Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sample preparation heterogeneous

As an alternative approach towards the above requirement, Somorjai introduced the method of electron lithography [119] which represents an advanced HIGHTECH sample preparation technique. The method ensures uniform particle size and spacing e.g. Pt particles of 25 nm size could be placed with 50 nm separation. This array showed a uniform activity similar to those measured on single crystal in ethylene hydrogenation. The only difficulty with the method is that the particle size is so far not small enough. Comprehensive reviews have been lined up for the effect of dispersion and its role in heterogeneous catalysis [23,124,125]. [Pg.90]

It needs to be pointed out, that the investigation of some technically important polymers like polyolefines has not been very successful so far. Owing to their inert nature they are difficult to dissolve and also difficult to ionize. Typically one needs for the ionization process some heterogeneities or double bonds in the polymer. For some insoluble substances a solvent-free sample preparation method has been developed that allows a characterization by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry [93]. [Pg.239]

External precision is the ability to demonstrate analytical repeatability with multiple preparations and analyses of a material over a long period of time. The MC-ICP-MS techniques and the more widespread TIMS methods either demonstrate or claim external precisions in the range 0.5 to 1.0%o (2ct). The stated precision for most TIMS methods is estimated from the reproducibility of the L-SVEC standard. In many cases the analysis of individual samples prepared multiple times yields precisions poorer than this estimate. This is in part due to the heterogeneity of natural samples and in part due to effects introduced during preparation and analysis that are not experienced by the standard. Zhang et al. (1998) cite reproducibility of the L-SVEC standard of <1.0%o (2ct), but their duplicate measurements of individual pore water samples vary from 0.1 %o to 6.1 %o (mean 2.3%o all 2cj). Later studies using refined TIMS procedures appear to achieve superior replicate precision (e.g., 0.4%o to 1. l%o for multiple replicates in Chan et al. 2002c). [Pg.158]

Selected entries from Methods in Enzymology [vol, page(s)] Association constant determination, 259, 444-445 buoyant mass determination, 259, 432-433, 438, 441, 443, 444 cell handling, 259, 436-437 centerpiece selection, 259, 433-434, 436 centrifuge operation, 259, 437-438 concentration distribution, 259, 431 equilibration time, estimation, 259, 438-439 molecular weight calculation, 259, 431-432, 444 nonlinear least-squares analysis of primary data, 259, 449-451 oligomerization state of proteins [determination, 259, 439-441, 443 heterogeneous association, 259, 447-448 reversibility of association, 259, 445-447] optical systems, 259, 434-435 protein denaturants, 259, 439-440 retroviral protease, analysis, 241, 123-124 sample preparation, 259, 435-436 second virial coefficient [determination, 259, 443, 448-449 nonideality contribution, 259, 448-449] sensitivity, 259, 427 stoichiometry of reaction, determination, 259, 444-445 terms and symbols, 259, 429-431 thermodynamic parameter determination, 259, 427, 443-444, 449-451. [Pg.632]

The surface of the fibril provides the interface between the internal structural and mechanical properties of a fibril, and the rest of the extracellular matrix. The surface, therefore, is the most complex area of the fibril in terms of molecular heterogeneity and structure. Caution has to be taken in the comparison of structural and biochemical evidence from complementary techniques since the extraction, dehydration, and sample preparation can cause variation in observations of fibril surface properties (Raspanti et at, 1996). [Pg.356]

Consideration of sample preparation also leads to the question of whether for some applications at least sensors would be more effectively constructed as a collection of modules each with a different function (sample preparation, transduction, detection, data collection) on a platform, large, small or miniaturised, rather than the old ideal of a small, self-contained device with intimately appressed layers which could return a rapid answer from a bucket of slime or some other spectacularly heterogeneous matrix. It is accepted that those with a taxonomic bent... [Pg.670]

Fig. 2. Surface heterogeneity of a powder sample of sodium chloride computed from the adsorption of argon at 76.1 K using a two-dimensional gas model of adsorption, x, Sample prepared by electrostatic precipitation of a NaCl aerosol O, same sample but after annealing at 31(1 315°C in a dry nitrogen atmosphere at 600mmHg. (Reproduced from ref. 4 by courtesty of Academic Press, Inc.)... Fig. 2. Surface heterogeneity of a powder sample of sodium chloride computed from the adsorption of argon at 76.1 K using a two-dimensional gas model of adsorption, x, Sample prepared by electrostatic precipitation of a NaCl aerosol O, same sample but after annealing at 31(1 315°C in a dry nitrogen atmosphere at 600mmHg. (Reproduced from ref. 4 by courtesty of Academic Press, Inc.)...
There are also catalyst formulations which have highly dispersed metals which are deliberately heterogeneously distributed on a support. If the microscopist is aware of the situation, he can take precautions in the sample preparation. This type of sample is the worst possible case to analyze because not only does the analyst have a complex mixture of components to sort out, but the analysis statistics are very poor. Consequently, additional time is usually required to survey the catalyst particles in order to establish a consensus of how it was constructed. Specialized specimen preparation such as ultramicrotoming and scraping the exterior of a sphere or extrudate may alleviate some of the interpretation problems. Additional aid may be solicited from a scanning electron microscope wherein an elemental distribution of a polished cross section of the catalyst sphere or extrudate can be made. [Pg.350]

The NMR data presented above reveal a dynamic heterogeneity of filled PDMS in the frequency range from about 10 kHz to 100 MHz. To determine whether the heterogeneity remains at lower fi equencies, dynamic mechanical measurements are performed. The results for cured, unfilled silicon rubber are compared with those for filled samples containing different fraction of hydrophilic Aerosil (380 m g ). For a more straightforward analysis of the mechanical experiments, a random poly(dimethyl/methyl-phenyl) siloxane copolymer containing approximately 90 mol% dimethyl- and 10 mol% methylphenyl-siloxane units has been used for sample preparation. This copolymer is fully amorphous over the whole temperature range. The results of torsion experiments at a frequency of 1.6 Hz are shown as a function of temperature in Fig. 7. [Pg.790]


See other pages where Sample preparation heterogeneous is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.86]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]




SEARCH



Heterogeneous preparation

Sample heterogeneous

Sample preparation heterogeneous samples

© 2024 chempedia.info