Second normal stress

The (CEF) model (see Chapter 1) provides a simple means for obtaining useful results for steady-state viscometric flow of polymeric fluids (Tanner, 1985). In this approach the extra stress in the equation of motion is replaced by explicit relationships in terms of rate of strain components. For example, assuming a zero second normal stress difference for veiy slow flow regimes such relationships arc written as (Mitsoulis et at., 1985)... 

The coordinates (x, y, z) define the (velocity, gradient, vorticity) axes, respectively. For non-Newtonian viscoelastic liquids, such flow results not only in shear stress, but in anisotropic normal stresses, describable by the first and second normal stress differences (oxx-Oyy) and (o - ozz). The shear-rate dependent viscosity and normal stress coefficients are then [1]... 

Here we describe the strain history with the Finger strain tensor C 1(t t ) as proposed by Lodge [55] in his rubber-like liquid theory. This equation was found to describe the stress in deforming polymer melts as long as the strains are small (second strain invariant below about 3 [56] ). The permanent contribution GcC 1 (r t0) has to be added for a linear viscoelastic solid only. C 1(t t0) is the strain between the stress free state t0 and the instantaneous state t. Other strain measures or a combination of strain tensors, as discussed in detail by Larson [57], might also be appropriate and will be considered in future studies. A combination of Finger C 1(t t ) and Cauchy C(t /. ) strain tensors is known to express the finite second normal stress difference in shear, for instance. 

Quotient of the second normal stress difference Nt) and the square of the shear rate (y) in the limit of zero shear rate... 

The symbols Nt and N2 denote the normal stress functions in steady state shear flow. Symmetry arguments show that the viscosity function t](y) and the first and second normal stress coefficients P1(y) and W2(y) are even functions of y. In the... 

Of major interest in this review are t](y) and (O) for which a large quantity of data has now been accumulated on well-characterized polymers. Some limited information is also available on the shear rate dependence of The second normal stress function has proved to be rather difficult to measure N2 appears to be negative and somewhat smaller in magnitude than N2 82). 

The Entanglement Concept in Polymer Rheology 8.4. Second Normal Stress Function... 

Second normal stress function, p22 — p33 at steady state in steady simple shear flow. 

Second normal stress coefficient, N2/y2-Number of distinguishable configurations. 

A similar arrangement consists of two parallel plates (20). In this arrangement the cone is replaced by a second plate. A combined use of cone-and-plate and parallel plate apparatuses yields, in principle, the possibility for the additional determination of the "second normal stress difference p22 — pi2. As no use will be made of this type of result in the following, it should suffice to state that with the parallel plate apparatus the shear rate is not uniform, but increasing linearly with the distance from the centre. 

In Chapter 1 the validity of a stress-optical law has been presumed. Furthermore, it has been shown for several polymer systems that this law is, at least approximately, valid and that the second normal stress difference (p22 — p33) must be very small compared with the first normal stress difference (pn — 22). In the present chapter some theoretical considerations of a more general character will be reviewed in order to indicate reasons for this special behaviour of flowing polymer systems. Some additional experimental results will be given. 

Kuo Y, Tanner RI (1974) Use of open-channel flows to measure the second normal stress differences Rheol Acta 13 931... 

Measurable normal stress differences, N = txx — ryy and N2 = tvv — tzz are referred to as the first and second normal stress differences. The first and second normal stress differences are material dependent and are defined by... 

The material functions, k i and k2, are called the primary and secondary normal stress coefficients, and are also functions of the magnitude of the strain rate tensor and temperature. The first and second normal stress differences do not change in sign when the direction of the strain rate changes. This is reflected in eqns. (2.51) and (2.52). Figure 2.31 [41] presents the first normal stress difference coefficient for the low density polyethylene melt of Fig. 2.30 at a reference temperature of 150°C. 

The second normal stress difference is difficult to measure and is often approximated by... 

A review by Bird and Wiest [6] gives a more complete list of existing viscoelastic models. The upper convective model and the White-Metzner model are very similar with the exception that the White-Metzner model incorporates the strain rate effects of the relaxation time and the viscosity. Both models provide a first order approximation to flows, in which shear rate dependence and memory effects are important. However, both models predict zero second normal stress coefficients. The Giesekus model is molecular-based, non-linear in nature and describes thepower law region for viscosity andboth normal stress coefficients. The Phan-Thien Tanner models are based on network theory and give non-linear stresses. Both the Giesekus and Phan-Thien Tanner models have been successfully used to model complex flows. 

Here we have three parameters r/o the zero-shear-rate viscosity, Ai the relaxation time and A2 the retardation time. In the case of A2 = 0 the model reduces to the convected Maxwell model, for Ai = 0 the model simplifies to a second-order fluid with a vanishing second normal stress coefficient [6], and for Ai = A2 the model reduces to a Newtonian fluid with viscosity r/o. If we impose a shear flow,... 

Indicating that the convected Jeffreys model gives a constant viscosity and first normal stress coefficient, while the second normal stress coefficient is zero. 

Figure 9.41 presents the predicted secondary flow patterns that result from the vicoelastic flow effects. The Giesekus model with one relaxation time was used for the solution presented in the figure. For the simulation, a relaxation time, A, of 0.06 seconds was used along with a viscosity, r], of 8,000 Pa-s and a constant a of 0.80. Similar results were achieved using the Phan-Thien Tanner-1 model. As expected, when the White-Metzner model was used, a flow without secondary patterns was predicted. This is due to the fact that the White-Metzner model has a second normal stress difference, N2 of zero. 

In a complex, polymeric liquid, normal stresses as well as the shear stress can be present, and these contributions will influence the shape of the structure factor. The simplest rheological constitutive model that can account for normal stresses is the second-order fluid model [64], where the first and second normal stress differences are quadratic functions of the shear rate. Calculations using this model [92,93,94,90,60], indicate that the appearance of normal stresses can rotate the structure factor towards the direction of flow in the case of simple shear flow and can induce a four-fold symmetry in the case of exten-sional flow. 

The same statement can be made about inelastic non-Newtonian fluids, such as the Power Law fluid, from a mathematical solution point of view. In reality, most non-Newtonian fluids are viscoelastic and exhibit normal stresses. For fluids such as those (i.e., fluids described by constitutive equations that predict normal stresses for viscometric flows), theoretical analyses have shown that secondary flows are created inside channels of nonuniform cross section (78,79). Specifically it can be shown that a zero second normal stress difference is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition to ensure the absence of secondary flow (79). Of course, the analyses of flows in noncircular channels in terms of constitutive equations—which, strictly speaking, hold only for viscometric flows—are expected to yield qualitative results only. Experimentally low Reynolds number flows in noncircular channels have not been investigated extensively. In particular, only a few studies have been conducted with fluids exhibiting normal stresses (80,81). Secondary flows, such as vortices in rectangular channels, have been observed using dyes in dilute aqueous solutions of polyacrylamide. Interestingly, these secondary flow vortices (if they exist) seem to have very little effect on the flow rate. 

A number of experimental techniques have been developed for measuring the viscosity and the first (and second) normal stress coefficient. In Table 15.2 a survey of these methods has already been given. 

In addition, the second normal stress difference, which for conventional polymers is in general negative with an absolute value of not more than 20% of the first normal stress... 

FIG. 16.34 The first and second normal stress differences in the shear flow of a 12.5% nematic solution of PBLG in m-cresol. From Magda et al. (1991). Courtesy The American Chemical Society. 

---