elements. The quantities requested are as shown in Table 5. [Pg.172]

Typical of all human experience, seeing is believing, so the microscope has attracted much interest for many decades. All these inventions, of course, were basically initiated on the principles laid out by the telescope (as invented by Galileo) and the light-optical microscope (as invented by Hooke). Actually, no other scientific techniques have contributed so much to the scientific development in biology, medicine, and material science as the different microscopy techifiques. [Pg.652]

I do not myself claim to have any scientific knowledge whatever, but seeing is believing, and I have been privileged to keep in close touch with the author s experiments from the very beginning. Not only have I seen the results achieved, but I, among many others, have been able to test and pay grateful tribute to the... [Pg.4]

A plant experiences operating problems over a period of days. Different shifts witness different aspects of the problem, and so come up with different causes and proposed solutions. The people on each shift tend to discount the opinions of the other shifts because seeing is believing people place more credence on their own experience than on the unwitnessed experience of others. [Pg.687]

Schmid, M. B. (2004) Seeing is believing the impact of structural genomics on antimicrobial drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 739-746. [Pg.283]

Merrilield, C. J. (2004). Seeing is believing Imaging actin dynamics at single sites of endocytosis. Trends Cell Biol 14, 352-358. [Pg.544]

We do see water an aggregate of tiny water molecules. We are able to see the molecules, all right, but not an individual molecule. It is too minute to see with our naked eyes. So, are the atoms and the molecules for real Chemists assume and also believe that they are. What do atoms or molecules look like Chemists picture them based on the atoms and their combination, as we did in the last two chapters and do throughout this book. Can we see them Seeing is believing, isn t it But the atoms and molecules are too small to be seen with our naked eyes. So what should we do Magnify them ... [Pg.259]


See other pages where Seeing is believing is mentioned: [Pg.55]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.1210]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.304]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 ]




SEARCH



Believability

Believers

© 2024 chempedia.info