Scrubbers, processing facilities

Other applications of the Recovery Scrubber process have been proposed by Morrison (1991). In general, these are based on the use of biomass ash from pulp and paper plants and other wood burning facilities. Biomass ash is rich in potassium and ery alkaline, so its use presents the possibility of both SO2 mnoval and potassium sul te recovery. 

Releases fo Land. Wastewater from the grid paste mixing scrubber is discharged to a surface impoundment and evaporated. Aithough your facility historically has removed lead sludge Irom the surface Impoundment each year, this has not been done for the past two years, as process changes have caused the sludge to accumulate more slowly than In previous years. Therefore, the impoundment must be considered an on-site land disposal unit, and releases to the impoundment must be reported in Part III, Section 5.5.1, of the form, and not in Part III, Section 5.3. 

The scope of the previously addressed CE case study is now altered to allow for stream segregation, mixing, and recycle within the ethyl chloride plant. There are five sinks the reactor (u = 1), the first scrubber (u = 2), the second scrubber (u = 3), the mixing tank (u = 4) and the biotreatment facility for effluent treatment (m = 5). There are six sources of CE-laden aqueous streams (in = 1-6). There is the potential for segregating two liquid sources (lu = 2, 4). The following process constraints should be considered ... 

Instead of disposing the water leaving the scrubber for Rj into the bio-treatment facility, it is beneficial to use it in a process sink. An appropriate sink is the mixer preceding the neutralizer (used in neutralizing the wastewater from... 

The process produces some organic waste derived from the thermal breakdown products of the wood, which is dealt with in a biological treatment facility. Volatile by-products are removed in a scrubber associated with a steam-condensing unit. Energy consumption is 2.8MJ to produce 1 kg of modified wood and the cost of production is about 150 Euros per m, with operational costs of 20 Euros per m. A plant capable of an annual production capacity of 75 000 m would require an initial investment of some 10-15 million Euros. 

F. The amount of agent being processed in any one operation is of a sufficiently small quantity as to be completely contained and absorbed by a network of filter scrubber systems. Further, the facility is designed to isolate one activity from another in an independent and completely autonomous manner by numerous air changes per hour in toxic areas (up to 25/hr.). 

---