Ruthenium complexes, reactions mechanism

The three steps 32-34 have been suggested77 to be equilibria, and the overall equilibrium must lie far to the left because no adduct 23 is found in the reaction mixture when the reaction of sulfonyl chloride with olefin is carried out in the absence of a tertiary amine. A second possible mechanism involving oxidative addition of the arenesulfonyl halide to form a ruthenium(IV) complex and subsequent reductive elimination of the ruthenium complex hydrochloride, [HRulvCl], was considered to be much less likely. 

Although the actual reaction mechanism of hydrosilation is not very clear, it is very well established that the important variables include the catalyst type and concentration, structure of the olefinic compound, reaction temperature and the solvent. used 1,4, J). Chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6 6 H20) is the most frequently used catalyst, usually in the form of a solution in isopropyl alcohol mixed with a polar solvent, such as diglyme or tetrahydrofuran S2). Other catalysts include rhodium, palladium, ruthenium, nickel and cobalt complexes as well as various organic peroxides, UV and y radiation. The efficiency of the catalyst used usually depends on many factors, including ligands on the platinum, the type and nature of the silane (or siloxane) and the olefinic compound used. For example in the chloroplatinic acid catalyzed hydrosilation of olefinic compounds, the reactivity is often observed to be proportional to the electron density on the alkene. Steric hindrance usually decreases the rate of... 

Barrau and coworkers have synthesized a series of iron and ruthenium complexes by irradiation of Me2HGe(CH)KGeMe2H and Me2HGe(CH)K SiMe2H (n = 1, 2) in the presence of Fe(CO)5 and Ru3(CO)i293. In each case irradiation causes CO loss, with the formation of the M(CO)4 species (reaction 43). When n = 2 the products are photostable with n = 1 (65) a mixture of products (66-69) are obtained due to secondary photolysis (reaction 44). The mechanism, outlined in Scheme 23, is presented to explain these observations. 

Allyl methylcarbonate reacts with norbornene following a ruthenium-catalyzed carbonylative cyclization under carbon monoxide pressure to give cyclopentenone derivatives 12 (Scheme 4).32 Catalyst loading, amine and CO pressure have been optimized to give the cyclopentenone compound in 80% yield and a total control of the stereoselectivity (exo 100%). Aromatic or bidentate amines inhibit the reaction certainly by a too strong interaction with ruthenium. A plausible mechanism is proposed. Stereoselective CM-carboruthenation of norbornene with allyl-ruthenium complex 13 followed by carbon monoxide insertion generates an acylruthenium intermediate 15. Intramolecular carboruthenation and /3-hydride elimination of 16 afford the -olefin 17. Isomerization of the double bond under experimental conditions allows formation of the cyclopentenone derivative 12. 

Cationic ruthenium complexes of the type [Cp Ru(MeCN)3]PF6 have been shown to provide unique selectivities for inter- and intramolecular reactions that are difficult to reconcile with previously proposed mechanistic routes.29-31 These observations led to a computational study and a new mechanistic proposal based on concerted oxidative addition and alkyne insertion to a stable ruthenacyclopropene intermediate.32 This proposal seems to best explain the unique selectivities. A similar mechanism in the context of C-H activation has recently been proposed from a computational study of a related ruthenium(ll) catalyst.33... 

Ruthenium complexes do not have an extensive history as alkyne hydrosilylation catalysts. Oro noted that a ruthenium(n) hydride (Scheme 11, A) will perform stepwise alkyne insertion, and that the resulting vinylruthenium will undergo transmetallation upon treatment with triethylsilane to regenerate the ruthenium(n) hydride and produce the (E)-f3-vinylsilane in a stoichiometric reaction. However, when the same complex is used to catalyze the hydrosilylation reaction, exclusive formation of the (Z)-/3-vinylsilane is observed.55 In the catalytic case, the active ruthenium species is likely not the hydride A but the Ru-Si species B. This leads to a monohydride silylmetallation mechanism (see Scheme 1). More recently, small changes in catalyst structure have been shown to provide remarkable changes in stereoselectivity (Scheme ll).56... 

Although the molybdenum and ruthenium complexes 1-3 have gained widespread popularity as initiators of RCM, the cydopentadienyl titanium derivative 93 (Tebbe reagent) [28,29] can also be used to promote olefin metathesis processes (Scheme 13) [28]. In a stoichiometric sense, 93 can be also used to promote the conversion of carbonyls into olefins [28b, 29]. Both transformations are thought to proceed via the reactive titanocene methylidene 94, which is released from the Tebbe reagent 93 on treatment with base. Subsequent reaction of 94 with olefins produces metallacyclobutanes 95 and 97. Isolation of these adducts, and extensive kinetic and labeling studies, have aided in the eluddation of the mechanism of metathesis processes [28]. 

