Seasonal model

Katz, B. A., and H. Leith. Seasonality of decomposers, pp. 163-184. In H. Leith, Ed. Phenology and Seasonality Modeling (Ecological Studies Analysis and Synthesis, Vol. 8). New Yoilc Springer-Verlag, 1974. 

Taylor, F.G. Jr. "Phenology and Seasonality Modeling", Helmut Lleth (Ed), Sprlnger-Verlag, N.Y., Heidelberg Berlin, 1974, p.237. 

So, the seasonal model of the global carbon cycle developed in the works by Nefedova and Tarko (1993) and Nefedova (1994) can be simulated by a system of 56 ordinary differential equations with periodic coefficients (i = 1,..., 14) ... 

For composed trend and seasonal processes, the ARIMA trend and the ARIMA seasonal model were multiplied, e.g. both AR components as well as both integration components and both MA components. Then the notation is ... 

The PACF illustrates the order 1 for the AR component, but at this stage of estimation of the model it is unknown if the trend or the seasonal model follow the autoregression with the order of one. No moving average component can be found from the PACF. Deduced possible models are ARIMA (1,1,0)( 1,0,0), ARIMA (0,1,0)( 1,0,0), or ARIMA (1,1,0)(0,0,0). 

One of the single seasonal models deduced from the previous conclusion is ARIMA (0,0,0)(1,0,0). This model will be proved for its significance relating to the seasonal fluctuations of the time series. The model ARIMA (0,0,0)(1,0,0) (Tab. 6-4) confirms the high significance of the seasonal AR component. Therefore, sp is set to unity. The resulting standard error of the model is 6.35 mg L 1 NO . The resulting fit and the errors from ARIMA (0,0,0)(1,0,0) are demonstrated in Fig. 6-26. 

These resulting errors must now be proved by autocorrelation function for seasonal effects. If the seasonal model is valid, no seasonal effects for autocorrelation function (Fig. 6-27), ACF, should be detectable. 

Seasonal effects from ACF of errors disappear. The seasonal model is sufficient. 

PACF of the errors indicates a first-order autoregression component, therefore the parameter p is set to unity. The spikes at lags 13 and 25 are a consequence of the multiplicative seasonal model. 

Green, F., and Edmisten, J. (1974) Seasonality of nitrogen fixation in Gulf Coast salt marshes. In Phenology and Seasonality Modeling (Lieth, H, ed.), pp. 113-126, Springer-Verlag, New York. 

Bias can be reduced by improving the model describing the true process in time and space. For example, annual indicators of chlorophyll means were 10-15 % lower when including a seasonal model, because there most data were sampled in periods... 

The empirical analysis of ARIMA multiplicative seasonal model to forecast the total number of coal mine accidents... 

ABSTRACT This paper is to research an application of the multiplicative seasonal model to forecast the total number of China s coal mine accidents. By the empirical analysis on the data of coal mine accidents from January 2006 to December 2010, an accepted multiplicative seasonal forecasting model ARIMA(4,1,1)(1,1,1) is built up after differing the series to be stationary and estimating the order and parameters of the model. Furthermore, the test of this multiplicative seasonal model shows that it has a desirable fitting effect on the data of coal mine accidents. At last, this model is applied to forecast the number of national coal mine accidents from January 2010 to December 2010, and the forecasted values have a high accuracy when compared to the actual data. 

Compared to ordinary time series models, the Multiplicative Seasonal Model needs more historical data, and the Multiplicative Seasonal Model can be applied to a wider field because data in daily life always have an obvious trend and seasonal features. Therefore, the Multiplicative Seasonal Model can well solve such problems that involve some issues about forecasting, and as well as reach a high precision. The model in this paper, ARIMA (4,1,1)(1,1,1) well matches the monthly changing number of national coal mine accidents. Moreover, the more historical data, the more accurate the forecasted result is. AH above, the Multiplicative Seasonal Model is a practical tool for us to forecast or to apply in many other fields. 

Study period is selected from November 2010 to September 2011 experienced wet and dry seasons. Model identification got reasonable results because of reasonable changing characteristics of aquifer structure, hydrogeological parameters. For example well 8 and well 11 (Figure 3). 

The Econometrics Toolbox contains some useful tools for analysing and preprocessing time series data. It is especially useful for fitting seasonal models. Unfortunately, not all the validation functions can be as easily obtained with this toolbox. Table 7.13 contains the required functions for creating an econometric model, Table 7.14 contains the functions for creating various types of correlatiOTi plots. Table 7.15 contains the functions for estimating the model parameters of econometric functions, and Table 7.16 contains useful functions for model validation. 

With these attributes, dynamic simulation becomes not only available, but also attractive to a much larger audience than ever before. While dynamic simulation is clearly a valuable tool in the hands of seasoned modellers, only when process engineers, control engineers, and plant operating personnel feel comfortable with it will dynamic simulation deliver its most powerful and value-adding benefits. 

---