In the transition metal-catalyzed reactions described above, the addition of a small quantity of base dramatically increases the reaction rate [17-21]. A more elegant approach is to include a basic site into the catalysts, as is depicted in Scheme 20.13. Noyori and others proposed a mechanism for reactions catalyzed with these 16-electron ruthenium complexes (30) that involves a six-membered transition state (31) [48-50]. The basic nitrogen atom of the ligand abstracts the hydroxyl proton from the hydrogen donor (16) and, in a concerted manner, a hydride shift takes place from the a-position of the alcohol to ruthenium (a), re-... 

The enantioselective oxidative coupling of 2-naphthol itself was achieved by the aerobic oxidative reaction catalyzed by the photoactivated chiral ruthenium(II)-salen complex 73. 2 it reported that the (/ ,/ )-chloronitrosyl(salen)ruthenium complex [(/ ,/ )-(NO)Ru(II)salen complex] effectively catalyzed the aerobic oxidation of racemic secondary alcohols in a kinetic resolution manner under visible-light irradiation. The reaction mechanism is not fully understood although the electron transfer process should be involved. The solution of 2-naphthol was stirred in air under irradiation by a halogen lamp at 25°C for 24 h to afford BINOL 66 as the sole product. The screening of various chiral diamines and binaphthyl chirality revealed that the binaphthyl unit influences the enantioselection in this coupling reaction. The combination of (/f,f )-cyclohexanediamine and the (R)-binaphthyl unit was found to construct the most matched hgand to obtain the optically active BINOL 66 in 65% ee. 

The proposed mechanism involves the formation of ruthenium vinylidene 97 from an active ruthenium complex and alkyne, which upon nucleophilic attack of acetic acid at the ruthenium vinylidene carbon affords the vinylruthenium species 98. A subsequent intramolecular aldol condensation gives acylruthenium hydride 99, which is expected to give the observed cyclopentene products through a sequential decarbonylation and reductive elimination reactions. 

When aldehydes, with or without a hydrogen, are treated with aluminum ethoxide, one molecule is oxidized and another reduced, as in 9-69, but here they are found as the ester. The process is called the Tishchenko reaction. Crossed Tishchenko reactions are also possible. With more strongly basic alkoxides, such as magnesium or sodium alkoxides, aldehydes with an a hydrogen give the aldol reaction. Like 9-69, this reaction has a mechanism that involves hydride transfer.751 The Tishchenko reaction can also be catalyzed752 by ruthenium complexes.753 by boric acid,754 and, for aromatic aldehydes, by disodium tetracarbonylferrate Na2Fe(CO)4,755 OS I, 104. 

Similarities between [Ru(bpy),]2+ (discussed in Chapter 13) and [Pt,(pop)J4 are apparent. Reactive excited states are produced in each when it is subjected to visible light. The excited state ruthenium cation, [Ru(bpy)3]" +, can catalytically convert water to hydrogen and oxygen. The excited slate platinum anion, [Pt,(pop)J 4-, can catalytically convert secondary alcohols to hydrogen and ketones. An important difference, however, is that the ruthenium excited stale species results from (he transfer of an electron from the metal to a bpy ligand, while in the platinum excited state species the two unpaired electrons are metal centered. As a consequence, platinum reactions can occur by inner sphere mechanisms (an axial coordination site is available), a mode of reaction rot readily available to the 18-clectron ruthenium complex.-03... 

We have already seen that imines may be formed by the oxidative dehydrogenation of co-ordinated amines and that this is a commonly observed process, particularly in macrocyclic systems. Likely mechanisms for these dehydrogenations were suggested in Chapter 5, which emphasised the role of the variable oxidation state metal ions in the process. These reactions are quite general and many examples involving iron or ruthenium complexes have been studied in detail. 

The mechanism will vary in precise detail according to the metal. In the case of ruthenium complexes, it is quite common to observe a conproportionation and the formation of a ruthenium(iv) intermediate. In other cases, the unavailability of the metal oxidation states precludes reaction. For example, cobalt(m) complexes of cyclam cannot be oxidised to imine species because although a cobalt(ii)/cobalt(m) couple is possible, the cobalt(n) oxidation state is not accessible under oxidative conditions. In the case of metal ions which can undergo two oxidation state changes, alternative mechanisms which do not involve radical species have been suggested. 

The second and final example of a computational study of a reaction mechanism that will be considered here is drawn from work carried out by the author s group and serves to illustrate some of the points discussed in the previous section. The reaction in question is the catalytic hydrogenation of ketones by ruthenium(bisphosphine) (diamine) complexes. This reaction was developed by the group of Professor Ryoji Noyori20 and was also studied by the group of Professor Robert Morris. The initial computational work discussed here was a collaboration with Professor Morris. It was motivated by the desire to test the feasibility of a proposed mechanism, involving a key ruthenium dihydride complex, that would transfer a hydride (from Ru) and a proton (from N) in a concerted step to the ketone (Figure 10.9). 

---